Situation awareness in automated vehicles through proximal peripheral light signals

AutomotiveUI 2017 - 9th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 287-292

  Van Veen, Tom ^a   Karjanto, Juffrizal ^a   Terken, Jacques ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automated vehicles; Light; Peripheral interaction; Proximal; Situation awareness

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; LIGHT; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED VEHICLES; CAR DRIVER; HUMAN DRIVERS; LIGHT SIGNAL; PERIPHERAL INTERACTIONS; PROXIMAL; SITUATION AWARENESS; TRAFFIC SITUATIONS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85032497184     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3122986.3122993     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Automated Driving: Levels of driving automation are defined in new SAE international standard J3016: 2014. https://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated-driving.pdf. Accessed: 2017-04-17.
2. Bakker, S. 2013. Design for Peripheral Interaction. Eindhoven University of Technology.
3. Baltodano, S., Sibi, S., Martelaro, N., Gowda, N. and Ju, W. 2015. The RRADS platform. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15 (2015), 281-288.
4. Beattie, D., Baillie, L., Halvey, M. and Mccall, R. 2014. What's around the corner? Enhancing Driver Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles via In-Vehicle Spatial Auditory Displays. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI '14. (2014), 189-198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2641206.
5. Costanza, E., Inverso, S.A., Pavlov, E., Allen, R. and Maes, P. 2006. eye-q: Eyeglass Peripheral Display for Subtle Intimate Notifications. Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services - MobileHCI '06 (New York, New York, USA, 2006), 211.
6. Endsley, M.R. 1995. Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 37, 1 (1995), 65-84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049499.
7. Endsley, M.R. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 37, 1 (1995), 32-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543.
8. Gugerty, L. 2011. Situation awareness in driving. Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology. (2011), 265-272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394.
9. Hyman, I.E. 2016. Unaware Observers: The Impact of Inattentional Blindness on Walkers, Drivers, and Eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 5, 3 (2016), 264-269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.06.011.
10. Kaempf, G.I., Wolf, S. and Miller, T.E. 1993. Decision making in the AEGIS combat information center. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2, (1993), 1107-1111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129303701615.
11. Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and effort. Prentice- Hall.
12. Loecken, A., Heuten, W. and Boll, S. 2015. Supporting Lane Change Decisions with Ambient Light. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15 (2015), 204-211.
13. Mack, A. and Rock, I. 1998. Inattentional blindness. MIT Press/Bradford Books series in cognitive psychology. (1998), Inattentional blindness. xiv, 273. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2010.03.011.
14. Martelaro, N., Sirkin, D. and Ju, W. 2015. DAZE: A Real-Time Situation Awareness Measurement Tool for Driving. Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15 (New York, New York, USA, 2015), 158-163.
15. Miller, D., Sun, A. and Ju, W. 2014. Situation awareness with different levels of automation. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. (2014), 688-693. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2014.6973989.
16. Poppinga, B., Henze, N., Fortmann, J., Heuten, W. and Boll, S. 2012. AmbiGlasses-Information in the Periphery of the Visual Field. Proceedings of Mensch & Computer. (2012).
17. Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles: 2013. https://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Autom ated-Vehicles-Policy.pdf. Accessed: 2017-04-17.
18. Schoettle, B. and Sivak, M. 2014. Public Opinion About Self-Driving Vehicles in China, India, Japan, The U.S., The U.K. and Australia.
19. The Mercedes-Benz F 015 Luxury in Motion: https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedesbenz/ innovation/research-vehicle-f-015-luxury-inmotion/. Accessed: 2017-01-09.
20. Trösterer, S., Wuchse, M., Döttlinger, C., Meschtscherjakov, A. and Tscheligi, M. 2015. Light my way. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15 (New York, New York, USA, 2015), 196-203.
21. Tseng, H.-Y., Liang, R.-H., Liwei, C. and Chen, B.-Y. 2015. LEaD: Utilizing Light Movement as Peripheral Visual Guidance for Scooter Navigation. MobileHCI '15- Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. (2015), 323-326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785831.
22. Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J.G. 2000. Engineering psychology and human performance. Prentice-Hall.