A set pair analysis based layer of protection analysis and its application in quantitative risk assessment

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 55, Issue , 2018, Pages 313-319

  Yan, Fang ^a   Xu, Kaili ^b  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Connection degree; Diversity degree; Independent protection layer; Layer of protection analysis; Quantitative risk assessment; Set pair analysis

Indexed keywords

SAFETY ENGINEERING; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

CONNECTION DEGREE; DIVERSITY DEGREE; INDEPENDENT PROTECTION LAYERS; LAYER OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; SET PAIR ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 85049778188     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abdo, H., Flaus, J.M., Uncertainty quantification in dynamics system risk assessment: a new approach with randomness and fuzzy theory. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54:19 (2016), 5862–5885.
2. Baybutt, P., Using layers of protection analysis to evaluate fire and gas systems. Process Saf. Prog. 31:3 (2012), 255–260.
3. Behie, S., Lu, Y., Buxton, G., Slezak, M., Schambach, H., Critical mitigation element methodology: an approach to achieving consistent risk evaluation results. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 44 (2016), 661–670.
4. Bertelsmann, A., One company's observations on the implementation of LOPA. Process Saf. Prog. 36:3 (2017), 284–291.
5. Chang, K., Kim, S., Chang, D., Ahn, J., Zio, E., Uncertainty analysis for target determination in the offshore industry. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 34 (2015), 151–162.
6. Deacon, T., Amyotte, P.,R., Khan, F.,I., Human error risk analysis in offshore emergencies. Saf. Sci. 48:6 (2010), 803–818.
7. DNV, Marine risk Assessment. Report OTO 2001 063, 2002, UK Health and Safety Executive, London.
8. Dowell, A.M., Layer of protection analysis and inherently safer process. Process Saf. Prog 18 (1999), 214–220.
9. Fu, S.S., Yan, X.P., Zhang, D., Li, C.Y., Zio, E., Framework for the quantitative assessment of the risk of leakage from LNG-fueled vessels by an event tree-CFD. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 43 (2016), 42–52.
10. Fuentes-Bargues, J.L., Gonzalez-Cruz, M.C., Gonzalez-Gaya, C., Baixauli-Perez, M.P., Risk analysis of a fuel storage terminal using HAZOP and FTA. Inter. J. Env. Res. Pub. Heal, 14(7), 2017.
11. Gowland, R., The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: a step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment?. J. Hazard Mater. 130:3 (2006), 307–310.
12. Guo, B.B., Jin, X.B., Yang, X.H., Guan, X., Lin, Y.N., Zhou, Y.K., Determining the effects of land consolidation on the multifunctionality of the cropland production system in China using a SPA-fuzzy assessment model. Eur. J. Agron. 63 (2015), 12–26.
13. Jin, J.H., Shuai, B., Wang, X.D., Zhu, Z.G., Theoretical basis of quantification for layer of protection analysis (LOPA). Ann. Nucl. Energy 87 (2016), 69–73.
14. Khalil, M., Abdou, M.A., Mansour, M.S., Farag, H.A., Ossman, M.E., A cascaed fuzzy-LOPA risk assessment model applied in natural gas industry. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 25:6 (2012), 877–882.
15. Kwag, S., Gupta, A., Probabilistic risk assessment framework for structural systems under multiple hazards using Bayesian statistics. Nucl. Eng. Des. 315 (2017), 20–34.
16. Li, C.H., Sun, L., Jia, J.X., Cai, Y.P., Wang, X., Risk assessment of water pollution sources based on an integrated k-means clustering and set pair analysis method in the region of Shiyan, China. Sci. Total Environ 557 (2016), 307–316.
17. Luo, T.Y., Wu, C., Duan, L.X., Fiskbone diagram and risk matrix analysis method and its application in safety assessment of natural gas spherical tank. J. Clean. Prod. 174 (2018), 296–304.
18. Markowski, A.S., Kotynia, A., Bow-tie“ model in layer of protection analysis. Process Saf. Environ 89:4 (2011), 205–213.
19. Pan, Z.W., Wang, Y.H., Jin, J.L., Liu, X.W., Set pair analysis method for coordination evaluation in water resources utilizing conflict. Phys. Chem. Earth 101 (2017), 149–156.
20. Park, K., Simplified risk assessment on fire hazard of LPG filling station. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 34:3 (2017), 642–650.
21. Pasman, H., Rogers, W., Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 26:3 (2013), 434–442.
22. Raka, C., Liangrokapart, J., An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach to risk analysis: a case study of a new generic drug development process. J. Pharm. Innov 12:4 (2017), 319–326.
23. Ramirez-Marengo, C., de Lira-Flores, J., Lopez-Molina, A., Vazquez-Roman, R., Carreto-Vazquez, V., Mannan, M.S., A formulation to optimize the risk reduction process based on LOPA. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 26:3 (2013), 489–494.
24. Saaty, T.L., Alexander, J.M., Conflict Resolution: the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1989, Praeger Publishers, New York.
25. Schmidt, M.S., Villains, victims, and heroes: accounting for the roles human activity plays in LOPA scenarios. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 30 (2014), 256–262.
26. Tong, S.J., Wu, Z.Z., Wang, R.J., Duo, Y.Q., Study on risk assessment of chemical process based on an advanced layers of protection analysis method. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 33:8 (2016), 2291–2297.
27. Torres-Echeverria, A.C., On the use of LOPA and risk graphs for SIL determination. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 41 (2016), 333–343.
28. Wang, W.S., Li, Y.Q., Hazard degree assessment of landslide using set pair analysis method. Nat. Hazards 60:2 (2012), 367–379.
29. Wang, M.W., Xu, P., Li, J., Zhao, K.Y., A novel set pair analysis method based on variable weights for liquefaction evaluation. Nat. Hazards 70:2 (2014), 1527–1534.
30. Wang, Y.C., Jing, H.W., Yu, L.Y., Su, H.J., Luo, N., Set pair analysis for risk assessment of water inrush in Karst tunnels. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 76:3 (2017), 1199–1207.
31. Wang, D., Borthwick, A.G., He, H.D., Wang, Y.K., Zhu, J.Y., Lu, Y., Xu, P.C., Zeng, X.K., Wu, J.C., Wang, L.C., Zou, X.Q., Liu, J.F., Zou, Y., He, R.M., A hybrid wavelet de-noising and rank-set pair analysis approach for forecasting hydro-meteorological time series. Environ. Res. 160 (2018), 269–281.
32. Weirick, M.L., Manjunath, K., Short communication: dust explosion scenario identification for layers of protection analysis (LOPA). Part. Sci. Technol. 27:1 (2009), 89–96.
33. Yan, F., Xu, K.L., Li, D.S., Zhang, X.M., Hazard assessment for biomass gasification station using general set pair analysis. Bioresources 11:4 (2016), 8307–8324.
34. Yan, F., Xu, K.L., Yao, X.W., Li, Y., Fuzzy Bayesian Network-bow-tie analysis of gas leakage during biomass gasification. PLoS One 11:7 (2016), 1–21.
35. Yang, X.H., Zhang, X.J., Hu, X.X., Yang, Z.F., Li, J.Q., Nonlinear optimization set pair analysis model (NOSPAM) for assessing water resource renewability. Nonlinear Process Geophys. 18:5 (2011), 599–607.
36. Yao, X.W., Xu, K.L., Li, Y., Physicochemical properties and possible applications of waste corncob fly ash from biomass gasification industries of China. Bioresources 11:2 (2016), 3783–3798.
37. Yun, G.W., Rogers, W.J., Mannan, M.S., Risk assessment of LNG importation terminals using the Bayesian-LOPA methodology. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 22:1 (2009), 91–96.