Metacognition in the classroom

Handbook of Metamemory and Memory

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 411-427

  Carroll, Marie ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866767190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203805503     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
2. Bharucha, J. (2006). Education as we know it does not accomplish what we believe it does. Retrieved February 27, 2007 from http://www.edge.org/q2006/q06_10.html#bharucha
3. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 717-726.
4. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514-527.
5. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642.
6. Carroll, M., Davis, R., & Conway, M. (2001). The effects of self-reference on recognition and source attribution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 140-145.
7. Carroll, M., & Korukina, S. (1999). The effect of context and modality on metamemory judgments. Memory, 7, 309-322.
8. Carroll, M., Mazzoni, G., Andrews, S., & Pocock, P. (1999). Monitoring the future: Object and source memory for real and imagined events. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 373-390.
9. Carroll, M., & Nelson, T.O. (1993). Effects of overlearning on the feeling of knowing are more detectable in within-subject than between-subject designs. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 227-235.
10. Carroll, M., Nelson, T. O., & Kirwan, A. (1997). Trade-off of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effect on metamemory and long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 95, 239-253.
11. Carroll, M., & Simington, A. (1986). The effects of degree of learning, meaning, and individual differences on the feeling-of-knowing. Acta Psychologica, 61, 3-16.
12. Cook, G., Marsh, R., & Hicks, J. (2006). Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 828-835.
13. Dunlosky, J., Baker, J., Rawson, K., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Does aging influence people’s metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning. Psychology and Aging, 21, 390-400.
14. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker (Ed.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp 249-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
16. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779-788.
17. Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392-399.
18. Harten, A. C. M. (2000). An investigation of calibration of comprehension: Text processing variables that affect college students’ evaluation of their comprehension. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60 (9A) 3270.
19. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., & Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 29, 22-34.
20. Hicks, J., & Marsh, R. L. (2002). On predicting the future states of awareness for recognition of unrecallable items. Memory & Cognition, 30, 60-66.
21. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 126, 582-590.
22. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187-194.
23. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006a). Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners’ sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test. Memory and Cognition, 34, 959-972.
24. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006b). Mending metacognitive illusions: A comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1133-1145.
25. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
26. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., and Ma’ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162.
27. Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609-622.
28. Lefevre, N., & Lories, G. (2004). Text cohesion and metacomprehension: Immediate and delayed judgments. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1238-1254.
29. Leonesio, R. J., & Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 464-470.
30. Mannes, S. (1994). Strategic processing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 577-588.
31. Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91-115.
32. Mazzoni, G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study-time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47-60.
33. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Towards a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645-656.
34. McDaniel, M. A., & Fisher, R. P. (1991). Test and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192-201.
35. McDaniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representation through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371-385.
36. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kinstch W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
37. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349-363.
38. Miles, J., & Stine-Morrow, E. (2004). Adult age differences in self-regulated learning from reading sentences. Psychology and Aging, 19, 626-636.
39. Muramoto, T. (1996). Test recall and text recognition with and without a title. Japanese Psychological Research, 38, 240-244.
40. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
41. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed-JOL effect.” Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
42. Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the “laboin-vain effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676-686.
43. Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R., Shimamura, A., Landwehr, R., & Narens, L. (1982). Overlearning and the feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 279-288.
44. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp 125-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53-69.
47. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2005). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
48. Shaddock, A., & Carroll, M. (1997). Influences on metamemory judgements. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49, 21-27.
49. Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 907-912.
50. Thiede, K. W. (1996). The relative importance of anticipated test format and anticipated test difficulty on performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 901-918.
51. Thiede, K., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
52. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
53. Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
54. Weaver, C. A., III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 12-22.
55. Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: econciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240-245.
56. Wiley, J., Griffin, T., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 408-428.