Development of high throughput, high precision synthesis platforms and characterization methodologies for toxicological studies of nanocellulose

Cellulose

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 2303-2319

  Pyrgiotakis, Georgios ^a   Luu, Wing ^b   Zhang, Zhenyuan ^a   Vaze, Nachiket ^a   DeLoid, Glen ^a   Rubio, Laura ^a   Graham, W Adam C ^d   Bell, David C ^c,d   Bousfield, Douglas ^b   Demokritou, Philip ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b The University of Maine   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acid hydrolysis; Cellulose nanomaterials; Nanocellulose; Nanotoxicology; Toxicology; Ultra fine friction grinder

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS; CHARACTERIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FRICTION; HYDROLYSIS; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ACID HYDROLYSIS; CELLULOSE NANO-CRYSTALS; NANOTOXICOLOGY; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATORS; TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; TOXICOLOGY; ULTRA-FINES;

CELLULOSE;

CELLULOSE; FRICTION; HYDROLYSIS; MATERIALS; PLATFORMS; SYNTHESIS; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 85044764555     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-1718-2     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohyd Polym 87:963–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078
2. Alwis KU, Milton DK (2006) Recombinant factor C assay for measuring endotoxin in house dust: comparison with LAL, and (1 → 3)-β-d-glucans. Am J Ind Med 49:296–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20264
3. Aulin C, Johansson E, Wågberg L, Lindström T (2010) Self-organized films from cellulose I nanofibrils using the layer-by-layer technique. Biomacromol 11:872–882. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100075e
4. Beltran-Huarac J, Zhang Z, Pyrgiotakis G et al (2018) Development of reference metal and metal oxide engineered nanomaterials for nanotoxicology research using high throughput and precision flame spray synthesis approaches. NanoImpact 10:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.11.007
5. Camarero-Espinosa S, Endes C, Mueller S et al (2016) Elucidating the potential biological impact of cellulose nanocrystals. Fibers 4:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib4030021
6. Catalán J, Ilves M, Järventaus H et al (2015) Genotoxic and immunotoxic effects of cellulose nanocrystals in vitro. Environ Mol Mutagen 56:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21913
7. Chen L, Wang Q, Hirth K et al (2015) Tailoring the yield and characteristics of wood cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) using concentrated acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 22:1753–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0615-1
8. 2 nanoparticles on gut microbiota composition and colitis induction in mice. NanoImpact 8:80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.07.005
9. Clift MJD, Foster EJ, Vanhecke D et al (2011) Investigating the interaction of cellulose nanofibers derived from cotton with a sophisticated 3D human lung cell coculture. Biomacromol 12:3666–3673. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200865j
10. Cohen J, Deloid G, Pyrgiotakis G, Demokritou P (2012) Interactions of engineered nanomaterials in physiological media and implications for in vitrodosimetry. Nanotoxicology 7:417–431. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2012.666576
11. Cohen JM, Derk R, Wang L et al (2014) Tracking translocation of industrially relevant engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) across alveolar epithelial monolayers in vitro. Nanotoxicology 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.879612
12. Cohen JM, Beltran-Huarac J, Pyrgiotakis G, Demokritou P (2018) Effective delivery of sonication energy to fast settling and agglomerating nanomaterial suspensions for cellular studies: implications for stability, particle kinetics, dosimetry and toxicity. NanoImpact 10:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.12.002
13. De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2017) Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem Mater 29:4609–4631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531
14. Deloid GM, Cohen JM, Pyrgiotakis G et al (2015) Advanced computational modeling for in vitro nanomaterial dosimetry. Part Fibre Toxicol 12:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0109-1
15. Deloid GM, Cohen JM, Pyrgiotakis G, Demokritou P (2017a) Preparation, characterization, and in vitro dosimetry of dispersed, engineered nanomaterials. Nat Protoc 12:355–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.172
16. Deloid GM, Wang Y, Kapronezai K et al (2017b) An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol 14:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0221-5
17. Ding JL, Ho B (2010) Endotoxin detection–from limulus amebocyte lysate to recombinant factor C. Subcell Biochem 53:187–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9078-2_9
18. Dufresne A (2012) Nanocellulose: potential reinforcement in composites. Nat Polym Nanocompos 2:1–32
19. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M et al (2009) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0
20. Endes C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Mueller S et al (2016) A critical review of the current knowledge regarding the biological impact of nanocellulose. J Nanobiotechnol 14:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0230-9
21. Farcas MT, Kisin ER, Menas AL et al (2016) Pulmonary exposure to cellulose nanocrystals caused deleterious effects to reproductive system in male mice. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 79:984–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2016.1211045
22. Frost RL, Keeffe EC (2009) Raman spectroscopic study of the sulfite-bearing minerals scotlandite, hannebachite and orschallite: implications for the desulfation of soils. J Raman Spectrosc 40:244–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2089
23. George J, Sabapathi SN (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S64386
24. Gorbet MB, Sefton MV (2005) Endotoxin: the uninvited guest. Biomaterials 26:6811–6817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.063
25. Guo Z, Martucci NJ, Moreno-Olivas F et al (2017) Titanium dioxide nanoparticle ingestion alters nutrient absorption in an in vitro model of the small intestine. NanoImpact 5:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.01.002
26. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339w
27. Hanif Z, Ahmed FR, Shin SW et al (2014) Size- and dose-dependent toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) on human fibroblasts and colon adenocarcinoma. Colloids Surf B 119:162–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.04.018
28. Hannukainen KS, Suhonen S, Savolainen K, Norppa H (2012) Genotoxicity of nanofibrillated cellulose in vitro as measured by enzyme comet assay. Toxicol Lett 211:S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.276
29. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038
30. Herner JD, Green PG, Kleeman MJ (2006) Measuring the trace elemental composition of size-resolved airborne particles. Environ Sci Technol 40:1925–1933. https://doi.org/10.1021/es052315q
31. International Food Information Council (IFIC), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2004) Food additives and ingredients—overview of food ingredients, Additives & Colors. In: fda.gov. https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/FoodAdditivesIngredients/ucm094211.htm. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
32. Khan A, Huq T, Khan RA et al (2014) Nanocellulose-based composites and bioactive agents for food packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.578765
33. Lam E, Hrapovic S, Majid E et al (2012a) Catalysis using gold nanoparticles decorated on nanocrystalline cellulose. Nanoscale 4:997–1002. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR11558A
34. Lam E, Male KB, Chong JH et al (2012b) Applications of functionalized and nanoparticle-modified nanocrystalline cellulose. Trends Biotechnol 30:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.001
35. Lavoine N, Bras J, Desloges I (2014) Mechanical and barrier properties of cardboard and 3D packaging coated with microfibrillated cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40106
36. Li Y, Boraschi D (2016) Endotoxin contamination: a key element in the interpretation of nanosafety studies. Nanomedicine 11:269–287. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.15.196
37. Liu F, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Chiou B-S et al (2017) Controlled-release of tea polyphenol from gelatin films incorporated with different ratios of free/nanoencapsulated tea polyphenols into fatty food simulants. Food Hydrocolloids 62:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.08.004
38. Ludueña L, Fasce D, Alvarez VA, Stefani PM (2011) Nanocellulose from rice husk following alkaline treatment to remove silica. BioResources 6:1440–1453. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.6.2.1440-1453
39. McClements DJ, Deloid G, Pyrgiotakis G et al (2016) The role of the food matrix and gastrointestinal tract in the assessment of biological properties of ingested engineered nanomaterials (iENMs): state of the science and knowledge gaps. NanoImpact 3–4:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2016.10.002
40. Miller FA, Wilkins CH (1952) Infrared spectra and characteristic frequencies of inorganic ions. Biomacromol 24:1253–1294
41. Missoum K, Belgacem M, Bras J (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: a review. Materials 6:1745–1766. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6051745
42. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B
43. Morais JPS, de de Souza Filho M, de Souza Filho MSM et al (2013) Extraction and characterization of nanocellulose structures from raw cotton linter. Carbohyd Polym 91:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.010
44. Morris DD, Crowe N, Moore JN, Moldawer LL (1992) Endotoxin-induced production of interleukin 6 by equine peritoneal macrophages in vitro. Am J Vet Res 53:1298–1301
45. Nair SS, Zhu JY, Deng Y, Ragauskas AJ (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanofibrillation by micro grinding. J Nanopart Res 16:3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2349-7
46. Nakamoto K (2008) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds. Wiley, Hoboken
47. Nallanthighal S, Chan C, Bharali DJ et al (2017) Particle coatings but not silver ions mediate genotoxicity of ingested silver nanoparticles in a mouse model. NanoImpact 5:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.01.003
48. Nyström G, Mihranyan A, Razaq A et al (2010) A nanocellulose polypyrrole composite based on microfibrillated cellulose from wood. J Phys Chem B 114:4178–4182. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911272m
49. O’Connor B, Berry R, Goguen R (2014) Commercialization of cellulose nanocrystal (NCC™) production. In: Bowman D, Hull M (eds) Nanotechnology environmental health and safety, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Waltham, pp 225–246
50. Okahisa Y, Yoshida A, Miyaguchi S, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent wood–cellulose nanocomposite as a base substrate for flexible organic light-emitting diode displays. Compos Sci Technol 69:1958–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.017
51. Ong KJ, Shatkin JA, Nelson K et al (2017) Establishing the safety of novel bio-based cellulose nanomaterials for commercialization. NanoImpact 6:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.03.002
52. Padberg J, Bauer W, Gliese T (2016) The influence of fibrillation on the oxygen barrier properties of films from microfibrillated cellulose. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31(4):548–560. https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2016-31-04-p548-560
53. Pal AK, Dhimiter B, Cohen J, Demokritou P (2015) Implications of in vitrodosimetry on toxicological ranking of low aspect ratio engineered nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 9:871–885. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.986670
54. Paunonen S (2013) Strength and barrier enhancements of cellophane and cellulose derivative films: a review. BioResources 8:3098–3121
55. Posteck MT, Moon RJ, Bilodeau M, Rudie AW (2013) Production and applications of cellulose nanomaterials. TAPPI Press, Peachtree Corners
56. Pyrz WD, Buttrey DJ (2008) Particle size determination using TEM: a discussion of image acquisition and analysis for the novice microscopist. Langmuir 24:11350–11360. https://doi.org/10.1021/la801367j
57. Robertson G, Olson J, Allen P et al (1999) Measurement of fiber length, coarseness, and shape with the fiber quality analyzer. Tappi J 82(10):93–98
58. Roman M (2015) Toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: a review. Ind Biotechnol 11:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2014.0024
59. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0497769
60. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL et al (2006a) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 7:1687–1691. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060154s
61. Saito T, Okita Y, Nge TT et al (2006b) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose: microscopic analysis of fibrous fractions in the oxidized products. Carbohyd Polym 65:435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.034
62. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8:2485–2491
63. Salas C, Nypelö T, Rodriguez-Abreu C et al (2014) Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 19:383–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.003
64. Schoepf JJ, Bi Y, Kidd J et al (2017) Detection and dissolution of needle-like hydroxyapatite nanomaterials in infant formula. NanoImpact 5:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2016.12.007
65. Shatkin JA, Kim B (2015) Cellulose nanomaterials: life cycle risk assessment, and environmental health and safety roadmap. Environ Sci Nano 2:477–499. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EN00059A
66. Shi Z, Phillips GO, Yang G (2013) Nanocellulose electroconductive composites. Nanoscale 5:3194–3201. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00408b
67. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Yanamala N et al (2016) Gender differences in murine pulmonary responses elicited by cellulose nanocrystals. Part Fibre Toxicol 13:3941. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0140-x
68. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym2040728
69. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y
70. Tajvidi M, Gardner DJ, Bousfield DW (2016) Cellulose nanomaterials as binders: laminate and particulate systems. J Renew Mater 4:365–376. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2016.634103
71. Taniguchi T, Okamura K (1998) New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int 47:291–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199811)47:3<291:AID-PI11>3.0.CO;2-1
72. Torcello-Gómez A, Foster TJ (2016) Influence of interfacial and bulk properties of cellulose ethers on lipolysis of oil-in-water emulsions. Carbohyd Polym 144:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.005
73. Usov I, Nyström G, Adamcik J et al (2015) Understanding nanocellulose chirality and structure–properties relationship at the single fibril level. Nat Commun 6:7564. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8564
74. Vartiainen J, Pöhler T, Sirola K et al (2011) Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18:775–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9501-7
75. Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Reiner RS et al (2012) Approaching zero cellulose loss in cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) production: recovery and characterization of cellulosic solid residues (CSR) and CNC. Cellulose 19:2033–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9765-6
76. Wei H, Rodriguez K, Renneckar S (2014) Environmental science and engineering applications of nanocellulose-based nanocomposites. Environ Sci Nano 1(4):302–316
77. World Health Organization (2012) Test for sterility. In: The international pharmacopoeia, pp 245–254
78. Yanamala N, Farcas MT, Hatfield MK et al (2014) In vivo evaluation of the pulmonary toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: a renewable and sustainable nanomaterial of the future. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1691–1698. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500153k
79. Yao M, McClements DJ, Zhao F et al (2017) Controlling the gastrointestinal fate of nutraceutical and pharmaceutical-enriched lipid nanoparticles: from mixed micelles to chylomicrons. NanoImpact 5:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2016.12.001
80. Zhao Y, Simonsen J, Cavender G et al (2016) Nano-cellulose edible coatings and uses thereof. Google Patents