Feel the movement: Real motion influences responses to Take-over requests in highly automated vehicles

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2018-April, Issue , 2018, Pages

  Borojeni, Shadan Sadeghian ^a   Boll, Susanne C J ^b   Heuten, Wilko ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^c   Chuang, Lewis ^c  

^a OFFIS INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Motion cueing; Motion simulator; Take over requests

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; CURVES (ROAD); HUMAN ENGINEERING;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVING SIMULATOR; MOTION SIMULATOR; MOTION-CUEING; REAL MOTION; TAKE-OVER REQUESTS; USER STUDY;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85046944603     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173820     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others. 2013. Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, DC (2013).
2. Ignacio Alvarez and Laura Rumbel. 2017. Skyline: A Platform Towards Scalable UX-Centric In-Vehicle HMI Development. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 9, 3(2017), 34-53.
3. Carryl L Baldwin, Jesse L Eisert, Andre Garcia, Bridget Lewis, Stephanie M Pratt, and Christian Gonzalez. 2012. Multimodal urgency coding: auditory, visual, and tactile parameters and their impact on perceived urgency. Work 41, Supplement 1(2012), 3586-3591. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0669-3586
4. Jack MH Beusmans. 1998. Optic flow and the metric of the visual ground plane. Vision research 38, 8(1998), 1153-1170. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989 (97) 00285-X
5. Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Lewis Chuang, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. Assisting Drivers with Ambient Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 237-244. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005409
6. Karel A Brookhuis, Gerbrand de Vries, and Dick De Waard. 1991. The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 23, 4(1991), 309-316. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/0001-4575 (91) 90008-S
7. James C Byers. 1989. Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: are paired comparisons necessary? Advances in Industrial Erfonomics and Safety l: Taylor and Francis. (1989).
8. Oliver Carsten, Frank CH Lai, Yvonne Barnard, A. Hamish Jamson, and Natasha Merat. 2012. Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? Human factors 54, 5(2012), 747-761. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812460246
9. Viola Cavallo and Michel Laurent. 1988. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception 17, 5(1988), 623-632. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p170623
10. D. Cleij, J. Venrooij, P. Pretto, M. Katliar, H. H. BÃlthoff, D. Steffen, F. W. Hoffmeyer, and H.-P. SchÃuner. 2017a. Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing algorithms for driving simulation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour (2017). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.005
11. Diane Cleij, Joost Venrooij, Paolo Pretto, Daan M. Pool, Max Mulder, and Heinrich H. Bulthoff. 2017b. Continuous Subjective Rating of Perceived Motion Incongruence During Driving Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (9 2017). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2717884
12. Andrew RA Conway, Michael J Kane, Michael F Bunting, D. Zach Hambrick, Oliver Wilhelm, and Randall W Engle. 2005. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and userâAZs guide. Psychonomic bulletin & review 12, 5(2005), 769-786. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772
13. Elizabeth Crundall, David R. Large, and Gary Burnett. 2016. A driving simulator study to explore the effects of text size on the visual demand of in-vehicle displays. Displays 43, Supplement C (2016), 23-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2016.05.003
14. Daniel Damböck, Thomas Weißgerber, Martin Kienle, and Klaus Bengler. 2012. Evaluation of a contact analog head-up display for highly automated driving. In 4th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. San Francisco. USA.
15. Judy Edworthy, Sarah Loxley, and Ian Dennis. 1991. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human factors 33, 2(1991), 205-231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872089103300206
16. Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors 37, 1(1995), 32-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
17. Mica R. Endsley. 2017. Autonomous Driving Systems. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making (2017), 155534341769519. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555343417695197
18. Anna Feldhütter, Christian Gold, Sonja Schneider, and Klaus Bengler. 2017. How the duration of automated driving influences take-over performance and gaze behavior. In Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes. Springer, 309-318. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53305-5-22
19. Christian Gold, Daniel Dambock, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. âA?Take over!âAI How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57. SAGE Publications, 1938-1942. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433
20. Jeff Greenberg, Bruce Artz, and Larry Cathey. 2003. The effect of lateral motion cues during simulated driving. Proceedings of DSC North America (2003), 8-10.
21. Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology 52(1988), 139-183. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/S0166-4115 (08) 62386-9
22. Sebastian Hergeth. 2016. Automation Trust in Conditional Automated Driving Systems: Approaches to Operationalization and Design. (2016).
23. Sungjae Hwang and Jung hee Ryu. 2010. The Haptic steering Wheel: Vibro-tactile based navigation for the driving environment. In 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops). 660-665. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2010. 5470517
24. Andras Kemeny and Francesco Panerai. 2003. Evaluating perception in driving next term simulation experiments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 1(2003), 31-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613 (02) 00011-6
25. Jeamin Koo, Jungsuk Kwac, Wendy Ju, Martin Steinert, Larry Leifer, and Clifford Nass. 2015. Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 9, 4(2015), 269-275. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2
26. H. W. Leibowitz, R. B. Post, Th Brandt, and J. Dichgans. 1982. Implications of recent developments in dynamic spatial orientation and visual resolution for vehicle guidance. In Tutorials on motion perception. Springer, 231-260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3569-6-8
27. Bridget A Lewis and Carryl L Baldwin. 2012. Equating perceived urgency across auditory, visual, and tactile signals. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 56. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1307-1311. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561379
28. Andreas Löcken, Hendrik Buhl, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2015. TactiCar: Towards Supporting Drivers During Lane Change Using Vibro-tactile Patterns. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 32-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809758
29. Dawn C Marshall, John D Lee, and R. Albert Austria. 2007. Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human factors 49, 1(2007), 145-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872007779598145
30. Robert C. Mclane and Walter W. Wierwille. 1975. The Influence of Motion and Audio Cues on Driver Performance in an Automobile Simulator. Human Factors 17, 5(1975), 488-501. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872087501700508
31. Natasha Merat and John D Lee. 2012. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54, 5(2012), 681-686. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812461374
32. Markus Miksch, Martin Steiner, Michael Miksch, and Alexander Meschtscherjakov. 2016. Motion Sickness Prevention System (MSPS): Reading Between the Lines. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147-152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3004323.3004340
33. Frederik Naujoks, Christoph Mai, and Alexandra Neukum. 2014. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation Part I (2014), 431.
34. Michael A. Nees and Bruce N. Walker. 2011. Auditory Displays for In-Vehicle Technologies. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 7, 1(2011), 58-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557234X11410396
35. Alessandro Nesti, Suzanne Nooij, Martin Losert, Heinrich H BÃlthoff, and Paolo Pretto. 2016. Roll rate perceptual thresholds in active and passive curve driving simulation. SIMULATION 92, 5(2016), 417-426. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037549716637135
36. Alexander Ng and Stephen A. Brewster. 2016. Investigating Pressure Input and Haptic Feedback for In-Car Touchscreens and Touch Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive'UI 16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005420
37. Sebastiaan M Petermeijer, Stephan Cieler, and Joost C. F. De Winter. 2017. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat. Accident Analysis & Prevention 99(2017), 218-227. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap. 2016.12.001
38. Sebastiaan M Petermeijer, Joost CF De Winter, and Klaus J Bengler. 2016. Vibrotactile displays: A survey with a view on highly automated driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 4(2016), 897-907. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2494873
39. Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 91-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735
40. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, and Frank Pollick. 2015. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. (2015). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799262
41. Ioannis Politis, Stephen A Brewster, and Frank Pollick. 2014. Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4067-4076. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556988
42. Jonas Radlmayr, Christian Gold, Lutz Lorenz, Mehdi Farid, and Klaus Bengler. 2014. How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 58. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2063-2067. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581434
43. Brian S Repa, Philip M Leucht, and Walter W Wierwille. 1982. The effect of simulator motion on driver performance. Technical Report. SAE Technical Paper. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872087501700508
44. I. Siegler, Gilles Reymond, Andras Kemeny, and Alain Berthoz. 2001. Sensorimotor integration in a driving simulator: contributions of motion cueing in elementary driving tasks. In Proceedings of Driving Simulation Conference. 21-32.
45. A. R. Valente Pais, Mark Wentink, Marinus Maria van Paassen, and Max Mulder. 2009. Comparison of three motion cueing algorithms for curve driving in an urban environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18, 3(2009), 200-221. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.3.200
46. Remo van der Heiden, Shamsi T Iqbal, and Christian P Janssen. 2017. Priming Drivers before Handover in Semi-Autonomous Cars. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 392-404. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025507
47. J. Venrooij, P. Pretto, M. Katliar, S. A. E. Nooij, A. Nesti, M. Lächele, K. N. de Winkel, D. Cleij, and H. H. Bülthoff. 2015. Perception-based motion cueing: validation in driving simulation. In DSC 2015 Europe: Driving simulation conference & exhibition. 153-161.
48. Titus von der Malsburg. 2015. Py-Span-Task - A Software for Testing Working Memory Span. (June 2015).
49. Christopher D Wickens. 2002. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 3, 2(2002), 159-177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
50. Walter W. Wierwille, John G. Casali, and Brian S. Repa. 1983. Driver Steering Reaction Time to Abrupt-Onset Crosswinds, as Measured In a Moving-Base Driving Simulator. Human Factors 25, 1(1983), 103-116. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872088302500110
51. Eberhard Zeeb. 2010. Daimler's new full-scale, high-dynamic driving simulator-a technical overview. Actes INRETS (2010), 157-165.