Nursing's Boundary Work: Theory Development and the Making of Nursing Science, ca. 1950-1980

Nursing Research

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 63-73

  Tobbell, Dominique A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

20th century nursing history; doctoral education; nursing science; nursing theory

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FORECASTING; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH (U.S.); NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85044086234     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: 15389847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000251     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Abdellah, F. G., & Levine, E. (1965). Better patient care through nursing research (2nd ed. ). New York, NY: Macmillan Company.
2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). The researchfocused doctoral program in nursing. Pathways to excellence. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Baer, E. (1991, February 23). The feminist disdain for nursing. New York Times, 25.
4. Berthold, J. S. (1968). Symposium on theory development in nursing. Nursing Research, 17, 196-197.
5. Brown, M. I. (1964). Research in the development of nursing theory: The importance of a theoretical framework in nursing research. Nursing Research, 13, 109-112.
6. Carnegie, M. E. (1974). The minority practitioner in nursing. NLN Publications, 15-1513, 39-42.
7. Cleland, V. (1967). The use of existing theories. Nursing Research, 16, 118-121.
8. Cleland, V. (1971). Sex discrimination: Nursing's most pervasive problem. American Journal of Nursing, 71, 1542-1547.
9. Committee on Educational Policy, Southern Section. (1960). Development of a doctoral program in nursing. (Collection 401, Box 11, Folder: Nursing School 1960-1964), UCLA University Archives, Los Angeles, CA.
10. Conant, L. H. (1967). A search for resolution of existing problems in nursing. Nursing Research, 16, 114-117.
11. Conley, Y. P., Heitkemper, M., McCarthy, D., Anderson, C. M., Corwin, E. J., Daack-Hirsch, S., Voss, J. (2015). Educating future nursing scientists: Recommendations for integrating omics content in PhD programs. Nursing Outlook, 63, 417-427. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2015. 06. 006
12. Connolly, C., & Lynaugh, J. (1997). Fifty years at the Division of Nursing United States Public Health Service. Washington, DC: USPHS Division of Nursing.
13. D'Antonio, P. (2010). American nursing: A history of knowledge, authority, and the meaning of work. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Davis, L. (1974). Theminority practitioner in nursing. NLN Publications, 15-1513, 43-45.
15. Dickoff, J., & James, P. (1968). A theory of theories: A position paper. Nursing Research, 17, 197-203.
16. Dickoff, J., & James, P. (1986). The authors comment. In L. H. Nicoll (Ed. ), Perspectives on nursing theory (1st ed. ) (pp. 108-112). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
17. Division of Nursing, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1971). Future directions of doctoral education for nurses. Report of a conference. Bethesda, MD:DHEW.
18. Downs, F. S. (1969). Some critical issues in nursing research. Nursing Forum, 8, 393-404.
19. Downs, F. S. (1978). Doctoral education in nursing: Future directions. Nursing Outlook, 26, 56-61.
20. Ellis, R. (1968). Characteristics of significant theories. Nursing Research, 17, 217-222.
21. Ellis, R. (1982). Conceptual issues in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 30, 406-410.
22. Engstrom, J. L. (1984). Problems in the development, use, and testing of nursing theory. Journal of Nursing Education, 23, 245-251.
23. Fagin, C. M. (1976). Letter toMadeleine Leininger, October 28, 1976. (Madeleine Leininger Collection, Accession 725, Box 1), Walter P. Reuther Library, University Archives, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
24. Fairman, J. (2008a). Context and contingency in the history of post World War II nursing scholarship in the United States. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40, 4-11. doi:10. 1111/j. 1547-5069. 2007. 00199. x
25. Fairman, J. (2008b). Making room in the clinic: Nurse practitioners and the evolution of modern health care. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26. Fairman, J., & Lynaugh, J. E. (1998). Critical care nursing: A history. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27. Fairman, J., & Mahon, M. M. (2001). Oral history of Florence Downs: The early years. Nursing Research, 50, 322-328.
28. Fawcett, J. (1980). A framework for analysis and evaluation of conceptual models of nursing. Nurse Educator, 5, 10-14.
29. Flaskerud, J. H., & Halloran, E. J. (1980). Areas of agreement in nursing theory development. Advances in Nursing Science, 3, 1-7.
30. Glass, L. (2010). Leading the way: A history of the University of Minnesota School of Nursing, 1909-2009. Minneapolis, MN: Tasora Books.
31. Grace, H. (1974a). A history of doctoral program planning at the University of Illinois College of Nursing. (College of Nursing, Dean-Faculty Papers-Helen Grace Papers, Acc 017-01-20-01, Box 4, folder: 48), University of Illinois at Chicago Special Collections and University Archives, Chicago, IL.
32. Grace, H. (1974b). The status of research in nursing. (College of Nursing, Dean-Faculty Papers-Helen Grace Papers, Acc 017-01-20-01, Box 28, folder: 307), University of Illinois-Chicago Special Collections and University Archives, Chicago, IL.
33. Grace, H. K., LaBelle, B. M., & Pender, N. J. (1976). Study of resources for doctoral education in the Midwest. (MAIN Collection, Box 30), Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN.
34. Grace, P. J., Willis, D. G., Roy, C. Sr., & Jones, D. A. (2016). Profession at the crossroads: A dialog concerning the preparation of nursing scholars and leaders. Nursing Outlook, 64, 61-70. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2015. 10. 002
35. Grady, P. A. (2015). National Institute of Nursing Research commentary on the Idea Festival for nursing science education. Nursing Outlook, 63, 432-435. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2015. 02. 006
36. Henderson, V. (1964). The nature of nursing. American Journal of Nursing, 64, 62-68. doi:10. 2307/3419278
37. Henly, S. J., McCarthy, D. O., Wyman, J. F., Heitkemper, M. M., Redeker, N. S., Titler, M. G., Dunbar-Jacob, J. (2015). Emerging areasof science: Recommendations for nursing science education from the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Idea Festival. Nursing Outlook, 63, 398-407. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2015. 04. 007
38. Henly, S. J., McCarthy, D. O., Wyman, J. F., Stone, P. W., Redeker, N. S., McCarthy, A. M., Conley, Y. P. (2015). Integrating emerging areas of nursing science into PhD programs. Nursing Outlook, 63, 408-416. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2015. 04. 010
39. Jacox, A. (1974). Theory construction in nursing: An overview. Nursing Research, 4-12.
40. Jamann, J. S. (1985). Proceedings of doctoral programs in nursing: Consensus for quality: Sponsored by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the Division of Nursing, Department of Health and Human Services [Special section]. Journal of Professional Nursing, 1, 90-121.
41. Johnson, D. E. (1959). The nature of a science of nursing. Nursing Outlook, 7, 291-294.
42. Johnson, D. E. (1968). Theory in nursing: Borrowed and unique. Nursing Research, 17, 206-209.
43. Johnson, D. E. (1974). Development of theory: A requisite for nursing as a primary health profession. Nursing Research, 23, 372-377.
44. Keeling, A. W. (2004). Blurring the boundaries between medicine and nursing: Coronary care nursing, circa the 1960s. Nursing History Review, 12, 139-164.
45. Kerr, M. E. (2016). Support for nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 64, 262-270.
46. King, I. M. (1971). Toward a theory for nursing: General concepts of human behavior. Toronto, Canada: Wiley.
47. King, I. M. (1980). Letter to Betty Pearson. (Midwest Nursing Research Society Collection, Series II, Box 43, folder: 298 Theory Development Research Section, 1979-1981), University of Illinois at Chicago University Archives, Chicago, IL.
48. Kline, W. (2010). Bodies of knowledge: Sexuality, reproduction, and women's health in the second wave. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49. Leininger, M. (1968). Conference on the nature of science and nursing. Introductory comments [Special section]. Nursing Research, 17, 484-486.
50. Leininger, M. (1969). Conference on the nature of science in nursing: Introduction: Nature of science in nursing. Nursing Research, 18, 388-389.
51. Leininger, M. (1976a). Doctoral programs for nurses: A survey of trends, issues, and projected developments. In J. Scott, S. Gortner & M. Bourgeois (Eds. ), The doctorally prepared nurse: Report of two conferences on the demand for education of nurses with doctoral degrees (pp. 3-38). Bethesda, MD: DHEW.
52. Leininger, M. (1976b). Doctoral programs for nurses: Trends, questions, and projected plans. Nursing Research, 25, 201-210.
53. Leininger, M. (1977). Creating and maintaining a nursing research support center. Paper presented at the Project for Nursing Research Colloquium at Adelphi University School of Nursing (Madeleine Leininger Collection, Accession 725, Box 8), Walter P. Reuther Library, University Archives, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
54. Leininger, M. (1982). Letter to Doris Bloch, Chief, Research Support Section, Division of Nursing, U. S. Public Health Service. (Madeleine Leininger Collection, Accession 725, Box 1, folder 10), Walter P. Reuther Library, University Archives, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
55. Lynaugh, J. E., & Brush, B. L. (1997). American nursing: From hospitals to health systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
56. Malka, S. G. (2007). Daring to care: American nursing and secondwave feminism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
57. Meleis, A. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed. ). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
58. National League for Nursing. (1979). Perspectives for nursing and goals of the National League for Nursing, 1979-1981. New York, NY: Author.
59. Norris, C. M. (Ed. ). (1969). Proceedings of the Nursing Theory Conference (Vols. 1-3, 1969-1970). Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Nursing Education.
60. Pitel, M., & Vian, J. (1975). Data collected for the International Directory of Nurses with Doctoral Degrees. Nursing Research, 24, 340-351.
61. Program Review Committee. (1981). To Health Sciences Policy and Review Council. (School of Nursing Collection, Box 55, folder: H. S. Policy and Review Council, Program Review Committee), University of Minnesota University Archives, Minneapolis, MN. Research-How will nursing define it?. [Special section]. (1967). Nursing Research, 16, 108-129.
62. Ruffin, J. E. (1974). Issues for the Black nurse today: Competence and commitment. NLN Publications, 15, 46-51.
63. Ruzek, S. B. (1978). The women's health movement: Feminist alternatives to medical control. New York, NY: Praeger.
64. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Devices & desires: Gender, technology, and American nursing. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
65. Schlotfeldt, R. M. (1960). Reflections on nursing research. American Journal of Nursing, 60, 492-494.
66. Schlotfeldt, R. M. (1965). Nursing in the university community. (29DD, Box 2, Papers ofDean Rozella Schlotfeldt, folder 1:1), Case Western Reserve University Archives, Cleveland, OH.
67. Schlotfeldt, R. M. (1968). Letter to Florence Wald, Yale University. (29DB Box 5, Nurse Scientist Program, General Info and Recruiting, 1963-1974), Case Western Reserve University Archives, Cleveland, OH.
68. Sime, A. M. (2010). An oral history with A. Marilyn Sime/Interviewer Dominique A. Tobbell. University of Minnesota Academic Health Center Oral History Project, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from http://editions. lib. umn. edu/ahc-ohp/2012/03/ 29/a-marilyn-sime/
69. Simmons, L. W., & Henderson, V. (1964). Nursing research: A survey and assessment. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
70. Smith, G. R. (1976). Multicultural components of nursing. NLNPublications, 14-1625, 1-7.
71. Snyder-Halpern, R. (1986). Doctoral programs in nursing: An examination of curriculum similarities and differences. Journal of Nursing Education, 25, 358-365.
72. SurgeonGeneral's ConsultantGroup onNursing. (1963). Toward quality in nursing: Needs and goals. Report of the Surgeon General's Consultant Group on Nursing. Public Health Service Publication No. 922. Washington, DC: DHEW. Retrieved from http://files. eric. ed. gov/fulltext/ED021994. pdf
73. Thorne, S. (2014). What constitutes core disciplinary knowledge? [Editorial]. Nursing Inquiry, 21, 1-2. doi:10. 1111/nin. 12062
74. Tobbell, D. A. (2014). "Coming to grips with the nursing question": The politics of nursing education reform in 1960s America. Nursing History Review, 22, 37-60. doi:10. 1891/1062-8061. 22. 37
75. Villarruel, A. M., & Fairman, J. A. (2015). The Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science, Idea Festival Advisory Committee: Good ideas that need to go further. Nursing Outlook, 63, 436-438. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2015. 04. 003
76. Wald, F. S., & Leonard, R. C. (1964). Towards development of nursing practice theory. Nursing Research, 13, 309-313.
77. Wiedenbach, E. (1970). Nurses' wisdomin nursing theory. American Journal of Nursing, 70, 1057-1062.
78. Wyman, J. F., & Henly, S. J. (2015). PhD programs in nursing in the United States: Visibility of American Association of Colleges of Nursing core curricular elements and emerging areas of science. Nursing Outlook, 63, 390-397. doi:10. 1016/j. outlook. 2014. 11. 003
79. Yarcheski, A., & Mahon, N. E. (2013). Characteristics of quantitative nursing research from 1990 to 2010. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 45, 405-411. doi:10. 1111/jnu. 12038
80. Zimmerman, M. K. (1987). Thewomen's healthmovement: A critique of medical enterprise and the position of women. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds. ), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 442-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.