Comparative in vitro study of the accuracy of impression techniques for dental implants: Direct technique with an elastomeric impression material versus intraoral scanner

Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2019, Pages e89-e95

  Rech Ortega, Cristina ^a   Fernández Estevan, Lucía ^a   Solá Ruíz, Mª Fernanda ^a   Agustín Panadero, Rubén ^a   Labaig Rueda, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Accuracy; CAD CAM; Digital workflow; Full arch scan; Intraoral scanner; Polyether impression

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ELASTOMER; IMPRESSION MATERIAL; TITANIUM; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; ELASTOMERIC POLYMER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; IMAGING; ODONTOMETRY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; WORKFLOW; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; IN VITRO STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; ELASTOMERS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES;

EID: 85059291013     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22822     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:107-13.
2. Lee H, So J, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:285-91.
3. De Vasconcellos D, Noriyuki A, Melo A, Bottino MA, Özcan M. A microstrain comparison of passively fitting screw-retained and cemented titanium frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:834-8.
4. Grosmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger IM. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration. J Prosthet Dent.2006;95:258-61.
5. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;7:1201-8.
6. Nedelcu RG, Persson ASK. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1461-71.
7. Patzelt SMB, Emmanouilidi A. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18:1687-94.
8. Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24:313-21.
9. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2014;29:853-62.
10. Abduo J, Lyons K. Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. J Dent. 2013:1-8.
11. Nayyar N, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent.2013;109:210-5.
12. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology for Implants Considering Operator Experience, Implant Angulation, and Depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:54-64.
13. Giménez B, Pradíes G, Martínez-Rus F, Özcan M. Accuracy of two Digital Implant Impression Systems Confocal Microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:56-64.
14. Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. A new method for assesing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent.2016;55:68-74.
15. Lee SJ, Cho SB. Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods. J Adv Prosthodont.2011;3:177-85.
16. Bergin JM, Rubenstein JE, Mancl L, Brudvik JS, Raigrodski AJ. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent.2013;110:243-51.
17. Martínez-Rus F, García C, Santamaría A, Özcan M, Pradíes G. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels. Implant Dent.2013;22:268-76.
18. Assunçao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent. 2004;13:358-66.
19. Cabral LM, Guedes CG. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants. Implant Dent. 2007;16:187-94.
20. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:555-61.
21. Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impression. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:323-31.
22. Assunçao WG, Tabata LF, Cardoso A, Rocha EP, Gomes EA. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants. Implant Dent. 2008;17:248-56.
23. Assunçao WG, Britto RC, Ricardo Barao VA, Delben JA, dos Santos PH. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations. Implant Dent. 2010;19:167-74.
24. Rutkunas V, Ignatovic J. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:254-6.
25. Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Jr, Mollo FA. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:226-36.
26. Papaspyridakos P, Galluci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res.2016;27:465-72.
27. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:121-8.
28. Contreras EF, Henriques GE, Giolo SR, Nobilo MA. Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti- GAL-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:467-72.
29. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prosthesis by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:270-6.
30. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:466-73.
31. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Rotkina L, Zbären C, Enkling N, Blatz MB. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer- aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:165-74.