The role of pupil voice as a trigger for teacher learning in Lesson Study professional groups

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 435-455

  Warwick, Paul ^a   Vrikki, Maria ^a,b   Færøyvik Karlsen, Anne Mette ^c   Dudley, Pete ^a   Vermunt, Jan D ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^d EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Lesson Study; pupil voice; teacher learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059329625     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2018.1556606     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arksley, H., & Knight, P., (1999). Interviewing for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
2. Arnot, M., & Reay, D., (2007). A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and pupil consultation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 311–325.
3. Barber, M., (1994). Young people and their attitudes to school: An interim report of a research project in the Centre for successful schools. Keele: University of Keele.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
5. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L., (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
6. Cook-Sather, A., (2006). Sound, presence, and power: ‘Student Voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390.
7. Department for Education. (2014). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study. Retrieved August11, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-study.
8. Department for Education & Skills (2003). Every Child Matters. Retrieved August1, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/272064/5860.pdf.
9. Dudley, P., (1999). Do perception surveys work with young children? In C., Connor (Ed.), Assessment in action in the primary school (pp. 105–119). London: Falmer Press.
10. Dudley, P., (2003a). Research Lesson Study: A handbook for teachers. Nottingham: NCSL.
11. Dudley, P., (2003b). Research lesson study: Tools and templates. Nottingham: NCSL.
12. Dudley, P., (2011). Lessons for Learning: How teachers learn in contexts of Lesson Study (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of Cambridge.
13. Dudley, P., (2013). Teacher learning in lesson study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107–121.
14. Fernandez, C., (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development the case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405.
15. Flutter, J., (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343–354.
16. General Teaching Council for England (GTCE). (2004). The learning conversation. Talking together for professional development. Birmingham: GTC.
17. Government of the UK (2004). Children Act 2004. Retrieved August11, 2017, from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/31.
18. Hopkins, E., (2010). Classroom conditions for effective learning: Hearing the voice of Key Stage 3 pupils. Improving Schools, 13(1), 39–53.
19. Jaworski, B., (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-learners. In F. L., Lin & T. J., Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295–320). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20. Jaworski, B., & Huang, R., (2014). Teachers and didacticians: Key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2), 173–188.
21. Kvale, S., (1996). Interviews. London: Sage.
22. Lefstein, A., (2010). More helpful as problem than solution: Some implications of situating dialogue in classrooms. In K., Littleton & C., Howe (Eds.), Educational Dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 170–191). Abingdon: Routledge.
23. Lundy, L., (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942.
24. McCallum, B., Hargreaves, E., & Gipps, C., (2010). Learning: The pupil’s voice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 275–289.
25. McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J., (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 149–168.
26. Morgan, B., (2011). Consulting pupils about classroom teaching and learning: Policy, practice and response in one school. Research Papers in Education, 26(4), 445–467.
27. Murdoch, K., & Coe, R., (1997). Working with ALIS: A study of how schools and colleges are using a value added and attitude indicator system. Durham: School of Education, University of Durham.
28. Norwich, B., Dudley, P., & Ylonen, A., (2014). Using Lesson Study to assess pupils’ learning difficulties. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(2), 192–207.
29. Ofsted (2015). School inspection handbook. Retrieved December1, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-inspection-handbook-from-september-2015.
30. Patton, M. Q., (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R., & Wallace, G., (1996). School improvement: What can pupils tell us? London: Routledge.
32. Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J., (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: ‘carving a new order of experience.’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.
33. Rudduck, J., & McIntyre, D., (2007). Improving learning through consulting pupils. Abingdon: Routledge.
34. Stenhouse, L., (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
35. Thompson, P., (2009). Consulting secondary school pupils about their learning. Oxford Review of Education, 35(6), 671–687.
36. Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., & Van Halem, N., (2017). Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211–224.
37. Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H., (2005). ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboard. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851–867.
38. Whitty, G., & Wisby, E., (2007). Whose voice? An exploration of the current policy interest in pupil involvement in school decision-making. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(3), 303–319.
39. Willow, C., (2002). Participation in practice: Children and young people as partners in change. London: Children’s Society.
40. Ylonen, A., & Norwich, B., (2012). Using Lesson Study to develop teaching approaches for secondary school pupils with moderate learning difficulties: Teachers’ concepts, attitudes and pedagogic strategies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(3), 301–317.