Growth in Standardized Ability and Achievement Test Scores from 3rd to 10th Grade

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-96

  Rescorla, Leslie ^a   Rosenthal, Adena S ^a,b  

^a BRYN MAWR COLLEGE   (United States)

^b REPLIGEN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642392220     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.85     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.) New York: Macmillan.
2. Antonak, R. F. (1988). Relationships between group IQ and scholastic achievement at Grades two, four, and six. Educational Research Quarterly, 12, 23-29.
3. Antonak, R. F., King, S., & Lowy, J. J. (1982). Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Stanford Achievement Test, and three demographic variables as predictors of achievement in Grades 2 and 4. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 366-373.
4. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Applications of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Cadieux, A., Boudreault, P., & Laberge, J. (1997). The Otis-Lennon School Ability Test as a predictor of grade repetition and academic performance. Psychological Reports, 81, 223-226.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
8. Crano, W. D., Kenny, D. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Does intelligence cause achievement? A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 258-275.
9. Crijnen, A. A. M., Feehan, M., & Kellam, S. G. (1998). The course and malleability of reading achievement in elementary school: The application of growth curve modeling in the evaluation of a mastery learning intervention. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 137-157.
10. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1981). CTBS/4 technical report manual. Monterey, CA: Author.
11. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1983). Test of Cognitive Skills technical report manual. Monwrey, CA: Author.
12. Gelman, E. S. (1985). CTBS Form U & V. In D. Keyser & R. Sweetland (Eds.), Test critiques (Vol. 2, pp. 186-197). Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.
13. Harnqvist, K. (1968). Relative changes in intelligence from 13 to 18. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 50-82.
14. Jensen, A. J. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
15. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L. B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586-597.
16. Kamphaus, R. W., Slotkin, J., & DeVincentis, C. (1990). Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children. New York: Guilford Press.
17. Linn, R. L. (1985). Educational testing and assessment: Research needs and policy issues. American Psychologist, 41, 1153-1160.
18. McCall, R. B., Appelbaum, M. I., & Hogarty, P. S. (1973). Developmental changes in mental performance. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(3, Serial No. 150), 1-83.
19. Muthen, B. O., & Khoo, S. T. (1998). Longitudinal studies of achievement growth using latent variable modeling. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 73-101.
20. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). Retrieved March 3, 2002, from U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/esea/
21. An overview of M_ and other suburbs. (1997, February 9). The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B1.
22. Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., Osmond, W. C., & Maynard, A. M. (2002). Relative reading achievement: A longitudinal study of 187 children from first through sixth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 3-13.
23. Piacentini-Flynn, P. Y. (1999). Differential achievement patterns over time among six elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
24. Plewis, I. (1993). Reading progress. In G. Woodhouse (Ed.), A guide to ML3 for new users (pp. 98-124). London: University of London, Institute of Education.
25. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. K., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
26. Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed,). La Mesa, CA: Author.
27. Scarborough, H. S., & Parker, J. D. (2003). Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ, and psychological problems from Grade 2 to Grade 8. Annals of Dyslexia, 95, 211-224.
28. Shaywitz, B. A., Holford, T. R., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995). A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading: Results from a longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 894-906.
29. Wilkoff, R. L., & Parolini, R. L. (1982). Prediction of the WISC-R Full Scale IQ from the SFTAA. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 387-388.
30. Williamson, G. L., Appelbaum, M., & Epanchin, A. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of academic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 61-76.