Putting the joy in driving: Investigating the use of a joystick as an alternative to traditional controls within future autonomous vehicles

AutomotiveUI 2017 - 9th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 31-39

  Large, David R ^a   Banks, Victoria ^a   Burnett, Gary ^a   Margaritis, Neofytos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autonomous Vehicles; Driver Controls; Joystick

Indexed keywords

MANUAL CONTROL; STEERING; USER INTERFACES; VEHICLES; WHEELS;

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; FOOT PEDALS; JOYSTICK; MANUAL DRIVING; STEERING WHEEL; TRANSFER OF CONTROLS; VEHICLE FOLLOWING;

AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT;

EID: 85032485033     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3122986.3122996     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Andonian, B., Rauch, W. & Bhise, V., 2003. Driver steering performance using joystick vs. steering wheel controls, Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
2. Banks, V. A. & Stanton, N. A., 2017. Analysis of driver roles: Modelling the changing role of the driver in automated driving systems using EAST. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Volume (in press).
3. Casner, S. M., Hutchins, E. L. & Norman, D., 2016. The challenge of partially automated driving. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), pp. 70-77.
4. Cummings, M. & Ryan, J., 2014. Shared authority concerns in automated driving applications, Massachusetts: Humans and Automation Laboratory Working Paper.
5. Department for Transport, 2015. The pathway to driverless cars: Summary report and action plan, London: DfT Publications.
6. Diels, C. & Bos, J. E., 2015. Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 53, pp. 374-382.
7. Forbes, 2014. Self-driving cars can be relaxing, as the Rinspeed XchangE concept shows. [Online] Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthew depaula/2014/02/28/rinspeed-xchange-concept-has-inte rior-designed-for-autonomous-driving/#25f99b0f7a3b [Accessed 2017 May 15].
8. Haas, E. & Kunze, M., 2001. The effect of a vehicle control device on driver performance in a simulated tank driving task. Iowa, Iowa University, pp. 143-146.
9. Hars, A., 2010. Autonomous cars: The next revolution looms. Nuremberg, Inventivio.
10. Hart, S. & Staveland, L., 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, Volume 52, pp. 139-183.
11. Hoc, J. M., Young, M. S. & Blosseville, J. M., 2009. Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10(2), pp. 135-160.
12. Hollnagel, E., 2003. Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Hollnagel, E., Nabo, A. & Lau, I., 2004. A systemic model for driver-in control. Park City, Utah, USA, University of Iowa, pp. 86-91.
14. Jameson, A., 2003. Adaptive Interfaces and Agents. In: Human-Computer Interface Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 305-330.
15. Jamson, A., Merat, N., Carsten, O. & Lai, F., 2013. Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highlyautomated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Volume 30, pp. 116-125.
16. Kaber, D. B. & Endsley, M. R., 2004. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(2), pp. 113-153.
17. Kelber, C. et al., 2004. Active Steering Unit with integrated ACC for X-by-Wire vehicles using a joystick as HMI. Parma, Italy, IEEE, pp. 173-177.
18. Large, D.R. et al., 2017. A Longitudinal Simulator Study to Explore Drivers' Behaviour During Highly- Automated Driving. Los Angeles, CA, AHFE Conference, pp. 583-594.
19. Lavie, T. & Meyer, J., 2010. Benefits and costs of adaptive user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 68, pp. 508-524.
20. Lee, J., 2000. A summary of issues concerning joystick control of ground vehicles, Iowa City: Booz-Allen & Hamilton Inc..
21. McKnight, A. J. & Adams, B. B., 1970. Driver Education Task Analysis. Volume II: Task Analysis Methods, Washington, DC: NHTSA.
22. Mercedes, 2015. The long haul truck of the future. [Online] Available at: https://www.mercedesbenz. com/en/mercedes-benz/innovation/the-long-haultruck- of-the-future/ [Accessed 15 May 2017].
23. Office of Defects Investigation, 2017. Investigation PE 16-007, Washington, DC: NHTSA.
24. Parasuraman, R., 2000. Designing automation for human use: Empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics, 43(7), pp. 931-951.
25. Patten, C. J. et al., 2006. Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(5), pp. 887-894.
26. Peters, B. & Östlund, J., 2005. Joystick controlled driving for drivers with disabilities, Linköping, Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI).
27. Saab, 2009. The Saab 9000 drive-by-wire 'Joystick' project. [Online] Available at: https://www.saabs united.com/2009/11/the-saab-9000-drive-by-wire-joyst ick-project.html [Accessed 05 May 2017].
28. SAE International, 2016. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On- Road Motor Vehicles, Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
29. Schaefer, K. & Straub, E., 2016. Will passengers trust driverless vehicles? removing the steering wheel and pedals. San Diego, USA, IEEE, pp. 159-165.
30. Seriouswheels, 2003. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F 200 Imagination Concept. [Online] Available at: http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/top-1996-Mercede s-Benz-F-200-Imagination-Concept.htm [Accessed 05 May 2017].
31. Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A. & Salmon, P. M., 2015. Human Factors in Automotive Engineering and Technology. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
32. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A. & Schrauf, M., 2015. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 78, pp. 212-221.