Versatile Cas9-driven subpopulation selection toolbox for Lactococcus lactis

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2018, Pages

  van der Els, Simon ^a,b,c   James, Jennelle K ^b   Kleerebezem, Michiel ^a,c   Bron, Peter A ^b,c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NIZO FOOD RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c BE Basic   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CRISPR Cas9; Genetic engineering; Lactococcus lactis

Indexed keywords

DNA; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

CONSTITUTIVE PROMOTERS; CRISPR-CAS9; DOUBLE STRAND BREAKS; EXPRESSION VECTORS; GENETIC ELEMENTS; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIUM; LACTIS STRAIN; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS;

BACTERIA;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CHROMOSOME; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; SUBPOPULATION;

EUKARYOTA; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; POSIBACTERIA; PROKARYOTA;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BACTERIAL RNA; GUIDE RNA;

CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; LACTOBACILLALES; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; METABOLISM; PLASMID; STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CRISPR-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 9; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLALES; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; PLASMIDS; RNA, BACTERIAL; RNA, GUIDE; STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES;

EID: 85044871986     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02752-17     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Machielsen R, Siezen RJ, van Hijum SA, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2011. Molecular description and industrial potential of Tn6098 conjugative transfer conferring alpha-galactoside metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:555-563. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02283-10
2. van Kranenburg R, Marugg JD, Van Swam II, Willem NJ, de Vos WM. 1997. Molecular characterization of the plasmid-encoded eps gene cluster essential for exopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis. Mol Microbiol 24:387-397. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3521720.x
3. Rauch PJ, De Vos WM. 1992. Characterization of the novel nisin-sucrose conjugative transposon Tn5276 and its insertion in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol 174:1280-1287. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.174.4.1280-1287.1992
4. Coffey A, Ross RP. 2002. Bacteriophage-resistance systems in dairy starter strains: molecular analysis to application. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82:303-321. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020639717181
5. Kok J, van Gijtenbeek LA, de Jong A, van der Meulen SB, Solopova A, Kuipers OP. 2017. The evolution of gene regulation research in Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:S220-S243. https://doi.org/10.1093/ femsre/fux028
6. Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A. 1987. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol 169:5429-5433. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987
7. Mojica FJ, Diez-Villasenor C, Soria E, Juez G. 2000. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of Archaea, Bacteria and mitochondria. Mol Microbiol 36:244-246. https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x
8. Jansen R, Embden JD, Gaastra W, Schouls LM. 2002. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol 43:1565-1575. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x
9. Pourcel C, Salvignol G, Vergnaud G. 2005. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology 151: 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27437-0
10. Mojica FJ, Diez-Villasenor C, Garcia-Martinez J, Soria E. 2005. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol 60:174-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3
11. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD. 2005. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology 151:2551-2561. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.28048-0
12. Brouns SJ, Jore MM, Lundgren M, Westra ER, Slijkhuis RJ, Snijders AP, Dickman MJ, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, van der Oost J. 2008. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 321:960-964. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159689
13. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P. 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315:1709-1712. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1138140
14. Garneau JE, Dupuis ME, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadan AH, Moineau S. 2010. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09523
15. Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, Gonzales K, Chao Y, Pirzada ZA, Eckert MR, Vogel J, Charpentier E. 2011. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471:602-607. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09886
16. Deveau H, Barrangou R, Garneau JE, Labonte J, Fremaux C, Boyaval P, Romero DA, Horvath P, Moineau S. 2008. Phage response to CRISPRvan encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 190: 1390-1400. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01412-07
17. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
18. Wang H, La Russa M, Qi LS. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annu Rev Biochem 85:227-264. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-biochem-060815-014607
19. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819-823. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1231143
20. Davis AJ, Chen DJ. 2013. DNA double strand break repair via nonhomologous end-joining. Transl Cancer Res 2:130-143
21. Jinek M, East A, Cheng A, Lin S, Ma E, Doudna J. 2013. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. Elife 2:e00471. https://doi.org/10.7554/ eLife.00471
22. Cui L, Bikard D. 2016. Consequences of Cas9 cleavage in the chromosome of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 44:4243-4251. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw223
23. Dy RL, Pitman AR, Fineran PC. 2013. Chromosomal targeting by CRISPRCas systems can contribute to genome plasticity in bacteria. Mob Genet Elements 3:e26831. https://doi.org/10.4161/mge.26831
24. Millen AM, Horvath P, Boyaval P, Romero DA. 2012. Mobile CRISPR/Casmediated bacteriophage resistance in Lactococcus lactis. PLoS One 7:e51663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051663
25. Lemay ML, Tremblay DM, Moineau S. 2017. Genome engineering of virulent lactococcal phages using CRISPR-Cas9. ACS Synth Biol 6:1351-1358
26. van Pijkeren JP, Britton RA. 2014. Precision genome engineering in lactic acid bacteria. Microb Cell Fact 13(Suppl 1):S10. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1475-2859-13-S1-S10
27. Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP. 2014. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e131. https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gku623
28. Song X, Huang H, Xiong Z, Ai L, Yang S. 2017. CRISPR-Cas9D10A nickaseassisted genome editing in Lactobacillus casei. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01259-17
29. Selle K, Klaenhammer TR, Barrangou R. 2015. CRISPR-based screening of genomic island excision events in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:8076-8081. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508525112
30. Martel B, Moineau S. 2014. CRISPR-Cas: an efficient tool for genome engineering of virulent bacteriophages. Nucleic Acids Res 42: 9504-9513. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku628
31. Jang YJ, Seo SO, Kim SA, Li L, Kim TJ, Kim SC, Jin YS, Han NS. 2017. Elimination of the cryptic plasmid in Leuconostoc citreum by CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Biotechnol 251:151-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.04.018
32. Simon D, Chopin A. 1988. Construction of a vector plasmid family and its use for molecular cloning in Streptococcus lactis. Biochimie 70:559-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9084(88)90093-4
33. Platteeuw C, Simons G, de Vos WM. 1994. Use of the Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase (gusA) gene as a reporter gene for analyzing promoters in lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:587-593
34. Mierau I, Kleerebezem M. 2005. 10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:705-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0107-6
35. Kuipers OP, de Ruyter PGGA, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM. 1998. Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J Biotechnol 64:15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00100-X
36. Vos P, van Asseldonk M, van Jeveren F, Siezen R, Simons G, de Vos WM. 1989. A maturation protein is essential for production of active forms of Lactococcus lactis SK11 serine proteinase located in or secreted from the cell envelope. J Bacteriol 171:2795-2802. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.5.2795-2802.1989
37. Chopin A, Bolotin A, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD, Chopin M. 2001. Analysis of six prophages in Lactococcus lactis IL1403: different genetic structure of temperate and virulent phage populations. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 644-651. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.3.644
38. Delavat F, Miyazaki R, Carraro N, Pradervand N, van der Meer JR. 2017. The hidden life of integrative and conjugative elements. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:512-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux008
39. Nanda AM, Thormann K, Frunzke J. 2015. Impact of spontaneous prophage induction on the fitness of bacterial populations and hostmicrobe interactions. J Bacteriol 197:410-419. https://doi.org/10.1128/ JB.02230-14
40. Fontaine L, Boutry C, de Frahan MH, Delplace B, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Boyaval P, Hols P. 2010. A novel pheromone quorum-sensing system controls the development of natural competence in Streptococcus thermophilus and Streptococcus salivarius. J Bacteriol 192:1444-1454. https:// doi.org/10.1128/JB.01251-09
41. Dubnau D. 1991. Genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Rev 55:395-424
42. Sapranauskas R, Gasiunas G, Fremaux C, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. 2011. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 39:9275-9282. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr606
43. Wu X, Kriz AJ, Sharp PA. 2014. Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Quant Biol 2:59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-014-0030-x
44. Wells JM, Wilson PW, Le Page RW. 1993. Improved cloning vectors and transformation procedure for Lactococcus lactis. J Appl Bacteriol 74: 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb05195.x
45. Horton RM, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Hunt HD, Cai Z, Pease LR. 1993. Gene splicing by overlap extension. Methods Enzymol 217:270-279. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(93)17067-F
46. Doench JG, Fusi N, Sullender M, Hegde M, Vaimberg EW, Donovan KF, Smith I, Tothova Z, Wilen C, Orchard R, Virgin HW, Listgarten J, Root DE. 2016. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize offtarget effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 34:184-191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3437
47. Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, Li Y, Fine EJ, Wu X, Shalem O, Cradick TJ, Marraffini LA, Bao G, Zhang F. 2013. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31:827-832. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2647
48. Exterkate FA. 1984. Location of peptidases outside and inside the membrane of Streptococcus cremoris. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:177-183
49. Gasson MJ. 1983. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J Bacteriol 154:1-9
50. Siezen RJ, Bayjanov J, Renckens B, Wels M, van Hijum SA, Molenaar D, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2010. Complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis KF147, a plant-associated lactic acid bacterium J Bacteriol 192:2649-2650
51. Bolotin A, Wincker P, Mauger S, Jaillon O, Malarme K, Weissenbach J, Ehrlich SD, Sorokin A. 2001. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403 Genome Res 11:731-753