The prediction of organelle-targeting peptides in eukaryotic proteins with Grammatical-Restrained Hidden Conditional Random Fields

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 981-988

  Indio, Valentina ^a   Martelli, Pier Luigi ^a,b   Savojardo, Castrense ^a   Fariselli, Piero ^a   Casadio, Rita ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b Department of Biology ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EUKARYOTA;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; CHLOROPLAST PROTEIN; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; PEPTIDE; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EUKARYOTE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MITOCHONDRION; PLASTID; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CHLOROPLAST PROTEINS; EUKARYOTA; HUMANS; MITOCHONDRIA; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; PEPTIDES; PLASTIDS; POSITION-SPECIFIC SCORING MATRICES; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84876263504     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt089     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baldi, P. et al. (2000) Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classifica- tion: an overview. Bioinformatics, 16, 412-424.
2. Bannai, H. et al. (2002) Extensive feature detection of N-terminal protein sorting signals. Bioinformatics, 18, 298-305.
3. Bruce, B.D. (2001) The paradox of plastid transit peptides: conservation of function despite divergence in primary structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1541, 2-21.
4. Carrie, C. et al. (2009) Protein transport in organelles: dual targeting ofproteins to mitochondria and chloroplasts. FEBS J., 276, 1187-1195.
5. Claros, M.G. and Vincens, P. (1996) Computational method to predict mitochond- rially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. Eur. J. Biochem., 241, 779-786.
6. Emanuelsson, O. et al. (1999) ChloroP, a neural network-based method for predict- ing chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites. Protein Sci., 8, 978-984.
7. Emanuelsson, O. et al. (2000) Predicting subcellular localization ofproteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol., 300, 1005-1016.
8. Emanuelsson, O. et al. (2007) Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP, and related tools. Nat. Protoc., 2, 953-971.
9. Fariselli, P. et al. (2005) A new decoding algorithm for hidden Markov models improves the prediction of the topology of all-beta membrane proteins. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, S12.
10. Fariselli, P. et al. (2009) Grammatical-restrained hidden conditional random fields for bioinformatics applications. Algorithms Mol. Biol., 4, 13.
11. Ferro, M. et al. (2010) AT-CHLORO, a comprehensive chloroplast proteome data- base with subplastidial localization and curated information on envelope pro- teins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 9, 1063-1084.
12. Fisher, R.A. (1921) On the 'probable error' of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1, 3-32.
13. Jarvis, P. and Robinson, C. (2004) Mechanisms of protein import and routing in chloroplasts. Curr. Biol., 14, R1064-R1077.
14. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R.F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105-132.
15. Lafferty, J. et al. (2001) Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segment- ing and labeling sequence data. Proc. ICML01, 282-289.
16. Habib, SJ. et al. (2007) Analysis and prediction ofmitochondrial targeting signals. Methods Cell Biol., 80, 761-781.
17. Patron, N.J. and Waller, RF. (2007) Transit peptide diversity and divergence: a global analysis of plastid targeting signals. BioEssays, 29, 1048-1058.
18. Petsalaki, E.I. et al. (2006) PredSL: a tool for the N-terminal sequence-based pre- diction of subcellular localization. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 4, 48-55.
19. Pfanner, N. and Geissler, A. (2001) Versatility of the mitochondrial protein import machinery. Nat. Rev. Mol. CellBiol., 2, 339-349.
20. Rice, P. et al. (2000) EMBOSS: European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet., 16, 276-277.
21. Savojardo, C. et al. (2011) Improving the prediction ofdisulfide bonds in eukaryotes with machine learning methods and protein subcellular localization. Bioinformatics, 27, 2224-2230.
22. Schein, A.I. et al. (2001) Chloroplast transit peptide prediction: a peek inside the black box. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, e82.
23. Schneider, T.D. and Stephens, R.M. (1990) Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 6097-6100.
24. Sickmann, A. et al. (2003) The proteome ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 13207-13212.
25. Small, I. et al. (2004) Predotar: a tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics, 4, 1581-1590.
26. Smith, A.C. et al. (2012) MitoMiner: a datawarehouse formitochondrialproteomics data. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 1060-1067.
27. Staiger, C. et al. (2009) Diversity in degrees of freedom of mitochondrial transit peptides. Mol. Biol. Evol., 26, 1773-1780.
28. Texeira, P.F. and Glaser, E. (2012) Processing peptidases in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1833, 360-370.
29. van Wijk, K.J. (2004) Plastid proteomics. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 42, 963-977.