Set pair analysis method for coordination evaluation in water resources utilizing conflict

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth

Volumn 101, Issue , 2017, Pages 149-156

  Pan, Zhengwei ^a   Wang, Yanhua ^a   Jin, Juliang ^b   Liu, Xiaowei ^b  

^a Key Laboratory of Building Structure of Anhui Colleges and Universities   (China)

^b HEFEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bidirectional connection number; Coordination evaluation; The Yellow River basin; Water resource conflicts

Indexed keywords

WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

BI-DIRECTIONAL CONNECTIONS; COORDINATION DEGREE; COORDINATION EVALUATION; COORDINATION MANAGEMENTS; RESOURCE CONFLICT; WATER RESOURCE SYSTEMS; WATER RESOURCES UTILIZATIONS; YELLOW RIVER BASIN;

RIVERS;

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESOURCE SCARCITY; RESOURCE USE; RIVER BASIN; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE; WATER SUPPLY;

CHINA; YELLOW RIVER BASIN;

EID: 85019599738     PISSN: 14747065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2017.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Apipalakul, C., Wirojangud, W., Ngang, T.K., Development of community participation on water resource conflict management. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 186 (2015), 325–330, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.048.
2. Feng, L.H., Sang, G.S., Hong, W.H., Statistical prediction of changes in water resources trends based on set pair analysis. Water Resour. Manag. 28:6 (2014), 1703–1711, 10.1007/s11269-014-0581-7.
3. Funder, M., Mweemba, C., Nyambe, I., van Koppen, B., Ravnborg, H.M., Understanding local water conflict and cooperation: the case of Namwala District, Zambia. Phys. Chem. Earth 35 (2010), 758–764, 10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.022.
4. General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, Notice of the general office of the state Council on forwarding the report of the state development planning commission and the Ministry of water resources and hydropower on the water supply distribution scheme of the Yellow River. [1987-09-11]. http://www.gov.cn/xxgk/pub/govpublic/mrlm/201103/t20110330_63799.html, 1987.
5. Getirana, A.C.V., Malta, V.F., de Azevedo, J.P.S., Decision process in a water use conflict in Brazil. Water Resour. Manag. 22:1 (2008), 103–118, 10.1007/s11269-006-9146-8.
6. Giordano, R., Passarella, G., Uricchio, V.F., Vurro, M., Fuzzy cognitive maps for issue identification in a water resources conflict resolution system. Phys. Chem. Earth 30:6–7 (2005), 463–469, 10.1016/j.pce.2005.06.012.
7. Guo, Yajun, Theory and Methodology of Synthesis Evaluation. 2002, Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese).
8. GWP (Global Water Partnership), Integrated Water Resources Management. TAC Background Paper No. 4. 2000, GWP, Stockholm, Sweden SE-105 25.
9. Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, Liping, Peng, Xiaoyong, The decision support system GMCR II in negotiations over groundwater contamination. Syst Man, Cybern 1999 IEEE SMC’99 Conference Proceedings. 1999. IEEE Int. Conf. 5 (1999), 942–948, 10.1109/ICSMC.1999.815681.
10. Jin, Juliang, Wei, Yiming, Generalized Intelligent Evaluation Method for Complex System and its Application. 2008, Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese).
11. Jin, Juliang, Wei, Yiming, Zou, Lele, Liu, Li, Zhang, Weiwei, Zhou, Yuliang, Forewarning of sustainable utilization of regional water resources: a model based on BP neural network and set pair analysis. Nat. Hazards 62:1 (2012), 115–127, 10.1007/s11069-011-0037-9.
12. Kerachian, R., Fallahnia, M., Bazargan-Lari, M.R., Mansoori, A., Sedghi, H., A fuzzy game theoretic approach for groundwater resources management: application of Rubinstein Bargaining theory. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54:10 (2010), 673–682, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.008.
13. Kundzewicz, Z.W., Kowalczak, P., The potential for water conflict is on the increase. Nature, 459(7243), 2009, 10.1038/459031a 31–31.
14. Liu, K.K., Li, C.H., Yang, X.L., Hu, J., Xia, X.H., Water resources supply-consumption (demand) balance analyses in the Yellow River basin in 2009. Procedia Environ. Sci. 13 (2012), 1956–1965, 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.189.
15. Loucks, D.P., Analytical aids to conflict management. ViessmanW, Smerdon, E.T., (eds.) Managing Water-related Conflicts: the Engineers Role, 1990, ASCE, NY, 23–37.
16. Mianabadi, H., Mostert, E., Zarghami, M., van de Giesen, N., A new bankruptcy method for conflict resolution in water resources allocation. J. Environ. Manag. 144 (2014), 152–159, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.018.
17. Pan, Zhengwei, Jin, Juliang, Liu, Li, Liu, Xiaowei, Risk evaluation of natural disasters based on connection function. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 11:2 (2013), 118–124, 10.1080/10042857.2013.777522.
18. Pan, Zhengwei, Wu, Chengguo, Jin, Juliang, Set Pair Analysis Methods for Water Resource System Evaluation and Prediction. 2016, Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese).
19. Salazar, R., Szidarovszky, F., Coppola, E. Jr., Rojano, A., Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. J. Environ. Manag. 84:4 (2007), 560–571, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.011.
20. Urtiga, M.M., Morais, D.C., Pre-negotiation framework to promote cooperative negotiations in water resource conflicts through value creation approach. EURO J. Decis. Process 3:3–4 (2015), 339–356, 10.1007/s40070-015-0052-2.
21. Wolf, A.T., Shared waters: conflict and cooperation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32 (2007), 241–269, 10.1146/annurev.energy32.041006.101434.
22. Zhao, Keqin, Set Pair Analysis and Preliminary Application. 2000, Zhejiang Science Technology Press, Hangzhou (In Chinese).
23. Zuo, Qiting, Harmony theory: Theory, Method and Application. second ed., 2016, Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese).