Study on student performance estimation, student progress analysis, and student potential prediction based on data mining

Computers and Education

Volumn 123, Issue , 2018, Pages 97-108

  Yang, Fan ^a   Li, Frederick W B ^b  

^a Department of Aerospace Science and Technology   (China)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Applications in subject areas; Evaluation methodologies; Intelligent tutoring systems; Simulations; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DATA MINING; NEURAL NETWORKS; TEACHING;

APPLICATIONS IN SUBJECT AREAS; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; SIMULATIONS; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85046628549     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alkhasawneh, R., Hobson, R., ‘Modeling student retention in science and engineering disciplines using neural networks. Proc. IEEE global eng. Edu. Conf, 2011, 660–663.
2. Alzoubi, H., Pan, W.D., Fast and accurate global motion estimation algorithm using pixel subsampling. Information Science 178 (2008), 3415–3425.
3. Baker, R., Corbett, A., Gowda, S., Wagner, A., MacLaren, B., Kauffman, L., et al. v26.pdf">Contextual slip and prediction of student performance after use of an intelligent tutor. UMAP, 2010, 52–63.
4. Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., Goncalves, D., Early predication of student profile based on performance and gaming preferences. IEEE Transaction on Learning Technologies 9:3 (2016), 272–284.
5. Betebenner, D., Norm- and criterion-referenced student growth. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 28:4 (2009), 42–51.
6. Bezdek, J.C., Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective functional algorithms. 1981, Plenum Press, New York.
7. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D., Taxonomy of educational Objectives: Handbook I: The cognitive domain. 1956, David McKay & Co., Inc.
8. Chen, C.M., Lee, H.M., Chen, Y.H., Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory. Computers & Education 44:3 (April 2005), 237–255.
9. Chen, S.W., Lin, S.C., Chang, K.E., Attributed concept Maps: Fuzzy integration and fuzzy matching. IEEE Transaction on Systems 31:5 (2001), 842–852.
10. Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U., Predoctomg student performance from LMS data: A comparison of 17 blended courses using moodle LMS. IEEE transactions on Learning Technologies 10:1 (2017), 17–29.
11. Felder, R.M., Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engr. Education 78:7 (1988), 674–681.
12. Feng, M., Heffernan, N.T., Heffernan, C., Mani, M., Using mixed-effects modeling to analyze different grain-sized skill models in an intelligent tutoring system. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2:2 (2009), 79–92 (April-June).
13. Gokhale, A.A., Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 1995.
14. Gresham, F.M., Cook, C.R., Collins, T., Dart, E., Rasetshwane, K., Truelson, E., et al. Developing a change-sensitive brief behavior rating scale as a progress monitoring tool for social behavior an example using the Social Skills Rating System. School Psychology Review 39:3 (2010), 364–379.
15. Guarin, C.E.L., Guzman, E.L., Gonzales, F.A., A model to predict low academic performance at a specific enrollment using data mining. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Technologias del Aprendizaje 10:3 (2015), 119–126.
16. Guzman, E., Conejo, R., Perez-de-la-Cruz, J.-L., Improving student performance using self-assessment tests’. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Systems 22:4 (2007), 46–52.
17. Hanushek, E.A., Raymond, M.E., Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24:2 (2005), 297–327.
18. Kay, S.M., Fundamentals of statistical signal Processing: Estimation theory, Vol. I, 1993, Prentice-Hall.
19. Kirk, R., Experimental Design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed., 1995 Pacific Grove.
20. Li, Q., Lau, R., Shih, T., Li, F., Technology supports for distributed and collaborative learning over the internet. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 8(4), Feb. 2008 Article No. 5.
21. Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M., Vaste, G., Adaptive learning with the LS-plan system. IEEE Transaction on Learning Technologies 2:3 (Jan. 2009), 203–215.
22. Mitrovic, A., Investigating students' self-assessment skills. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2109/2001 (2001), 247–250.
23. Oscarson, M., Apelgren, B.M., Mapping language teachers' conceptions of student assessment procedures in relation to grading: A two-stage empirical inquiry. Journal of System 39:1 (2011), 2–16.
24. Pets, Y., A simulation study on the performance of the simple difference and covariance-adjusted scores in randomized experimental designs. Journal of Educational Measurement 48:1 (2011), 31–43.
25. Shehri, H.A., Qarni, A.A., Saati, L.A., Batoaq, A., Badukhen, H., Alrashed, S., et al. Student performance prediction using support vector machine and K-Nearest neighbor. 30th international conference on electrical and computer engineering, 2017, pp.1–4.
26. Stecker, P.M., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student Achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools 42:8 (2005), 795–819.
27. Stecker, P.M., Lembke, E.S., Foegen, A., Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure 52:2 (2008), 48–58.
28. Wieling, M.B., Hofman, W.H.A., The Impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Compertes & Education 54:4 (May 2010), 992–998.
29. Yang, F., Li, F., Lau, R., Fuzzy cognitive map based student progress indicator. Advances in Web-based Learning –ICWL2011, 2011, 174–187.
30. Yang, F., Li, F., Lau, R., An open model for learning path construction. Proceedings of international conference on web-based learning, Dec. 2010.
31. Yang, Y.F., Tsai, C.C., Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction 20 (2010), 72–83.
32. Zhang, Y., Guo, D.-S., Li, Z., Common nature of learning between back-propagation and hopfield-type neural networks for generalized matrix inversion with simplified models. IEEE Transaction on Neural Network and Learning System 24:4 (2013), 579–592.