Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 461-466

  Chun, Jongsik ^a   Oren, Aharon ^b   Ventosa, Antonio ^c   Christensen, Henrik ^d   Arahal, David Ruiz ^e   da Costa, Milton S ^f   Rooney, Alejandro P ^g   Yi, Hana ^h   Xu, Xue Wei ⁱ   De Meyer, Sofie ^j   Trujillo, Martha E ^k  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^g AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^h Korea University   (South Korea)

ⁱ Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources   (China)

^j MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

Average nucleotide identity; Genome sequence; Minimal standards; Phylogenomics; Prokaryotic taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENOMICS; NOMENCLATURE; PHYLOGENY; PROKARYOTIC CELL; STANDARDS;

GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PROKARYOTIC CELLS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 85040040303     PISSN: 14665026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Whitman WB. The need for change: embracing the genome. In: Goodfellow M, Sutcliffe I and Chun J (editors). New Approaches to Prokaryotic Systematics. Methods in Microbiology, vol. 41. London: Academic Press; 2014. pp. 1-12.
2. Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 2015;38:209-216.
3. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:316-324.
4. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:81-91.
5. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:19126-19131.
6. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:2567-2572.
7. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14:60.
8. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: animproved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016;66:1100-1103.
9. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017;110:1281-1286.
10. Colston SM, Fullmer MS, Beka L, Lamy B, Gogarten JP et al. Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case. MBio 2014;5: e02136.
11. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBio-Cloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613-1617.
12. Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E et al. The SILVA and "All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)" taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D643-D648.
13. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006;33:152-155.
14. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:346-351.
15. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic Note: a place for DNADNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994;44:846-849.
16. Chun J, Grim CJ, Hasan NA, Lee JH, Choi SY et al. Comparative genomics reveals mechanism for short-term and long-term clonal transitions in pandemic Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:15442-15447.
17. Sangal V, Goodfellow M, Jones AL, Schwalbe EC, Blom J et al. Next-generation systematics: an innovative approach to resolve the structure of complex prokaryotic taxa. Sci Rep 2016;6:38392.
18. Thompson CC, Vicente AC, Souza RC, Vasconcelos AT, Vesth T et al. Genomic taxonomy of vibrios. BMC Evol Biol 2009;9:258.
19. Glaeser SP, Kämpfer P. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst Appl Microbiol 2015;38:237-245.
20. Brown JR, Douady CJ, Italia MJ, Marshall WE, Stanhope MJ. Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets. Nat Genet 2001;28:281-285.
21. Wu M, Scott AJ. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1033-1034.
22. Segata N, Börnigen D, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat Commun 2013;4:2304.
23. Hahnke RL, Meier-Kolthoff JP, García-López M, Mukherjee S, Huntemann M et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2016;7:2003
24. Goodwin S, Mcpherson JD, Mccombie WR. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 2016;17:333-351.
25. Deurenberg RH, Bathoorn E, Chlebowicz MA, Couto N, Ferdous M et al. Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention. J Biotechnol 2017;243:16-24.
26. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998;8:175-185.
27. Liao YC, Lin SH, Lin HH. Completing bacterial genome assemblies: strategy and performance comparisons. Sci Rep 2015;5: 8747.
28. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM, Na SI, Yoon SH et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053-2057.
29. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043-1055.
30. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016;32: 929-931.
31. Jolley KA, Maiden MC. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:595.
32. Ankenbrand MJ, Keller A. bcgTree: automatized phylogenetic tree building from bacterial core genomes. Genome 2016;59: 783-791