Mutagenesis and genetic screens in the mouse

Systematic Evaluation of the Mouse Eye: Anatomy, Pathology, and Biomethods

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 93-110

  O’Brien, Timothy P ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057470571     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Bedell, M.A., Jenkins, N.A., and Copeland, N.G., Mouse models of human disease. Part I: techniques and resources for genetic analysis in mice, Genes Dev., 11: 1, 1997.
2. Bedell, M.A. et al., Mouse models of human disease. Part II: recent progress and future directions, Genes Dev., 11: 11, 1997.
3. Miklos, G.L. and Rubin, G.M., The role of the genome project in determining gene function: insights from model organisms, Cell, 86: 521, 1996.
4. Lander, E.S., Array of hope, Nat. Genet., 21: 3, 1999.
5. Brown, S.D. and Peters, J., Combining mutagenesis and genomics in the mouse-closing the phenotype gap, Trends Genet., 12: 433, 1996.
6. Balling, R. et al., Great times for mouse genetics: getting ready for large-scale ENU-mutagenesis, Mamm. Genome, 11: 471, 2000.
7. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology, Science, 282: 2012, 1998.
8. Adams, M.D. et al., The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, Science, 287: 2185, 2000.
9. Venter, J.C. et al., The sequence of the human genome, Science, 291: 1304, 2001.
10. Lander, E.S. et al., Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome, Nature, 409: 860, 2001.
11. Battey, J. et al., An action plan for mouse genomics, Nat. Genet., 21: 73, 1999.
12. Nadeau, J.H. et al., Sequence interpretation. Functional annotation of mouse genome sequences, Science, 291: 1251, 2001.
13. Shin, M.K. et al., The temporal requirement for endothelin receptor-B signalling during neural crest development, Nature, 402: 496, 1999.
14. Meyers, E.N., Lewandoski, M., and Martin, G.R., An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination, Nat. Genet., 18: 136, 1998.
15. Schimenti, J. and Bucan, M., Functional genomics in the mouse: phenotype-based mutagenesis screens, Genome Res., 8: 698, 1998.
16. Woychik, R.P. et al., Functional genomics in the post-genome era, Mutat. Res., 400: 3, 1998.
17. Justice, M.J. et al., Mouse ENU mutagenesis, Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 1955, 1999.
18. Nadeau, J.H., Muta-genetics or muta-genomics: the feasibility of large-scale mutagenesis and phenotyping programs, Mamm. Genome, 11: 603, 2000.
19. Hrabe de Angelis, M. and Balling, R., Large-scale ENU screens in the mouse: genetics meets genomics, Mutat. Res., 400: 25, 1998.
20. Brown, S.D. and Nolan, P.M., Mouse mutagenesis-systematic studies of mammalian gene function, Hum. Mol. Genet., 7: 1627, 1998.
21. Gibson, F. et al., A type VII myosin encoded by the mouse deafness gene shaker-1, Nature, 374: 62, 1995.
22. Vitaterna, M.H. et al., Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior, Science, 264: 719, 1994.
23. Schumacher, A., Faust, C., and Magnuson, T., Positional cloning of a global regulator of anterior-posterior patterning in mice, Nature, 383: 250, 1996.
24. Cox, R.D. et al., Contrasting effects of ENU induced embryonic lethal mutations of the quaking gene, Genomics, 57: 333, 1999.
25. Schumacher, A. et al., The murine Polycomb-group gene eed and its human orthologue: functional implications of evolutionary conservation, Genomics, 54: 79, 1998.
26. Doolittle, D.P. et al., Catalog of Mutant Genes and Polymorphic Loci, 3rd ed., Vol. 1, Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, Lyon, M.F., Rastan, S., and Brown, S.D.M., Eds., Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
27. Russell, L.B. and Russell, W.L., Frequency and nature of specific-locus mutations induced in female mice by radiations and chemicals: a review, Mutat. Res., 296: 107, 1992.
28. Schlager, G. and Dickie, M.M., Natural mutation rates in the house mouse. Estimates for five specific loci and dominant mutations, Mutat. Res., 11: 89, 1971.
29. Favor, J., International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Working paper no. 4. Spontaneous mutations in germ cells of the mouse: estimates of mutation frequencies and a molecular characterization of mutagenic events, Mutat. Res., 304: 107, 1994.
30. Davis, A.P. and Justice, M.J., An Oak Ridge legacy: the specific locus test and its role in mouse mutagenesis, Genetics, 148: 7, 1998.
31. Russell, W.L., X-ray induced mutations in mice, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 16: 327, 1951.
32. Russell, L.B. et al., Chlorambucil effectively induces deletion mutations in mouse germ cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 86: 3704, 1989.
33. Russell, W.L. et al., Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 76: 5818, 1979.
34. Hitotsumachi, S., Carpenter, D.A., and Russell, W.L., Dose-repetition increases the mutagenic effectiveness of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in mouse spermatogonia, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 82: 6619, 1985.
35. Noveroske, J.K., Weber, J.S., and Justice, M.J., The mutagenic action of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in the mouse, Mamm. Genome, 11: 478, 2000.
36. Justice, M.J. et al., Mouse ENU mutagenesis, Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 1955, 1999.
37. Rinchik, E.M. and Carpenter, D.A., N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis of a 6- to 11-cM subregion of the Fah-Hbb interval of mouse chromosome 7: completed testing of 4557 gametes and deletion mapping and complementation analysis of 31 mutations, Genetics, 152: 373, 1999.
38. Justice, M.J. et al., Effects of ENU dosage on mouse strains, Mamm. Genome, 11: 484, 2000.
39. Weber, J.S., Salinger, A., and Justice, M.J., Optimal N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) doses for inbred mouse strains, Genesis, 26: 230, 2000.
40. Justice, M.J. et al., Effects of ENU dosage on mouse strains, Mamm. Genome, 11: 484, 2000.
41. Favor, J., The frequency of dominant cataract and recessive specific-locus mutations in mice derived from 80 or 160 mg ethylnitrosourea per kg body weight treated spermatogonia, Mutat. Res., 162: 69, 1986.
42. Shedlovsky, A. et al., Mouse models of human phenylketonuria, Genetics, 134: 1205, 1993.
43. Chen, Y., Schimenti, J., and Magnuson, T., Toward the yeastification of mouse genetics: chemical mutagenesis of embryonic stem cells, Mamm. Genome, 11: 598, 2000.
44. Munroe, R.J. et al., Mouse mutants from chemically mutagenized embryonic stem cells, Nat. Genet., 24: 318, 2000.
45. Chen, Y. et al., Genotype-based screen for ENU-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells, Nat. Genet., 24: 314, 2000.
46. Favor, J. and Neuhauser-Klaus, A., Saturation mutagenesis for dominant eye morphological defects in the mouse Mus musculus, Mamm. Genome, 11: 520, 2000.
47. Hrabe de Angelis, M.H. et al., Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis, Nat. Genet., 25: 444, 2000.
48. Nolan, P.M. et al., A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse, Nat. Genet., 25: 440, 2000.
49. Nolan, P.M. et al., Implementation of a large-scale ENU mutagenesis program: towards increasing the mouse mutant resource, Mamm. Genome,11: 500, 2000.
50. Soewarto, D. et al., The large-scale Munich ENU-mouse-mutagenesis screen, Mamm. Genome, 11: 507, 2000.
51. Kasarskis, A., Manova, K., and Anderson, K.V., A phenotype-based screen for embryonic lethal mutations in the mouse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95: 7485, 1998.
52. Justice, M.J. et al., Using targeted large deletions and high-efficiency N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis for functional analyses of the mammalian genome, Methods, 13: 423, 1997.
53. Rinchik, E.M., Developing genetic reagents to facilitate recovery, analysis, and maintenance of mouse mutations, Mamm. Genome, 11: 489, 2000.
54. You, Y. et al., Chromosomal deletion complexes in mice by radiation of embryonic stem cells, Nat. Genet., 15: 285, 1997.
55. Thomas, J.W., LaMantia, C., and Magnuson, T., X-ray-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95: 1114, 1998.
56. Mills, A.A. and Bradley, A., From mouse to man: generating megabase chromosome rearrangements, Trends Genet., 17: 331, 2001.
57. Zheng, B. et al., Engineering a mouse balancer chromosome, Nat. Genet., 22: 375, 1999.
58. Zheng, B., Mills, A.A., and Bradley, A., A system for rapid generation of coat color-tagged knockouts and defined chromosomal rearrangements in mice, Nucleic Acids Res., 27: 2354, 1999.
59. Kucera, G.T., Bortner, D.M., and Rosenberg, M.P., Overexpression of an Agouti cDNA in the skin of transgenic mice recapitulates dominant coat color phenotypes of spontaneous mutants, Dev. Biol., 173: 162, 1996.
60. Okabe, M. et al., ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells, FEBS Lett., 407: 313-319, 1997.
61. Hadjantonakis, A.K., Generating green fluorescent mice by germline transmission of green fluorescent ES cells, Mech. Dev., 76: 79, 1998.
62. Rozmahel, R. et al., Modulation of disease severity in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator deficient mice by a secondary genetic factor, Nat. Genet., 12: 280, 1996.
63. Rancourt, D.E., Tsuzuki, T., and Capecchi, M.R., Genetic interaction between hoxb-5 and hoxb-6 is revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation, Genes Dev., 9: 108, 1995.
64. Beier, D.R., Sequence-based analysis of mutagenized mice, Mamm. Genome, 11: 594, 2000.
65. Nusslein-Volhard, C. and Wieschaus, E., Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila, Nature, 287: 795, 1980.
66. Kuwabara, P.E., Worming your way through the genome, Trends Genet., 13: 455, 1997.
67. Haffter, P. et al., The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio, Development, 123: 1, 1996.
68. Driever, W. et al., A genetic screen for mutations affecting embryogenesis in zebrafish, Development, 123: 37, 1996.