Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: Identifying theory-informed hypotheses

Implementation Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Colquhoun, Heather L ^a   Carroll, Kelly ^b   Eva, Kevin W ^c   Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^b,d   Ivers, Noah ^e   Michie, Susan ^f   Sales, Anne ^g   Brehaut, Jamie C ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Audit and feedback; Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Theory

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; RECIPIENT; RESEARCH PRIORITY; SAMPLING; SOCIOLOGY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; CLINICAL AUDIT; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; INTERVIEW; MASS COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICAL AUDIT; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85030180451     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0646-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6(6):Art. No.: CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
2. Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, O'Brien MA, French SD, Young J, Odgaard-Jensen J. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(11):1534-41.
3. Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Carroll K, Chalifoux M, Eva KW. A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci. 2013;8:66.
4. Colquhoun H, Michie S, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw JM, Carroll K, Chalifoux M, Eva K, Brehaut J. Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary review. BMJ quality & safety. 2016;
5. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Response to "The OFF theory of research utilization". J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:117-8.
6. Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev Taylor & Francis Group. 2012;6(1):1-6.
7. Gardner B, Whittington C, McAteer J, Eccles MP, Michie S. Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1618-25.
8. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254-84.
9. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78(1):153-89.
10. Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2013;38(6):698-712.
11. Brehaut JC, Eva KW. Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implement Sci. 2012;7:114.
12. Thomas RE, Croal BL, Ramsay C, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminder messages on laboratory test requesting in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9527):1990-6.
13. Wadland WC, Holtrop JS, Weismantel D, Pathak PK, Fadel H, Powell J. Practice-based referrals to a tobacco cessation quit line: assessing the impact of comparative feedback vs general reminders. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(2):135-42.
14. Beck CA, Richard H, Tu JV, Pilote L. Administrative data feedback for effective cardiac treatment: AFFECT, a cluster randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294(3):309-17.
15. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24(8):659-66.
16. Creswell J, Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. California: Sage Publications; 2007.
17. Locke EA, Latham GP. A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1990.
18. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol. 2002;57(9):705-17.
19. Carver C, Scheier MF. Attention and self regulation: a control theory to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
20. Carver C, Scheier MF. On the self-regulation of behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
22. Elouafkaoui P, Young L, Newlands R, Duncan EM, Elders A, Clarkson JE, Ramsay CR, Translation Research in a Dental Setting Research Methodology G. An audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing in general dental practice: the RAPiD cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8):e1002115.
23. Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM. Reducing research waste with implementation laboratories. Lancet. 2016;388(10044):547-8.
24. Hysong SJ, Best RG, Pugh JA. Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: making feedback actionable. Implement Sci. 2006;1:9.
25. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ quality & safety. 2015;24(3):228-38.
26. Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Talyor SM. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol. 1979;64(4):349-71.
27. Brehaut JC, Colquhoun HL, Eva KW, Carroll K, Sales A, Michie S, Ivers N, Grimshaw JM. Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(6):435-41.