“During the interview, the interpreter will provide a faithful translation.” the potentials and pitfalls of researching interpreting in immigration, asylum, and police settings: methodology and research paradigms

Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages 229-244

  Pöllabauer, Sonja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055333442     PISSN: 03042294     EISSN: 22955739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.52034/LANSTTS.V5I.162     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barsky, Robert F. (1994). Constructing a Productive Other. Discourse Theory and the Convention Refugee Hearing. Pragmatics & Beyond Series 29. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Barsky, Robert F. (2000). Arguing and Justifying. Assessing the Convention refugees’ choice of moment, motive and host country. Research in Migration and Ethnic Relations Series. Aldershot, UK-Burlington, USA: Ashgate.
3. Berk-Seligson, Susan (2000). “Interpreting for the police: Issues in the pre-trial phases of the judicial process”. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 7(1), 213-238.
4. Berk-Seligson, Susan (2002). “The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-English Speaking Murder Suspect”. J. Cotterill (2002), 127-143.
5. Blommaert, Jan & Slembrouk, Stef (2000). “Data formulation as text and context: The (aesth)etics of analysing asylum seekers’ narratives”. http://bank.rug.ac.be/lpi/workingpapers.htm.
6. Commissioner General’s Office (2002). The asylum procedure before the CGRS. http://www.belgium.be/eportal/ShowDoc/cgvs/imported_content/pdf/BrochureENGDEF.pdf?contentHome=entapp.BEA_personalization.eGovWebCacheDocumentManager.en.
7. Cotterill, Jane (ed.) (2002). Language in the Legal Process, London: Palgrave.
8. Donk, Ute (1994). „Der Dolmetscher in kriminalpolizeilichen Vernehmungen. Eine ethnographische Strukturrekonstruktion“. In N. Schröer (ed.) (1994). Interpretative Sozialforschung. Auf dem Wege zu einer hermeneutischen Wissensoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 130-150.
9. Dunsmuir, Audrey & Williams, Lynn (1990). How to do social research. Sociology in Action. London: Collins Educational.
10. Edwards, Jane A. (1993). “Principles and Contrasting Systems of Discourse Transcription”. J. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (eds) (1993). Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3-31.
11. Fenton, Sabine (2004). “Expressing a well-founded fear. Interpreting in convention refugee hearings”. G. Hansen, K. Malmkjaer & D. Gile (eds) (2004). Claims, changes and challenges in translation studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 263-269.
12. Fowler, Yvonne (2003). “Taking an Interpreted Witness Statement at the Police Station: What Did the Witness Actually Say?”. L. Brunette et al. (eds) (2003). The Critical Link 3. Interpreters in the Community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 195-209.
13. Gile, Daniel (1994). “Opening up in interpretation studies”. M. Snell Hornby, F. Pöchhacker & K. Kaindl (eds) (1994). Translation Studies. An Interdiscipline. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 149-158.
14. Gile, Daniel (1997). “Interpretation Research: Realistic Expectations”. K. Klaudy & J. Kohn (eds) (1997). Transferre Necesse Este. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting. Budapest: Scholastica, 43-51.
15. Gile, Daniel (1998). “Observational Studies and Experimental Studies in the Investigation of Conference Interpreting”. Target 10(1), 69-93.
16. Gile, Daniel (2000a). “Issues in Interdisciplinary Research into Conference Interpreting”. B. Englund Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (eds) (2000). Language Processing and Simultaneous Interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 89-106.
17. Gile, Daniel (2000b). “The history of research into conference interpreting: A scientometric approach”. Target 12(2), 297-321.
18. Inghilleri, Moira (2003). “Habitus, field and discourse. Interpreting as a socially situated activity“. Target 15(2), 243-268.
19. Kälin, Walter (1986). “Troubled Communication: Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings in the Asylum-Hearing”. International Migration Review 20(2), 230-241.
20. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962/1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
21. Maryns, Katrijn & Blommaert, Jan (2001). “Stylistic and thematic shifting as a narrative resource: Assessing asylum seekers’ repertoires”. Multilingua 20(1), 61-84.
22. Maryns, Katrijn (2005). The Asylum Speaker. Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. Manchester, UK-Northampton MA: St. Jerome Press.
23. Mason, Ian & Stewart, Miranda (2001). “Interactional Pragmatics, Face and the Dialogue Interpreter”. I. Mason (ed.) (2001). Triadic Exchanges. Studies in Dialogue Interpreting. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome, 51-70.
24. Mason, Ian (2000). “Models and Methods in Dialogue Interpreting Research”. Olohan (ed.) (2000). Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I. Textual and Cognitive Aspects. Manchester, UK-Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Press, 215-231.
25. Monnier, Michel Acatl (1995). “The Hidden Part of the Asylum Seekers' Interviews in Geneva, Svitzerland: Some Observations about the Socio-Political Construction of Interviews between Gatekeepers and the Powerless”. Journal of Refugee Studies 8(3), 305-325.
26. Olohan, Maeve (ed.) (2000). Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I. Textual and Cognitive Aspects. Manchester, UK-Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Press.
27. Pöchhacker, Franz & Shlesinger, Miriam (eds) (2002). The Interpreting Studies Reader. London/New York: Routledge.
28. Pöchhacker, Franz (1995a). “‘Those who do...’: A Profile of Research(ers) in Interpreting”. Target 7(1), 47-64.
29. Pöchhacker, Franz (1995b). “Writings and research on interpretation: a bibliographic analysis”. The Interpreters’Newsletter 6, 17-31.
30. Pöchhacker, Franz (1998). “Unity in Diversity. The Case of Interpreting Studies”. L. Bowker et al. (eds) (1998). Unity in Diversity? Current Trends in Translation Studies. Manchester: St. Jerome Press, 169-176.
31. Pöchhacker, Franz (2000). Dolmetschen. Konzeptuelle Grundlagen und deskriptive Untersuchungen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
32. Pöchhacker, Franz (2004). Introducing Interpreting Studies. London/New York: Routledge.
33. Pöllabauer, Sonja (2005). “I don’t understand your English, Miss”. Dolmetschen bei Asylanhörungen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
34. Roy, Cynthia (2000). Interpreting as a Discourse Process. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Russell, Sonia (2002). “‘Three’s a Crowd’: Shifting Dynamics in the Interpreted Interview“. J. Cotterill (2002), Language in the Legal Process, London: Palgrave, 111-126.
36. Sauerwein [Sami], Fadia (2005). Dolmetschen bei polizeilichen Vernehmungen und grenzpolizeilichen Einreisebefragungen. Eine explorative translationswissenschaftliche Untersuchung zum Community Interpreting. PhD thesis. University of Saarland.
37. Scheffer, Thomas (2001). Asylgewährung. Eine ethnographische Verfahrensanalyse. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
38. Shlesinger, Miriam (1995). “Strangers in Paradigms. What lies ahead for simultaneous interpreting research?” Target 7(1), 7-28.
39. Turner, Graham, H. & Harrington, Frank (2000). “Issues of Power and Method in Interpreting Research”. Olohan (ed.) (2000). Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I. Textual and Cognitive Aspects. Manchester, UK-Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Press, 253-266.
40. van Dijk, Teun (ed.) (1997a). Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 1. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
41. van Dijk, Teun (ed.) (1997b). Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
42. Wadensjö, Cecilia (1992). Interpreting as Interaction: On Dialogue Interpreting in Immigration Hearings and Medical Encounters. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 83. PhD thesis. Linköping University.
43. Wadensjö, Cecilia (1998). Interpreting as Interaction. London/New York: Longman.
44. Wadensjö, Cecilia (2001). “Approaching interpreting through discourse analysis”. D. Gile et al. (eds) (2001). Getting Started in Interpreting Research. Methodological reflections, personal accounts and advice for beginners. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 185-198.