Developmental relationship between declarative metacognitive knowledge and reading comprehension during secondary school

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 397-416

  Edossa, Ashenafi Kassahun ^a   Neuenhaus, Nora ^a   Artelt, Cordula ^a,b   Lingel, Klaus ^c   Schneider, Wolfgang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi)   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Declarative metacognitive knowledge; Development; Developmental relationship; Latent growth curve analysis; Reading comprehension; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049218717     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: 18785174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-018-0393-x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abedi, J., Bailey, A., Butler, F., Castellon-Wellington, M., Leon, S., & Mirocha, J. (2005). The validity of administering large-scale content assessments to English language learners: an investigation from three perspectives. CSE Report 663. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
2. Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15(1), 1–37.
3. Allon, M., Gutkin, T. B., & Bruning, R. (1994). The relationship between metacognition and intelligence in normal adolescents: some tentative but surprising findings. Psychology in the Schools, 31(2), 93–97.
4. Annevirta, T., Laakkonen, E., Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (2007). Developmental dynamics of metacognitive knowledge and text comprehension skill in the first primary school years. Metacognition and Learning, 2(1), 21–39. 10.1007/s11409-007-9005-x.
5. Artelt, C., Naumann, J., & Schneider, W. (2010). Lesemotivation und Lernstrategien.
6. Artelt, C., Neuenhaus, N., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2012). Entwicklung und wechselseitige Effekte von metakognitiven und bereichsspezifischen Wissenskomponenten in der Sekundarstufe. Psychologische Rundschau.
7. Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2015). Cross-Country Generalizability of the Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Students’ Strategy Use and Reading Competence. Teachers College Record, 117(1), n1.
8. Artelt, C., Demmrich, A. & Baumert, J. (2001). Selbstreguliertes Lernen. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, P. Stanat, K.-J. Tillmann & M. Weiß (Hrsg.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (S. 271-298).
9. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: a case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 343–364.
10. Baumert, J., Nagy, G., & Lehmann, R. (2012). Cumulative advantages and the emergence of social and ethnic inequality: Matthew effects in reading and mathematics development within elementary schools? Child Development, 83(4), 1347–1367.
11. Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 205-223. DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185.62.4.251
12. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective (Vol. 467). Wiley.
13. Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1–42). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
14. Brand, S., Opwis, K., Hatzinger, M., & Holsboer-Trachsler, E. (2010). REM-sleep is related to the transfer of implicit procedural knowledge following metacognitive learning. Somnology, 14, 213-220.
15. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P. H. Musen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.
17. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.
18. Carroll, M. (2008). Metacognition in the classroom. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 411–427). New York: Psychological.
19. Catts, H. W., Bridges, M. S., Little, T. D., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Reading achievement growth in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1569–1579.
20. DeLucia, C., & Pitts, S. C. (2006). Applications of individual growth curve modeling for pediatric psychology research. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31(10), 1002–1023. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj074.
21. Edossa, A. K., Schroeders, U., Weinert, S., & Artelt, C. (2017). The development of emotional and behavioral self-regulation and their effects on academic achievement in childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10.1177/0165025416687412.
22. Elshout, J. J., & Veenman, M. V. (1992). Relation between intellectual ability and working method as predictors of learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 134–143.
23. Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Metamemory (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
24. Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (2001). Learning difficulties and foreign language learning: a review of research and instruction. Language Teaching, 34(2), 79–98.
25. Heller, K., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12+ R) [Cognitive capability test for grades 4 to 12; revision].
26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118.
27. Lee, J. (2010). Tripartite growth trajectories of reading and math achievement: tracking national academic progress at primary, middle, and high school levels. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 800–832.
28. Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & NURMI, J. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 72–93.
29. Lerkkanen, M.-K., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Reading performance and its developmental trajectories during the first and the second grade. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 111–130. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.006.
30. Lingel, K., Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2010). Metakognitives Wissen in der Sekundarstufe: Konstruktion und Evaluation domänenspezifischer Messverfahren. Projekt EWIKO.
31. Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2011). Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: general or domain-specific? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 163–178.
32. Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2013). The Impact of Cross-curricular Competences and Prior Knowledge on Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4). 10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p214.
33. Otto, B., & Kistner, S. (2017). Is there a Matthew effect in self-regulated learning and mathematical strategy application?—assessing the effects of a training program with standardized learning diaries. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 75–86. 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.005.
34. Paris, S. G. (2002). When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 105–120). Boston: Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-4615-1099-4_8.
35. Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293–316.
36. Paris, S. G., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609–640). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Parrila, R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J.-E., & Kirby, J. R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 299–319.
38. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715–729.
39. Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.
40. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43–98). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
41. Pressley, M., Borkwski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 857–867.
42. R Development Core Team. (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 2.13.2). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
43. Rescorla, L., & Rosenthal, A. S. (2004). Growth in standardized ability and achievement test scores from 3rd to 10th grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 85–96.
44. Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: how advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press.
45. Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., … Barendse, M. (2015). Package “lavaan”.
46. Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114–121.
47. Schneider, W. (2015). The development of metamemory. In Memory development from early childhood through emerging adulthood (pp. 255–308). New York: Springer.
48. Schneider, W. (1985). Developmental trends in the metamemory-memory behavior relationship:an integrative review. In D.-L. Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (pp. 57–109). Orlando: Academic Press.
49. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
50. Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M., & Visé, M. (1998). The impact of metamemory and domain-specific knowledge on memory performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(1), 91–103.
51. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.
52. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.
53. Shin, T., Davison, M. L., Long, J. D., Chan, C.-K., & Heistad, D. (2013). Exploring gains in reading and mathematics achievement among regular and exceptional students using growth curve modeling. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 92–100. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.002.
54. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.
55. Thorpe, K. J., & Satterly, D. J. H. (1990). The development and inter-relationship of metacognitive components among primary school children. Educational Psychology, 10(1), 5–21. 10.1080/0144341900100102.
56. Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89–109. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004.