A novel set pair analysis method based on variable weights for liquefaction evaluation

Natural Hazards

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1527-1534

  Wang, Ming Wu ^a   Xu, Peng ^a   Li, Jian ^a   Zhao, Kui Yuan ^a  

^a HEFEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Liquefaction; Set pair analysis; Weight

Indexed keywords

HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; LIQUEFACTION; PAVEMENT; ROAD TRANSPORT; SOIL MECHANICS; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84891081046     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0887-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baziara MH, Nilipour N (2003) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using neural-networks and CPT results. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(7): 631-636.
2. Chen YR, Hsieha SC, Che JW, Shih CC (2005) Energy-based probabilistic evaluation of soil liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(1): 55-68.
3. Chern SG, Lee CY, Wang CC (2008) CPT-based liquefaction assessment by using fuzzy-neural network. J Mar Sci Technol 16(2): 139-148.
4. Huang Z, Wang G, Li Q, Zhao M (2008) Rank evaluation of sand liquefaction based on extenics. J Shandong Univ (Engineering Science Ed) 38(5): 31-35.
5. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(2-4): 115-130.
6. Jin JL, Wei YM, Zou LL, Liu L, Fu J (2012) Risk evaluation of China's natural disaster systems: an approach based on triangular fuzzy numbers and stochastic simulation. Nat Hazards 62(1): 129-139.
7. Johari A, Khodaparast AR (2013) Modelling of probability liquefaction based on standard penetration tests using the jointly distributed random variables method. Eng Geol 158: 1-14.
8. Juang CH, Yuan H, Lee DH, Lin PS (2003) Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotechnol Geoenviron Eng 129(1): 66-80.
9. Liu Y (2009) Extension clustering prediction method for evaluation of seismic liquefaction of saturated sandy soil. Rock Soil Mech 30(7): 1939-1944.
10. Liu H, Xue X (2004) Artificial neural network model for prediction of seismic liquefaction of sand soil. Rock Soil Mech 25(12): 1942-1950.
11. Lopez-Caballero F, Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi A (2010) Assessment of variability and uncertainties effects on the seismic response of a liquefiable soil profile. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(7): 600-613.
12. Rezania M, Javadi AA, Giustolisi O (2010) Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT results using evolutionary polynomial regression. Comput Geotech 37(1-2): 82-92.
13. Samui P, Kim D, Sitharam TG (2011) Support vector machine for evaluating seismic-liquefaction potential using shear wave velocity. J Appl Geophys 73(1): 8-15.
14. Wang M (2012) Dynamic centrifuge tests and numerical modelling for geotechnical earthquake engineering in liquefiable soils. Science Press, Beijing.
15. Wang M, Chen G (2011) A novel coupling model for risk analysis of swell and shrinkage of expansive soils. Comput Math Appl 62(7): 2854-2861.
16. Wang M, Luo G (2000) Application of reliability analysis to assessment of sand liquefaction potential. Chin J Geotechn Eng 22(5): 542-544.
17. Wang M, Jin J, Li L (2004) Application of PP method based on RAGA to assessment of sand liquefaction potential. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(4): 631-634.
18. Wang M, Li L, Jin J (2010) Application of unascertained number theory to risk evaluation of liquefaction grade. Chin J Geotechn Eng 32(2): 303-307.
19. Yang XH, Zhang XJ, Hu XX (2011) Nonlinear optimization set pair analysis model (NOSPAM) for assessing water resource renewability. Nonlinear Process Geophys 18: 599-607.
20. Zhao K (2000) Set pair analysis and its preliminary application. Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, Hangzhou.
21. Zhao Y, Yang L (2000) Grey synthetical evaluation of liquefaction of sands. J Natural Disasters 9(1): 74-79.