Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment

Safety Science

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1806-1817

  Kazaras, Konstantinos ^a   Kirytopoulos, Konstantinos ^a   Rentizelas, Athanasios ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Quantitative Risk Assessment; Road tunnels; Safety assessment; STAMP; Systems theory

Indexed keywords

ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS; ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES; PHYSICAL ASPECTS; QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS; ROAD TUNNEL; ROAD TUNNEL SAFETY; SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; SOFTWARE BEHAVIOR; STAMP; SYSTEMS THINKING; TECHNICAL SYSTEMS; TUNNEL VENTILATION SYSTEMS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; ROADS AND STREETS; SYSTEM THEORY; VENTILATION;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENT PRONENESS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROL SYSTEM; EXPLOSION; FIRE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STRUCTURE COLLAPSE; SYSTEMS THEORY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY;

EID: 84863554160     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Apostolakis G. How useful is quantitative risk assessment?. Risk Analysis 2004, 24:515-520.
2. Arralt T.T., Nilsen A.R. Automatic fire detection in road traffic tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2009, 24:75-83.
3. Aven T. Foundations of risk analysis: a knowledge and decision oriented perspective 2003, Wiley, New York.
4. Beard, A.N., Cope, D., 2008. Assessment of the Safety of Tunnels. Commissioned by the European Parliament. Report IP/A/STOA/FWC/2005-28/SC22/29. Published in February 2008 on the European Parliament Web-site Under the Rubric 'Science and Technology, Options Assessment' (STOA).
5. Bier V. Challenges to the acceptance of probabilistic risk analysis. Risk Analysis 1999, 19:703-710.
6. Checkland P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice 1981, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
7. Dianous V., Fiévez C. ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barriers performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 130:220-233.
8. Dix A. Risk management takes on a key role. Tunnel Management International 2004, 7:29-32.
9. Duijm N., Goosens L. Quantifying the influence of safety management on the reliability of safety barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 130:284-292.
10. Dulac, N., Leveson, N.G., 2005. An approach to incorporating safety in early concept formation and system architecture evaluations. In: Lacoste, H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the First IAASS Conference on Space Safety, A New Beginning, pp. 221-226.
11. EU Directive 2004/54/EC, 2004. Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Minimum Safety Requirements for Tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network. European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, Brussels.
12. Garret C., Apostolakis G. Context in the risk assessment of digital system. Risk Analysis 1999, 19:23-32.
13. Haack A. Current safety issues in traffic tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2002, 17:117-127.
14. Hardy K., Guarnieri F. Modelling and hazard analysis for contaminated sediments using stamp model. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2010, 25:737-742.
15. Hoj N.P., Kröger W. Risk analyses of transportation on road and railway from a European Perspective. Safety Science 2002, 40:337-357.
16. Holicky M. Probabilistic risk optimization of road tunnels. Structural Safety 2009, 21:260-266.
17. Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention 2004, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.
18. Kaplan S., Garrick B. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1981, 1:11-28.
19. Kirytopoulos, K., Kazaras, K., 2011. The need for a new approach in road tunnels risk analysis. In: Berenguer, C., Grall, A., Soares (Eds.), Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management. Proceedings of European Safety and Reliability Conference 2011 (ESREL 2011), Trojes, France (18-22 September).
20. Kirytopoulos, K., Rentizelas, A., Kazaras, K., Tatsiopoulos, I., 2010. Quantitative operational risk analysis for dangerous goods transportation through cut and over road tunnels. In: Ale, B., Papazoglu, I., Zio, E. (Eds.), Back to the Future. Proceedings of European Safety and Reliability Conference 2010 (ESREL 2010), Rhodes, Greece (5-9 September).
21. Kontogiannis T., Leopoulos V., Marmaras N. A comparison of accident analysis techniques for safety critical man-machine systems. International Journal of Production Ergonomics 2000, 25:327-347.
22. Lacroix, D., 2001. The Mont Blanc Tunnel fire: what has happened and what has been learned. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Safety in Road and Rail Tunnels, Madrid, pp. 3-16 (2-6 April).
23. Larsson P., Dekker W.A., Tingvall C. The need for a systems theory approach to road safety. Safety Science 2009, 48:1167-1174.
24. Leveson N.G. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science 2004, 42:237-270.
25. Leveson N.G. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events. Safety Science 2011, 49:55-64.
26. Leveson N.G. Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety (Engineering Systems) 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Mohaghegh Z., Mosleh A. Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: principles and theoretical foundations. Safety Science 2009, 47:1139-1158.
28. Nilsson D., Johansson M., Frantzich H. Evacuation experiment in a road tunnel: a study of human behaviour and technical installations. Fire Safety Journal 2009, 44:458-468.
29. Nivolianitou Z., Leopoulos V., Konstantinidou M. Comparison of techniques for accident scenario analysis in hazardous systems. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2004, 17. 476-475.
30. Nývlt O., Prívara S., Ferkl L. Probabilistic risk assessment of highway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2011, 26:71-82.
31. Papazoglou I., Bellamy L., Hale A., Aneziris O., Ale B., Post J., Oh J. I-Risk: development of an integrated technical and management risk methodology for chemical installations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2003, 16:575-591.
32. Pate-Cornell E., Murphy D. Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996, 53:115-126.
33. PIARC, 2007. Integrated Approach to Road Tunnel Safety. World Road Association (PIARC), France.
34. PIARC, 2008a. Risk Analysis for Road Tunnels. World Road Association (PIARC), France.
35. PIARC, 2008b. Human Factors and Road Tunnel Safety Regarding Users. World Road Association (PIARC), France.
36. Quyang M., Hong L., Yu M., Fei Q. STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: taking the China-Jiaoji railway accident for example. Safety Science 2010, 48:544-555.
37. Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science 1997, 27:183-213.
38. Reason J. Human Error 1990, University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents 1997, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot Hants.
40. Santos-Reyes J., Beard A.N. A systemic approach to tunnel fire safety management. The Handbook of Tunnel Fire Safety 2005, 389-406. Thomas Telford, London. A. Beard, R. Carvel (Eds.).
41. Sklet S. Safety barriers: definition, classification and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19:494-506.
42. Skogdalen J., Vinnem J. Quantitative risk analysis offshore-human and organizational factors. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2011, 95:468-479.
43. Steen R., Aven T. A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering. Safety Science 2011, 49:292-297.
44. Svedung I., Rasmussen J. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Safety Science 2002, 40:397-417.
45. Turner, B.A., Pidgeon, N.F., 1997. Man-made Disasters, second ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
46. Weger, D., Kruiskamp, M., Hoeksma, J., 2001. Road tunnel risk assessment in the Netherlands-TUNprim: a spreadsheet model for the calculation of the risks in road tunnels. In: Piccinni (Ed.), ESREL;Proc. International Conference in Safety and Reliability, Torino (16-20 September).
47. Woods D., Dekker S., Cook R., Johannesen L., Sarter N. Behind Human Error 2010, Asghate Publishing Limited, England. second ed.
48. Xiaobo Q., Quiang M., Vivi Y., Yoke H.W. Design and implementation of a quantitative risk assessment software tool for Singapore road tunnels. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38:13827-13834.
49. Zarboutis N., Marmaras N. Designing of formative evacuation plans using agent-based simulation. Safety Science 2007, 45:920-930.
50. Zhuang M., Chun-fu S., Sheng-rui Z. Characteristics of traffic accidents in Chinese freeway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2009, 24:350-355.