Uncertainty analysis for target SIL determination in the offshore industry

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 34, Issue , 2015, Pages 151-162

  Chang, Kwangpil ^a   Kim, Sungteak ^a   Chang, Daejun ^b   Ahn, Junkeon ^b   Zio, Enrico ^c,d  

^a Hyundai Heavy Industries   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^c ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

^d POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fuzzy set; LOPA; Minimum sil tablefrom OLF70; Montefulation; Offshore industry; Risk graph method; SIL determination; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; FUZZY SETS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

LOPA; MINIMUM SIL TABLEFROM OLF70; MONTEFULATION; OFFSHORE INDUSTRY; RISK GRAPHS; SIL DETERMINATIONS;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

EID: 84922357758     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrahamsson M. Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk Analysis - Characterization and Methods of Treatment 2002, (Doctoral thesis), Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
2. Abul-Haggag O.Y., Barakat W. Application of fuzzy logic for the determination of safety integrity in light of IEC 61508 & 61511 standards. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2013, 3:41-48.
3. Arunraj N.S., Mandal S., Maiti J. Modeling uncertainty in risk assessment: an integrated approach with fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013, 55:242-255.
4. Aven T., Zio E. Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making. J.Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96:64-74.
5. Aven T., Zio E. Model output uncertainty in risk assessment. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 2013, 9(5):475-486.
6. Baraldi P., Flage R., Aven T., Zio E. Uncertainty in Risk Assessment 2014, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
7. CCPS Layer of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment 2001, CCPS, NY, USA.
8. Elaamvazuthi I., Vasant P., Webb J. The application of Mamdani fuzzy model for auto zoom function of a digital camera. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inform. Secur. 2009, 6:244-249.
9. Flage R., Baraldi P., Zio E., Aven T. Probability and possibility-based representations of uncertainty in fault tree analysis. Risk Anal. 2013, 33(1):121-133.
10. IEC 61508 Functional Safety of Electrical/electronic/programmable Electronic Safety-related Systems 2010, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
11. IEC 61511 Functional Safety-safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry 2010, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
12. Innal F., Dutuit Y., Chebila M. Monte Carlo analysis and fuzzy sets for uncertainty propagation in SIS performance assessment. Int. J. Math. Comput. Phys. Quantum Eng. 2013, 7(11):1063-1071.
13. Janbu A.F. Treatment of Uncertainties in Reliability Assessment of Safety Instrumented Systems 2009, (Master's thesis), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
14. Jin H., Lundteigen M.A., Rausand M. Uncertainty assessment of reliability estimates for safety instrumented systems. Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 (ESREL 2012) 2012, 2213-2221. London.
15. Kim S., Chang K., Kim Y. Risk-based design for implementation of SIS functional safety in the offshore industry. Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2013 (ESREL 2013) 2013, 1875-1880. London.
16. Lundteigen M.A. Safety Instrumented Systems in the Oil and Gas Industry: Concepts and Methods for Safety and Reliability Assessments in Design and Operation 2009, (Doctoral thesis), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
17. NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners 2002, (Technical report), NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington, DC.
18. Nati-Said R., Zidani F., Ouzraoui N. Fuzzy risk graph model for determining safety integrity level. Int. J. Qual. Stat., Reliab. 2008, 2008. article ID 263895.
19. OLF-070 Application of IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry 2004, (Technical report), The Norwegian Oil Industry Association, Stavanger, Norway.
20. Ouache R., Adham A. Safety instrumented systems between reliability and fuzzy. Int. J. Inform. Syst. Eng. 2014, 2(1):173-185.
21. Rausand M. Reliability of Safety-critical Systems 2014, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.
22. Simon C., Sallak M., Aubry J.F. SIL allocation of SIS by aggregation of experts' opinions. Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2007 (ESREL 2007) 2007, (Stavanger, Norway).
23. Sintef Reliability Prediction Methods for Safety Instrumented Systems, PDS Method Handbook 2013, Sintef, Trondheim, Norway.
24. Sintef Reliability Data for Safety Instrumented Systems, PDS Data Handbook 2013, Sintef, Trondheim, Norway.
25. Zio E., Aven T. Industrial disasters: extreme events, extremely rare. Some reflections on the treatment of uncertainties in the assessment of the associated risks. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2013, 91:31-45.
26. Zio E. The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis 2013, Springer, London, UK.