‘It was all in your voice’ - Tertiary student perceptions of alternative feedback modes (audio, video, podcast, and screencast): A qualitative literature review

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 72, Issue , 2019, Pages 32-39

  Killingback, Clare ^a   Ahmed, Osman ^a,b   Williams, Jonathan ^a  

^a BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b The FA Centre for Disability Football Research   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audio; Feedback; Podcast; Qualitative; Review; Screencast; Tertiary students; Video

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; COMPREHENSION; DATA EXTRACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERCEPTION; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; STUDENT; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEACHER; TEACHING; VIDEORECORDING; VOICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STUDENTS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 85056213410     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.012     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Barbour, R.S., Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ 322:7294 (2001), 1115–1117.
2. Borup, J., West, R.E., Thomas, R., Graham, C.R., Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn. 15:3 (2014), 232–256.
3. Carless, D., Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Stud. High. Educ. 31:2 (2006), 219–233.
4. Cavanaugh, A.J., Song, L., Audio feedback versus written feedback: instructors’ and students’ perspectives. JOLT 10:1 (2014), 122–138.
5. Dixon, S., The pastoral potential of audio feedback: a review of the literature. Pastoral Care in Education 33:2 (2015), 96–104.
6. Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., McCarthy, R., Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 38:3 (2013), 349–362.
7. Duncan, N., ‘Feed-forward’: improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 32:3 (2007), 271–283.
8. Gould, J., Day, P., Hearing you loud and clear: student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 38:5 (2013), 554–566.
9. Hattie, J., Timperley, H., The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77:1 (2007), 81–112.
10. Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Video-based feedback on student assessment: scarily personal. Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 31(1), 2015, 51.
11. Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H.J., Thorpe, L., Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Res. Learn. Technol. 19:1 (2011), 117–127.
12. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., Wells, J., Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. JALN 11:2 (2007), 3–25.
13. King, D., McGugan, S., Bunyan, N., Does it make a difference? Replacing text with audio feedback. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 3:2 (2008), 145–163.
14. Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, 2009, b2700.
15. Lipnevich, A., Smith, J., “I really need feedback to learn:” Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 21:4 (2009), 347–367.
16. MacGregor, G., Spiers, A., Taylor, C., Exploratory evaluation of audio email technology in formative assessment feedback. Res. Learn. Technol. 19:1 (2011), 39–59.
17. Marriott, P., Teoh, L.K., Using screencasts to enhance assessment feedback: students’ perceptions and preferences. Acc. Educ. 21:6 (2012), 583–598.
18. McCarthy, J., Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. IIER 25:2 (2015), 153–169.
19. McSwiggan, L.C., Campbell, M., Can podcasts for assessment guidance and feedback promote self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students? A Qualitative Study. Nurse Educ. Today 49 (2017), 115–121.
20. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 77:1 (2011), 81–112.
21. Pokorny, H., Pickford, P., Complexity, cues and relationships: student perceptions of feedback. Act. Learn. High. Educ., 11(1), 2010, 21.
22. Poulos, A., Mahony, M.J., Effectiveness of feedback: the students’ perspective. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 33:2 (2008), 143–154.
23. QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software; Version 10, 2012.
24. Quality Assurance Agency. 2012. Understanding Assessment: Its Role in Safeguarding Academic Standards and Quality in Higher Education.
25. Race, P., Using Feedback to Help Students to Learn. 2004, The Higher Education Academy.
26. Rodway-Dyer, S., Knight, J., Dunne, E., A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 35:2 (2011), 217–231.
27. Sipple, S., Ideas in practice: developmental writers’ attitudes toward audio and written feedback. J. Dev. Educ., 30(3), 2007, 22.
28. Thomas, J., Harden, A., Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8 (2008), 1–10.
29. Walker, M., An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable?. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 34:1 (2009), 67–78.