Erratum: Comparative genomics of the genus Lactobacillus reveals robust phylogroups that provide the basis for reclassification [Appl Environ Microbiol, 84, 17, (2018) (e00993-18)] Doi: 10.1128/AEM.00993-18;Comparative genomics of the genus Lactobacillus reveals robust phylogroups that provide the basis for reclassification

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 84, Issue 17, 2018, Pages

  Salvetti, Elisa ^a,b,c   Harris, Hugh M B ^a,b   Felis, Giovanna E ^c   O'Toole, Paul W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Comparative genomics; Lactobacillus; Phylogenomics; Phylogeny; Reclassification; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BACILLI; FOOD PRESERVATION; PROTEINS; TAXONOMIES;

COMPARATIVE GENOMICS; LACTOBACILLUS; PHYLOGENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; RECLASSIFICATION;

GENES;

AMINO ACID; BACTERIUM; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARBOHYDRATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; RADICAL;

LACTOBACILLACEAE; LACTOBACILLUS; LEUCONOSTOCACEAE;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; RIBOSOME PROTEIN; RNA 16S;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL GENOME; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; LACTOBACILLUS; METABOLISM; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOMICS; LACTOBACILLUS; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;

EID: 85052582885     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02052-18     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. Duar RM, Lin XB, Zheng JZ, Martino ME, Grenier T, Pérez-Muñoz ME, Leulier F, Gänzle M, Walter J. 2017. Lifestyles in transition: evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41: S27-S48. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux030
2. Zotta T, Parente E, Ricciardi A. 2017. Aerobic metabolism in the genus Lactobacillus: impact on stress response and potential applications in the food industry. J Appl Microbiol 122:857-869. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jam.13399
3. Sun Z, Harris HM, McCann A, Guo C, Argimón S, Zhang W, Yang X, Jeffery IB, Cooney JC, Kagawa TF, Liu W, Song Y, Salvetti E, Wrobel A, Rasinkangas P, Parkhill J, Rea MC, O'Sullivan O, Ritari J, Douillard FP, Ross RP, Yang R, Briner AE, Felis GE, de Vos WM, Barrangou R, Klaenhammer TR, Caufield PW, Cui Y, Zhang H, O'Toole PW. 2015. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat Commun 6:8322. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9322
4. Zheng J, Ruan L, Sun M, Gänzle M. 2015. A genomic view of lactobacilli and pediococci demonstrates that phylogeny matches ecology and physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:7233-7243. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02116-15
5. Stefanovic E, Fitzgerald G, McAuliffe O. 2017. Advances in the genomics and metabolomics of dairy lactobacilli: a review. Food Microbiol 61: 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2016.08.009
6. Bourdichon F, Casaregola S, Farrokh C, Frisvad JC, Gerds ML, Hammes WP, Harnett J, Huys G, Laulund S, Ouwehand A, Powell IB, Prajapati JB, Seto Y, Ter Schure E, Van Boven A, Vankerckhoven V, Zgoda A, Tuijtelaars S, Hansen EB. 2012. Food fermentations: microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int J Food Microbiol 154:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.030
7. Ricci A, Allende A, Bolton D, Chemaly M, Davies R, Girones R, Herman L, Koutsoumanis K, Lindqvist R, Nørrung B, Robertson L, Ru G, Sanaa M, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Snary E, Speybroeck N, Ter Kuile B, Threlfall J, Wahlström H, Cocconcelli PS, Klein G, Prieto Maradona M, Querol A, Peixe L, Suarez JE, Sundh I, Vlak JM, Aguilera-Gómez M, Barizzone F, Brozzi R, Correia S, Heng L, Istace F, Lythgo C, Fernandéz Escaméz PS. 2017. Scientific opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA. EFSA J 15:4664
8. Salvetti E, O'Toole PW. 2017. When regulation challenges innovation: the case of genus Lactobacillus. Trends Food Sci Technol 66:187-194. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.009
9. Collins MD, Rodrigues U, Ash C, Aguirre M, Farrow JAE, Martinez-Murcia A, Phillips BA, Williams AM, Wallbanks S. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1991.tb04313.x
10. Vandamme P, Pot B, Gillis M, de Vos P, Kersters K, Swings J. 1996. Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev 60:407-438
11. Felis GE, Dellaglio F. 2007. Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. Curr Issues Intestinal Microbiol 8:44-61
12. Salvetti E, Torriani S, Felis GE. 2012. The genus Lactobacillus: a taxonomic update. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 4:217-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-012-9117-8
13. Salvetti E, Fondi M, Fani R, Torriani S, Felis GE. 2013. Evolution of lactic acid bacteria in the order Lactobacillales as depicted by analysis of glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways. Syst Appl Microbiol 36: 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2013.03.009
14. Pot B, Felis GE, De Bruyne K, Tsakalidou E, Papadimitriou K, Leisner J, Vandamme P. 2014. The genus Lactobacillus, p 249-353. In Holzapfel WH, Wood EJB (ed), Lactic acid bacteria: biodiversity and taxonomy. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
15. Thompson CC, Chimetto L, Edwards RA, Swings J, Stackebrandt E, Thompson FL. 2013. Microbial genomic taxonomy. BMC Genomics 14: 913 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-913
16. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu XW, De Meyer S, Trujillo ME. 2018. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:461-466. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002516
17. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. 2005. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 187:6258-6264. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005
18. Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC, Zhou J, Oren A, Zhang YZ. 2014. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 196:2210-2215. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01688-14
19. Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. 2015. Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:209-216. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.001
20. Salvetti E, O'Toole PW. 2017. The genomic basis of lactobacilli as healthpromoting organisms. Microbiol Spectr 3(3):BAD-0011-2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.BAD-0011-2016
21. Glaeser SP, Kämpfer P. 2015. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:237-245. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.03.007
22. Touchon M, Hoede C, Tenaillon O, Barbe V, Baeriswyl S, Bidet P, Bingen E, Bonacorsi S, Bouchier C, Bouvet O, Calteau A, Chiapello H, Clermont O, Cruveiller S, Danchin A, Diard M, Dossat C, Karoui ME, Frapy E, Garry L, Ghigo JM, Gilles AM, Johnson J, Le Bouguénec C, Lescat M, Mangenot S, Martinez-Jéhanne V, Matic I, Nassif X, Oztas S, Petit MA, Pichon C, Rouy Z, Ruf CS, Schneider D, Tourret J, Vacherie B, Vallenet D, Médigue C, Rocha EP, Denamur E. 2009. Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths. PLoS Genet 1:e1000344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000344
23. Jaureguy F, Landraud L, Passet V, Diancourt L, Frapy E, Guigon G, Carbonnelle E, Lortholary O, Clermont O, Denamur E, Picard B, Nassif X, Brisse S. 2008. Phylogenetic and genomic diversity of human bacteremic Escherichia coli strains. BMC Genomics 9:560. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1471-2164-9-560
24. Brady C, Cleenwerck I, Venter S, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, Coutinho T. 2008. Phylogeny and identification of Pantoea species associated with plants, humans and the natural environment based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Syst Appl Microbiol 31:447-460. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.09.004
25. Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Butterfield CN, Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Dudek N, Relman DA, Finstad KM, Amundson R, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2016. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 1:16048. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nmicrobiol.2016.48
26. Hammes WP, Hertel C. 2003. The genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. In Dworkin M (ed), The prokaryotes. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
27. Dellaglio F, Felis GE. 2005. Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, p 25-50. In Tannock GW (ed), Probiotics and prebiotics: scientific aspects. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom
28. Coster E, White HR. 1964. Further studies of the genus Pediococcus. J Gen Microbiol 37:15-31. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-37-1-15
29. Leisner JJ, Vancanneyt M, Goris J, Christensen H, Rusul G. 2000. Description of Paralactobacillus selangorensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new lactic acid bacterium isolated from chili bo, a Malaysian food ingredient. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-1-19
30. Haakensen M, Dobson CM, Hill JE, Ziola B. 2009. Reclassification of Pediococcus dextrinicus (Coster and White 1964) Back 1978 (Approved Lists 1980) as Lactobacillus dextrinicus comb. nov., and emended de-scription of the genus Lactobacillus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:615-621. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65779-0
31. Haakensen M, Pittet V, Ziola B. 2011. Reclassification of Paralactobacillus selangorensis Leisner et al. 2000 as Lactobacillus selangorensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:2979-2983. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.027755-0
32. Alnajar S, Gupta RS. 2017. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies delineate six main clades within the family Enterobacteriaceae and support the reclassification of several polyphyletic members of the family. Infect Genet Evol 54:108-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.06.024
33. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. 2014. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe 9:111-118
34. Gribaldo S, Brochier-Armanet C. 2012. Time for order in microbial systematics. Trends Microbiol 20:209-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.02.006
35. Mattarelli P, Holzapfel W, Franz CM, Endo A, Felis GE, Hammes W, Pot B, Dicks L, Dellaglio F. 2014. Recommended minimal standards for description of new taxa of the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and related genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:1434-1451. https://doi.org/10.1099/ ijs.0.060046-0
36. Whitman WB. 2015. Genome sequences as the type material for taxonomic descriptions of prokaryotes. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:217-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.003
37. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. 2015. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1099/ ijsem.0.000778
38. Bottari B, Felis GE, Salvetti E, Castioni A, Campedelli I, Torriani S, Bernini V, Gatti M. 2017. Effective identification of Lactobacillus casei group species: genome-based selection of the gene mutL as the target of a novel multiplex PCR assay. Microbiology 163:950-960. https://doi.org/ 10.1099/mic.0.000497
39. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/ molbev/msj030
40. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33: 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
41. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425
42. Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
43. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 38:791-793
44. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. 2007. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 10:504-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2007.08.006
45. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0
46. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23: 673-679. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009
47. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607-2618
48. Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T. 2006. MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 19:5623-5630. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl723
49. Suzuki R, Shimodaira H. 2006. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22:1540-1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl117
50. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5-32
51. Zhang S, Oh J-H, Alexander LM, Özçam M, van Pijkeren J-P. 2018. D-Alanyl-D-alanine ligase as a broad-host-range counterselection marker in vancomycin-resistant lactic acid bacteria. J Bacteriol 13:607-617. https:// doi.org/10.1128/JB.00607-17