DeepSig: Deep learning improves signal peptide detection in proteins

Bioinformatics

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2018, Pages 1690-1696

  Savojardo, Castrense ^a   Martelli, Pier Luigi ^a   Fariselli, Piero ^b   Casadio, Rita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

BACTERIUM; EUKARYOTE; INTERNET; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

BACTERIA; DEEP LEARNING; EUKARYOTA; INTERNET; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85047096837     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx818     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abadi, M. et al. (2015) Tensorflow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems. Software available online: https://www. tensorflow. org.
2. Alipanahi, B. et al. (2015) Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RN-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 831-838.
3. Bach, S. et al. (2015) On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decision by layer-wise relevance propagation. PLoS One, 10, e0130140.
4. Bagos, P. G. et al. (2010) Combined prediction of Tat and Sec signal peptides with hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 26, 2811-2817.
5. Berks, B. C. (2015) The twin-arginine protein translocation pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 84, 843-864.
6. Chollet, F. et al. (2015) Keras. Software available online: https://keras. io.
7. Fariselli, P. et al. (2009) Grammatical-restrained hidden conditional random fields for bioinformatics applications. Algorithms Mol. Biol., 4, 13.
8. Indio, V. et al. (2013) The prediction of organelle targeting peptides in eukaryotic proteins with Grammatical Restrained Hidden Conditional Random Fields. Bioinformatics, 29, 981-988.
9. Käll, L. et al. (2004) A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol., 338, 1027-1036.
10. Käll, L. et al. (2005) An HMM posterior decoder for sequence feature prediction that includes homology information. Bioinformatics, 21, i251-i257.
11. Krizhevsky, A. et al. (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Pereira, F. (ed. ), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097-1105.
12. LeCun, Y. et al. (2015) Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436-444.
13. Martoglio, B. and Dobberstein, B. (1998) Signal sequences: more than just greasy peptides. Trends Cell Biol., 8, 410-415.
14. Montavon, G. et al. (2017) Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep Taylor decomposition. Pattern Recogn., 65, 211-222.
15. Nugent, T. and Jones, D. T. (2009) Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 159.
16. Petersen, T. N. et al. (2011) SignalP 4. 0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods, 8, 785-786.
17. Reynolds, S. M. et al. (2008) Transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction using dynamic Bayesian networks. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000213.
18. Savojardo, C. et al. (2013) BETAWARE: a machine-learning tool to detect and predict transmembrane beta-barrel proteins in Prokaryotes. Bioinformatics, 29, 504-505.
19. Savojardo, C. et al. (2017) ISPRED4: interaction site PREDiction in protein structures with a refining grammar model. Bioinformatics, 33, 1656-1663.
20. Simonyan, K. et al. (2013) Deep inside convolutional networks: visualizing image classification models and saliency maps. Comput. Res. Repository, 1312. 6034.
21. Szegedy, C. et al. (2013) Intriguing properties of neural networks. Comput. Res. Repository, 1312. 6199.
22. Tsirigos, K. D. et al. (2015) The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, W401-W407.
23. Viklund, H. et al. (2008) SPOCTOPUS: a combined predictor of signal peptides and membrane protein topology. Bioinformatics, 24, 2928-2929.
24. von Heijne, G. (1990) The signal peptide. J. Membr. Biol., 115, 195-201.
25. Zhou, J. and Troyanskaya, O. G. (2015) Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nature Methods, 12, 931-934.