Split roles in performance evaluation - A field study involving new teachers

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 153-169

  Milanowski, Anthony T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

New teachers; Splitroles; Teacher evaluation; Teacher mentoring; Teacher performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750578616     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-006-9017-0     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Boswell, W. R. & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee Satisfaction with Performance Evaluations and Evaluators: The Role of Perceived Evaluation Use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283-299.
2. Camilli, G. (1990). The Test for Homogeneity for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: A Review of and Some Personal Opinions on the Controversy. Psychological Bulletin, 108(1), 135-145.
3. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R. & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple Uses of Performance Evaluation: Prevalence and Correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 130-135.
4. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Dorfman, P. W., Stephan, W. G. & Loveland, J. (1986). Performance Evaluation Behaviors: Supervisor Perceptions and Subordinate Reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39, 579-597.
6. Duke, D. L. (1990). Developing Teacher Evaluation Systems that Promote Professional Growth. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 131-144.
7. Hazi, H. M. (1994). The Teacher Evaluation-Supervision Dilemma: A Case of Entanglements and Irreconcilable Differences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2), 195-216.
8. Hunter, M. (1988). Effecting a Reconciliation Between Supervision and Evaluation - A Reply to Popham. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 275-279.
9. Ilgen, D. R. & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance Evaluation: A Process Focus. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5(pp. 141-197), Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI.
10. Keeping, L. M. & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance Evaluation Reactions: Measurement, Modeling, and Method Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708-723.
11. Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects if Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, A Meta-Analysis, and A Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254-284.
12. London, M. & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback Orientation, Feedback Culture, and the Longitudinal Performance Management Process. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 81-100.
13. Meyer, H. H. (1991). A Solution to the Performance Evaluation Feedback Enigma. Academy of Management Executive, 5(1), 68-76.
14. Meyer, H. H, Kay, E. & French, J. R. P. Jr. (1965). Split Roles in Performance Evaluation. Harvard Business Review, 43, 123-129.
15. Nolan, J. (1997). Can a Supervisor be a Coach? In J. Glanz & R. Neville (eds.), Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues, and Controversies. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.
16. Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practice. (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
17. Popham, W. J. (1988). Judgment-Based Teacher Evaluation. In S. J. Stanley & W. J. Popham (eds.), Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success, (pp. 56-71). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Prince, J. B. & Lawler E. E. III. (1986). Does Salary Discussion Hurt the Developmental Performance Evaluation? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 357-375.
19. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, Chapter 6.
20. Sashkin, M. (1981). Appraising Evaluation: Ten Lessons from Research for Practice. Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 37-50.
21. Stiggins, R. J., Duke, D. (1988). The Case for Commitment to Teacher Growth: Research on Teacher Evaluation. Albany, New York: SUNY.
22. Wang, J. & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored Learning to Teach According to Standards-Based Education Reform. A Critical Review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546.
23. Williams, K. J., DeNisi, A. S., Blencoe, A. G. & Cafferty, T. P. (1985). The Role of Evaluation Purpose: Effects of Purpose on Information Acquisition and Utilization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 314-339.