Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event

Safety Science

Volumn 98, Issue , 2017, Pages 159-166

  Allison, Craig K ^a   Revell, Kirsten M ^a   Sears, Rod ^b   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aviation; STAMP; Systemic safety; Systems thinking

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; AVIATION; SAFETY ENGINEERING; STAMPING;

POTENTIAL RISKS; PROCESS ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS; SAFETY ANALYSIS; SAFETY ELEMENTS; SAFETY MODELLING; SYSTEMIC APPROACH; SYSTEMS THINKING;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT; AIRPLANE CREW; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; AVIATION; DECISION MAKING; DECOMPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; LIFE THREAT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SAFETY PROCEDURE; SYSTEMS THEORY; THEORETICAL MODEL; WORKSHOP;

EID: 85021385520     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Air Accident Investigation & Aviation Safety Board (AAIASB) Accident Investigation Report 11/2006 Accident of the a/c 5B-DBY of Helios Airways, Flight HCY522 on August 14, 2005, in the area of Grammatiko, Attikis, 33 km Northwest Of Athens International Airport.
2. Air Accident Investigation Bureau of Singapore Interim Report Airbus A380, Registration 9V-SKE Diversion To Baku, Azerbaijan, AIB/AAI/CAS.101 September 2015.
3. Air Accidents Investigation Branch. 1992. Report on the accident to BAC One-Eleven, G-BJRT over Didcot, Oxfordshire on 10 June 1990. (Aircraft Accident Report 1/92). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5422faa7e5274a131400078d/1-1992_G-BJRT_2_.pdf.
4. Altabbakh, H., AlKazimi, M.A., Murray, S., Grantham, K., STAMP–Holistic system safety approach or just another risk model?. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 32 (2014), 109–119.
5. Arnzen, H.E., 1966. Failure Modes and Effect Analysis: A Powerful Engineering Tool for Component and System Optimization, Report No. 347-40-00-00-K4-05 (C5776). GIDEP Operations Center, United States Navy, Corona, CA.
6. Barlow, R.E., Fault Tree Analysis. 1973, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
7. Boardman, J., Sauser, B., System of Systems-the meaning of. 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, 2006, IEEE, 6.
8. Carlock, P.G., Fenton, R.E., System of Systems (SoS) enterprise systems engineering for information-intensive organizations. Syst. Eng. 4:4 (2001), 242–261.
9. Harris, D., Stanton, N.A., Aviation as a system of systems: preface to the special issue of human factors in aviation. Ergonomics 53:2 (2010), 145–148.
10. Harris, D., Stanton, N.A., Starr, A., Spot the difference: operational event sequence diagrams as a formal method for work allocation in the development of single-pilot operations for commercial aircraft. Ergonomics 58:11 (2015), 1773–1791.
11. Harvey, C., Stanton, N.A., Safety in system-of-systems: ten key challenges. Saf. Sci. 70 (2014), 358–366.
12. Hollnagel, E., Barriers and Accident Prevention. 2004, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
13. Hollnagel, E., FRAM, the Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modeling Complex Socio-Technical Systems. 2012, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
14. Hutchins, E., Cognitive ecology. Topics. Top. Cognit. Sci. 2:4 (2010), 705–715.
15. Johnson, C.W., Holloway, C.M., The ESA/NASA SOHO mission interruption: Using the STAMP accident analysis technique for a software related ‘mishap’. Softw. Pract. Exper. 33:12 (2003), 1177–1198.
16. Laracy, J.R., Leveson, N.G., Apply STAMP to critical infrastructure protection. 2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, 2007, IEEE, 215–220.
17. Leplat, J., Occupational accident research and systems approach. J. Occup. Accid. 6:1 (1984), 77–89.
18. Leveson, N., A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42:4 (2004), 237–270.
19. Leveson, N., Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. 2011, MIT Press.
20. Leveson, N.G., Daouk, M., Dulac, N., Marais, K. (2003). Applying STAMP in accident analysis. Second Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Accidents, Williamsburg, September 2003.
21. Lindberg, A.K., Hansson, S.O., Rollenhagen, C., Learning from accidents–what more do we need to know?. Saf. Sci. 48:6 (2010), 714–721.
22. Rasmussen, J., Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27:2 (1997), 183–213.
23. Salmon, P.M., Cornelissen, M., Trotter, M.J., Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Saf. Sci. 50:4 (2012), 1158–1170.
24. Salmon, P., Williamson, A., Lenné, M., Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., Rudin-Brown, C.M., Systems-based accident analysis in the led outdoor activity domain: application and evaluation of a risk management framework. Ergonomics 53:8 (2010), 927–939.
25. Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Beyond human error taxonomies in assessment of risk in sociotechnical systems: a new paradigm with the EAST ‘broken-links’ approach. Ergonomics 60:2 (2017), 221–233.
26. Stanton, N.A., Harris, D., Starr, A., The future flight deck: modeling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Appl. Ergon. 53 (2016), 331–342.
27. Stanton, N.A., Rafferty, L.A., Blane, A., Human factors analysis of accidents in system of systems. J. Battlefield Technol. 15:2 (2012), 23–30.
28. Stanton, N., Salmon, P.M., Rafferty, L.A., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P., Human Factors Methods: a Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. 2013, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
29. Thomas, J., Antoine, B., Fleming, C., Spencer, M., Hommes, Q., Ishimatsu, T., Helferich, J. (2013) STAMP experienced users tutorial., MIT. Retrived from http://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/get_pdf.php?name=1-3-Advanced-Experienced-STPA-Guided-Exercise.pdf.
30. Underwood, P., Waterson, P., A critical review of the STAMP, FRAM and Accimap systemic accident analysis models. Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation, 2012, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 385–394.
31. Underwood, P., Waterson, P., Systemic accident analysis: examining the gap between research and practice. Accid. Anal. Prev. 55 (2013), 154–164.