Erratum: CRISPRCas9D10A nickase-assisted genome editing in Lactobacillus casei [Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 83, 22, (2017), (e01259-17)] DOI:10.1128/AEM.01259-17;CRISPR-Cas9D10A nickase-assisted genome editing in Lactobacillus casei

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 83, Issue 22, 2017, Pages

  Song, Xin ^a   Huang, He ^b   Xiong, Zhiqiang ^a   Ai, Lianzhong ^a   Yang, Sheng ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHANGHAI FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY   (China)

^c Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials   (China)

^d Shanghai Research and Development Center of Industrial Biotechnology   (China)

Author keywords

CRISPR; Gene editing; Lactobacillus casei; Nickase

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; LACTIC ACID; PROTEINS;

CRISPR; ENHANCED GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; EXPRESSION CASSETTE; GENETIC MANIPULATIONS; LACTIC ACID BACTERIA; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; NICKASE; SINGLE-GENE KNOCKOUT;

GENE EXPRESSION;

BACTERIUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOME; MUTATION; PLASMID; PROTEIN;

LACTOBACILLUS CASEI;

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I;

BACTERIAL CHROMOSOME; BACTERIAL GENOME; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; EVALUATION STUDY; GENE EDITING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE VECTOR; GENETICS; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; METABOLISM; PLASMID; PROCEDURES;

CHROMOSOMES, BACTERIAL; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; GENE EDITING; GENETIC VECTORS; GENOME, BACTERIAL; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; PLASMIDS;

EID: 85032683575     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00146-18     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Struszczak L. 2016. Effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota ingestion on common cold infection and herpes virus antibodies in endurance athletes: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1555-1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3415-x
2. Aktas B, De Wolfe TJ, Safdar N, Darien BJ, Steele JL. 2016. The impact of Lactobacillus casei on the composition of the cecal microbiota and innate immune system is strain specific. PLoS One 11:e0156374. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156374
3. Kato-Kataoka A, Nishida K, Takada M, Kawai M, Kikuchi-Hayakawa H, Suda K, Ishikawa H, Gondo Y, Shimizu K, Matsuki T, Kushiro A, Hoshi R, Watanabe O, Igarashi T, Miyazaki K, Kuwano Y, Rokutan K. 2016. Fermented milk containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota preserves the diversity of the gut microbiota and relieves abdominal dysfunction in healthy medical students exposed to academic stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3649-3658. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04134-15
4. Vinay-Lara EWS, Bai L, Phrommao E, Broadbent JR, Steele JL. 2016. Lactobacillus casei as a biocatalyst for biofuel production. Microbiol Biotechnol 43:1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-016-1797-8
5. Sybesma W, Burgess C, Starrenburg M, van Sinderen D, Hugenholtz J. 2004. Multivitamin production in Lactococcus lactis using metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 6:109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2003.11.002
6. Bron PA, Kleerebezem M. 2011. Engineering lactic acid bacteria for increased industrial functionality. Bioeng Bugs 2:80-87. https://doi.org/ 10.4161/bbug.2.2.13910
7. Lucena BT, dos Santos BM, Moreira JL, Moreira AP, Nunes AC, Azevedo V, Miyoshi A, Thompson FL, de Morais MA, Jr. 2010. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria of the bioethanol process. BMC Microbiol 10:298. https:// doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-298
8. Bidart GN, Rodriguez-Diaz J, Monedero V, Yebra MJ. 2014. A unique gene cluster for the utilization of the mucosal and human milk-associated glycans galacto-N-biose and lacto-N-biose in Lactobacillus casei. Mol Microbiol 93:521-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12678
9. Munoz-Provencio D, Rodriguez-Diaz J, Collado MC, Langella P, Bermudez-Humaran LG, Monedero V. 2012. Functional analysis of the Lactobacillus casei BL23 sortases. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8684-8693. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02287-12
10. Yang P, Wang J, Qi Q. 2015. Prophage recombinases-mediated genome engineering in Lactobacillus plantarum. Microb Cell Fact 14:154. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0344-z
11. van Pijkeren JP, Britton RA. 2012. High efficiency recombineering in lactic acid bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 40:e76. https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gks147
12. van Pijkeren JP, Britton RA. 2014. Precision genome engineering in lactic acid bacteria. Microb Cell Fact 13(Suppl 1):S10. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1475-2859-13-S1-S10
13. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
14. Jiang WY, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31:233-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2508
15. Horvath P, Barrangou R. 2010. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327:167-170. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1179555
16. Cobb RE, Wang YJ, Zhao HM. 2015. High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR/Cas system. ACS Synth Biol 4:723-728. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500351f
17. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin SL, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu XB, Jiang WY, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819-823. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1231143
18. DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. 2013. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 41:4336-4343. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt135
19. Huang H, Zheng G, Jiang W, Hu H, Lu Y. 2015. One-step high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Streptomyces. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 47:231-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmv007
20. Jiang Y, Chen B, Duan C, Sun B, Yang J, Yang S. 2015. Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:2506-2514. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04023-14
21. Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5103-5114. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01248-15
22. Wang Y, Zhang ZT, Seo SO, Choi KJ, Lu T, Jin YS, Blaschek HP. 2015. Markerless chromosomal gene deletion in Clostridium beijerinckii using CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Biotechnol 200:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.02.005
23. Xu T, Li Y, Shi Z, Hemme CL, Li Y, Zhu Y, Van Nostrand JD, He Z, Zhou J. 2015. Efficient genome editing in Clostridium cellulolyticum via CRISPRCas9 nickase. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:4423-4431. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00873-15
24. Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP. 2014. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e131. https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gku623
25. Yasuda E, Serata M, Sako T. 2008. Suppressive effect on activation of macrophages by Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota genes determining the synthesis of cell wall-associated polysaccharides. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4746-4755. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00412-08
26. Chen C, Ai L, Zhou F, Wang L, Zhang H, Chen W, Guo B. 2011. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus casei LC2W. J Bacteriol 193:3419-3420. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05017-11
27. Song L, Cui HY, Tang LJ, Qiao XY, Liu M, Jiang YP, Cui W, Li YJ. 2014. Construction of upp deletion mutant strains of Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis based on counterselective system using temperaturesensitive plasmid. J Microbiol Methods 102:37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.04.011
28. Ruas-Madiedo P, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG. 2005. Invited review: methods for the screening, isolation, and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. J Dairy Sci 88:843-856. https://doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72750-8
29. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin CY, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, Trevino AE, Scott DA, Inoue A, Matoba S, Zhang Y, Zhang F. 2013. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154:1380-1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021
30. Dianov GL, Hubscher U. 2013. Mammalian base excision repair: the forgotten archangel. Nucleic Acids Res 41:3483-3490. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt076
31. Davis L, Maizels N. 2014. Homology-directed repair of DNA nicks via pathways distinct from canonical double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E924-E932. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400236111
32. Leenhouts K, Buist G, Bolhuis A, ten Berge A, Kiel J, Mierau I, Dabrowska M, Venema G, Kok J. 1996. A general system for generating unlabelled gene replacements in bacterial chromosomes. Mol Gen Genet 253: 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380050315
33. Fang F, O'Toole PW. 2009. Genetic tools for investigating the biology of commensal lactobacilli. Front Biosci 14:3111-3127. https://doi.org/10.2741/3439
34. Russell WM, Klaenhammer TR. 2001. Efficient system for directed integration into the Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus gasseri chro-mosomes via homologous recombination. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 4361-4364. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.9.4361-4364.2001
35. Biswas I, Gruss A, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E. 1993. High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol 175:3628-3635. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.11.3628-3635.1993
36. Serror P, Ilami G, Chouayekh H, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E. 2003. Transposition in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus: identification of two thermosensitive replicons and two functional insertion sequences. Microbiology 149:1503-1511. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.25827-0
37. Chen Z, Lin J, Ma C, Zhao S, She Q, Liang Y. 2014. Characterization of pMC11, a plasmid with dual origins of replication isolated from Lactobacillus casei MCJ and construction of shuttle vectors with each replicon. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:5977-5989. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00253-014-5649-z
38. Kimmel SA, Roberts RF. 1998. Development of a growth medium suitable for exopolysaccharide production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus RR. Int J Food Microbiol 40:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0168-1605(98)00023-3
39. DeLoache WC, Russ ZN, Narcross L, Gonzales AM, Martin VJ, Dueber JE. 2015. An enzyme-coupled biosensor enables (S)-reticuline production in yeast from glucose. Nat Chem Biol 11:465-471. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nchembio.1816
40. Mustafi N, Grunberger A, Kohlheyer D, Bott M, Frunzke J. 2012. The development and application of a single-cell biosensor for the detection of l-methionine and branched-chain amino acids. Metab Eng 14:449-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.02.002
41. Lokman BC, Heerikhuisen M, Leer RJ, van den Broek A, Borsboom Y, Chaillou S, Postma PW, Pouwels PH. 1997. Regulation of expression of the Lactobacillus pentosus xylAB operon. J Bacteriol 179:5391-5397. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.179.17.5391-5397.1997
42. Law J, Buist G, Haandrikman A, Kok J, Venema G, Leenhouts K. 1995. A system to generate chromosomal mutations in Lactococcus lactis which allows fast analysis of targeted genes. J Bacteriol 177:7011-7018. https:// doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.24.7011-7018.1995
43. Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S. 1996. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173:33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(95)00685-0