Monitoring in collaborative learning: Co-occurrence of observed behavior and physiological synchrony explored

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 87, Issue , 2018, Pages 337-347

  Haataja, Eetu ^a   Malmberg, Jonna ^a   Järvelä, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Monitoring; Physiological synchrony; Self regulated learning; Video data

Indexed keywords

MONITORING; QUALITY CONTROL; STUDENTS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VIDEO RECORDING;

BEHAVIORAL PROCESS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROCESS; ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY; HIGH-SCHOOL STUDENTS; PHYSIOLOGICAL SYNCHRONY; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; VIDEO DATA;

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 85048455479     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ahonen, L., Cowley, B.U., Hellas, A., Puolamäki, K., Biosignals reflect pair-dynamics in collaborative work: EDA and ECG study of pair-programming in a classroom environment. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2018, 3138 http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21518-3.
2. Ahonen, L., Cowley, B., Torniainen, J., Ukkonen, A., Vihavainen, A., Puolamäki, K., Cognitive collaboration found in cardiac physiology: Study in classroom environment. PLoS One, 11(7), 2016, e0159178 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159178.
3. Azevedo, R., Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 40:4 (2005), 199–209 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2.
4. Azevedo, R., Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self- and socially-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning 9:2 (2014), 217–228 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9123-1.
5. Azevedo, R., Taub, M., Mudrick, N., Farnsworth, J., Martin, S.A., Interdisciplinary research methods used to investigate emotions with advanced learning technologies. Zembylas, M., Schutz, P.A., (eds.) Methodological advances in research on emotion and education, 2016, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 231–243 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29049-2_18.
6. Baker, M.J., Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies 16:3 (2015), 451–473 http://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bak.
7. Bandura, A., Cioffi, D., Ban-Taylor, C., Brouillard, M.E., Perceived self-efficacy in coping with cognitive stressors and opioid activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:3 (1988), 479–488 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.479.
8. Bandura, A., Reese, L., Adams, N.E., Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43:1 (1982), 5–21 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.5.
9. Barrett, L.F., The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12:1 (2017), 1–23 http://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154.
10. Ben-Shakhar, G., Standardization within individuals: A simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. Psychophysiology 22:3 (1985), 292–299 http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01603.x.
11. Boekaerts, M., Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7:2 (1997), 161–186 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1.
12. Chernick, M., LaBudde, R., An introduction to bootstrap methods with applications to R. 2011, Wiley, Hoboken NJ.
13. Cornejo, C., Cuadros, Z., Morales, R., Paredes, J., Interpersonal coordination: Methods, achievements, and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology 8:September (2017), 1–16 http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01685.
14. Critchley, H.D., Eccles, J., Garfinkel, S.N., Interaction between cognition, emotion, and the autonomic nervous system. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 117:October (2013), 59–77 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53491-0.00006-7.
15. Critchley, H.D., Garfinkel, S.N., The influence of physiological signals on cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 19 (2018), 13–18 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.014.
16. Dawson, M.E., Schell, A.M., Filion, D.L., The electrodermal system. Cacioppo, J.T., Tassinary, L.G., Berntson, G.G., (eds.) Handbook of psychophysiology, 2017, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 217–243 http://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415782.010.
17. Dignath, C., Büttner, G., Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning 3:3 (2008), 231–264 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x.
18. Dindar M., Malmberg J., Järvelä S., Haataja E., & Kirschner P. A. (submitted for publication) Matching self-reports with electrodermal activity data: Investigating temporal changes in self-regulated learning.
19. D'Mello, S., Dieterle, E., Duckworth, A., Advanced, analytic, automated (aaa) measurement of engagement during learning. Educational Psychologist 52:2 (2017), 104–123 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1281747.
20. Efklides, A., Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist 46:1 (2011), 6–25 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645.
21. Efklides, A., Samara, A., Petropoulou, M., Feeling of difficulty: An aspect of monitoring that influences control. European Journal of Psychology of Education 14:4 (1999), 461–476 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172973.
22. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A., Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87:3 (1980), 215–251 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215.
23. Feldman, R., Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 48:3–4 (2007), 329–354 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x.
24. Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C.W., Affect regulation and synchrony in mother—infant play as precursors to the development of symbolic competence. Infant Mental Health Journal 18:1 (1997), 4–23, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199721)18:1<4::AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-R.
25. Flavell, J.H., Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34:10 (1979), 906–911 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
26. Garbarino, M., Lai, M., Tognetti, S., Picard, R., Bender, D., Empatica E3-A wearable wireless multi-sensor device for real-time computerized biofeedback and data acquisition. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on wireless mobile communication and healthcare - “transforming healthcare through innovations in mobile and wireless technologies” (pp. 39–42), 2014, ICST https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.mobihealth.2014.257418.
27. Garfinkel, S.N., Zorab, E., Navaratnam, N., Engels, M., Mallorquí-Bagué N., Minati, L., et al. Anger in brain and body: The neural and physiological perturbation of decision-making by emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11:1 (2016), 150–158 https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv099.
28. Gillies, R.M., Carroll, A., Cunnington, R., Rafter, M., Palghat, K., Bednark, J., et al. Multimodal representations during an inquiry problem-solving activity in a year 6 science class: A case study investigating cooperation, physiological arousal and belief states. Australian Journal of Education 60:2 (2016), 111–127 https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116650701.
29. Greene, J.A., Azevedo, R., A theoretical review of winne and hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research 77:3 (2007), 334–372 https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303953.
30. Hadwin, A.F., Järvelä S., Miller, M., Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H., (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 2011, Routledge, New York, 65–86.
31. Hadwin, A.F., Järvelä S., Miller, M., Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. Schunk, D.H., Greene, J.A., (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 2018, Routledge, New York, 83–106.
32. Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., Simons, R.F., To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology 40:6 (2003), 895–903 https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00107.
33. Harley, J.M., Bouchet, F., Hussain, M.S., Azevedo, R., Calvo, R., A multi-componential analysis of emotions during complex learning with an intelligent multi-agent system. Computers in Human Behavior 48 (2015), 615–625 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.013.
34. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Chinn, C.A., Collaborative learning. Corno, L., Anderman, E.M., (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology, 3rd ed., 2015, Routledge, New York, 349–363.
35. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., Salonen, P., Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction 21:3 (2011), 379–393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002.
36. Järvelä S., Hadwin, A., Promoting and researching adaptive regulation: New Frontiers for CSCL research. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 559–561 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.006.
37. Järvelä S., Järvenoja, H., Veermans, M., Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research 47:2 (2008), 122–135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.012.
38. Järvelä S., Kirschner, P.A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., et al. Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research & Development 63:1 (2015), 125–142 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.
39. Järvelä S., Kivikangas, J.M., Kätsyri, J., Ravaja, N., Physiological linkage of dyadic gaming experience. Simulation & Gaming 45:1 (2014), 24–40 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113513080.
40. Järvelä S., Malmberg J., Haataja E., Sobocinski M., & Kirschner P. A., (submitted for publication). What multimodal data can tell us about the students’ regulation of their learning process?.
41. Järvenoja, H., Järvelä S., Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges?. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79:3 (2009), 463–481 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811.
42. Järvenoja, H., Järvelä S., Regulating emotions together for motivated collaboration. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., (eds.) Affective learning Together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, New York, 162–181 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069684.
43. Kaplan, H.B., Physiological correlates (GSR) of affect in small groups. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 11:2 (1967), 173–179 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(67)90004-9.
44. Karvonen, A., Kykyri, V.-L., Kaartinen, J., Penttonen, M., Seikkula, J., Sympathetic nervous system synchrony in couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 42:3 (2016), 383–395 https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12152.
45. Keskinarkaus, A., Huttunen, S., Siipo, A., Holappa, J., Laszlo, M., Juuso, I., et al. MORE – a multimodal observation and analysis system for social interaction research. Multimedia Tools and Applications 75:11 (2016), 6321–6345 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2574-9.
46. Knight, A.P., Kennedy, D.M., McComb, S.A., Using recurrence analysis to examine group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 20:3 (2016), 223–241 https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000046.
47. Kreibig, S.D., Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology 84:3 (2010), 394–421 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010.
48. Kreibig, S.D., Gendolla, G.H.E., Scherer, K.R., Goal relevance and goal conduciveness appraisals lead to differential autonomic reactivity in emotional responding to performance feedback. Biological Psychology 91:3 (2012), 365–375 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.08.007.
49. Kristoufek, L., Detrending moving-average cross-correlation coefficient: Measuring cross-correlations between non-stationary series. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 406 (2014), 169–175 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.015.
50. Lee, A., O'Donnell, A.M., Rogat, T.K., Exploration of the cognitive regulatory sub-processes employed by groups characterized by socially shared and other-regulation in a CSCL context. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 617–627 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.072.
51. Liu, S., Zhou, Y., Palumbo, R., Wang, J.-L., Dynamical correlation: A new method for quantifying synchrony with multivariate intensive longitudinal data. Psychological Methods 21:3 (2016), 291–308 https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000071.
52. Malmberg, J., Järvelä S., Järvenoja, H., Panadero, E., Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high- and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 562–572 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082.
53. Malmberg J., Järvelä S., Haataja E., Huang H., Siipo A., & Holappa. (submitted for publication) Going beyond what is visible: What multichannel data can reveal about interaction in the context of collaborative learning.
54. Marci, C.D., Ham, J., Moran, E., Orr, S.P., Physiologic correlates of perceived therapist empathy and social-emotional process during psychotherapy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 195:2 (2007), 103–111 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000253731.71025.fc.
55. Mikroyannidis, A., Okada, A., Scott, P., Rusman, E., Specht, M., Stefanov, K., et al. WeSPOT: A personal and social approach to inquiry-based learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science 19:14 (2013), 2093–2111 https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-019-14-2093.
56. Molenaar, I., Chiu, M.M., Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: Statistical discourse analysis of primary school children's collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning 9:2 (2014), 137–160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8.
57. Mønster, D., Håkonsson, D.D., Eskildsen, J.K., Wallot, S., Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology & Behavior 156 (2016), 24–34 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004.
58. Morris, A.L., Cleary, A.M., Still, M.L., The role of autonomic arousal in feelings of familiarity. Consciousness and Cognition 17:4 (2008), 1378–1385 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.04.005.
59. Näykki, P., Järvelä S., Kirschner, P.A., Järvenoja, H., Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—a process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research 68 (2014), 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001.
60. Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä S., Kirschner, P., Monitoring makes a difference: Quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61:1 (2017), 31–46 https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066440.
61. Nelson, T.O., Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist 51:2 (1996), 102–116 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102.
62. Palumbo, R.V., Marraccini, M.E., Weyandt, L.L., Wilder-Smith, O., McGee, H.A., Liu, S., et al. Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review 21:2 (2017), 99–141 https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316628405.
63. Panadero, E., Järvelä S., Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist 20:3 (2015), 190–203 https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226.
64. Panadero, E., Klug, J., Järvelä S., Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: When measurement and intervention come hand in hand. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60:6 (2016), 723–735 https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066436.
65. Pecchinenda, A., Smith, C.A., The affective significance of skin conductance activity during a difficult problem-solving task. Cognition & Emotion 10:5 (1996), 481–504 https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380123.
66. Pekrun, R., The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review 18:4 (2006), 315–341 http://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
67. Pintrich, P.R., A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review 16:4 (2004), 385–407 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.
68. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, T., McKeachie, W.J., Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnare (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53:3 (1993), 801–813 https://doi.org/0803973233.
69. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science 29:6 (2005), 1045–1060 http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29.
70. Rogat, T.K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction 29:4 (2011), 375–415 https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930.
71. Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.D., The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 128 (1995), 69–97 http://doi.org/10.1145/130893.952914.
72. Russell, J.A., A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:6 (1980), 1161–1178 http://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714.
73. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. Sawyer, R.K., (eds.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed., 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, 397–417.
74. Slovák, P., Tennent, P., Reeves, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Exploring skin conductance synchronisation in everyday interactions. Proceedings of the 8th nordic conference on human-computer interaction fun, fast, foundational - NordiCHI ’14, 2014, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 511–520 https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639206.
75. Sobocinski, M., Malmberg, J., Järvelä S., Exploring temporal sequences of regulatory phases and associated interactions in low- and high-challenge collaborative learning sessions. Metacognition and Learning 12:2 (2017), 275–294 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9167-5.
76. Tobias, S., Everson, H.T., Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. Schraw, G., Impara, J.C., (eds.) Issues in the measurement of metacognition, 2000, Buros Institute, Lincoln, NE, 147–222.
77. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R.M., Leitten, C.L., Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:2 (1993), 248–260.
78. Veenman, M.V.J., Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning 6:2 (2011), 205–211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x.
79. Veenman, M.V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., Afflerbach, P., Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning 1:1 (2006), 3–14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
80. Volet, S., Vauras, M., Salo, A.-E., Khosa, D., Individual contributions in student-led collaborative learning: Insights from two analytical approaches to explain the quality of group outcome. Learning and Individual Differences 53 (2017), 79–92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.006.
81. Wallot, S., Roepstorff, A., Mønster, D., Multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis (MdRQA) for the analysis of multidimensional time-series: A software implementation in MATLAB and its application to group-level data in joint action. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016), 1–13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01835.
82. Webb, N.M., Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research 13:1 (1989), 21–39 https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1.
83. Winne, P.H., A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H., (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 2011, Routledge, New York, 15–32.
84. Winne, P.H., Hadwin, A.F., Studying as self-regulated learning. Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C., (eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice, 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, 277–304.
85. Winne, P.H., Hadwin, P.H., Perry, N.E., The international handbook of collaborative learning. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Chinn, C.A., Chan, C.K.K., O'Donnell, A.M., Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Chinn, C.A., O'Donnell, A.M., (eds.) The international handbook of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, New York 462–479.
86. Winne, P.H., Jamieson-Noel, D., Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27:4 (2002), 551–572 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00006-1.
87. Wolters, C.A., Benzon, M.B., Assessing and predicting college students’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education 81:2 (2013), 199–221 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901.
88. Zimmerman, B.J., A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81:3 (1989), 329–339 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.
89. Zimmerman, B.J., Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M., (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation, 2000, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US, 13–39, 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7.
90. Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H., Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. 2011, Routledge, New York.
91. Zusho, A., Karabenick, S.A., Bonney, C.R., Sims, B.C., Contextual determinants of motivation and help seeking in the college classroom. Perry, R.P., Smart, J.C., (eds.) The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher Education: An evidence-based perspective, 2007, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 611–659 https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_14.