PhD programs in nursing in the United States: Visibility of American Association of Colleges of Nursing core curricular elements and emerging areas of science

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 390-397

  Wyman, Jean F ^a   Henly, Susan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Graduate nursing education; Nursing research; Research focused doctorate

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; HUMAN; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING ORGANIZATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; HUMANS; SCHOOLS, NURSING; SOCIETIES, NURSING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942673856     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2010). The research focused doctoral program in nursing. Pathways to excellence. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/phdposition.pdf.
2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2002). Indicators of quality in research-focused doctoral programs in nursing [Position Statement]. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18, 289-294.
3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (1997). Indicators of quality in doctoral programs in nursing [Position Statement]. Journal of Professional Nursing, 13, 200-202.
4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (1987). Indicators of quality in doctoral programs in nursing [Position Statement]. Journal of Professional Nursing, 3, 72-74.
5. Anderson, C. A. (2000). Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: Are we prepared for the future? Journal of Professional Nursing, 16, 191-200.
6. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2014). The state of health equity research: Closing knowledge gaps to address inequities. Retrieved from https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/14-009%20HEALTH%20DISPARITIES_FINAL1.pdf.
7. Beckett, D. M. (2014). PhD preparation of nurse faculty and nurse scientists: Do they have to be the same? [Invited Commentary]. Nursing Research, 63, 156-157.
8. Brunet, A., & Berger, S. L. (2014). Epigenetics of aging and agingrelated disease. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 69, S17-S20.
9. Cani, P. D. (2014). Metabolismin 2013: The gut microbiota manages host metabolism. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 10, 74-76.
10. Carper, B. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 13-23.
11. Carter, M. (2006). The evolution of doctoral education in nursing. In C. Bridges, A. Lowenstein, L. Andrist, P. Nicholas, & K. Wolf (Eds.), History of nursing ideas (pp. 383-391). New York, NY: Jones & Bartlett.
12. Division of Nursing, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1971). Future directions of doctoral education for nurses. Report of a conference. Bethesda, MD: Author.
13. Donaldson, S. K. (2003). Commentary. The science of human healthd Domain structure. Biological Research for Nursing, 4, 165-169.
14. Downs, F. S. (1989). Differences between the professional doctorate and the academic/research doctorate. Journal of Professional Nursing, 5, 261-265.
15. Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (2009). The fourth paradigm. Dataintensive scientific discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.
16. Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
17. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Exploring the biological contributions to human health. Does sex matter? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
18. Jamann, J. S. (1985). Proceedings of doctoral programs in nursing: Consensus for quality. Journal of Professional Nursing, 1, 90-121.
19. Kim, M. J., Park, C. G., Park, S. H., Khan, S., & Ketefian, S. (2014). Quality of nursing doctoral education and scholarly performance in U.S. schools of nursing: Strategic areas for improvement. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30, 10-18.
20. Klijs, B., Nusselder, W. J., Looman, C. W., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2011). Contribution of chronic disease to the burden of disability. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25325.
21. McEwen, M., & Bechtel, G. A. (2000). Characteristics of nursing doctoral programs in the United States. Journal of Professional Nursing, 16, 282-292.
22. Meleis, A. I. (1987). ReVisions in knowledge development: A passion for substance. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 1(1), 5-19.
23. Minnick, A. F., & Halstead, L. A. (2002). A data-based agenda for doctoral nursing education reform. Nursing Outlook, 50, 24-29.
24. Minnick, A. F., Norman, L. D., Donaghey, B., Fisher, L. W., & McKirgan, I. M. (2010). Defining and describing capacity issues in US doctoral nursing research programs. Nursing Outlook, 58, 36-43.
25. National Institute of Nursing Research. (2011). Bringing science to life. NINR strategic plan (NIH Pulication No. 11-7783). Retrieved from https://www.ninr.nih.gov/aboutninr/ninr-mission-andstrategic-plan.
26. Neal, M. L., & Kerckhoffs, R. (2009). Current progress in patientspecific modeling. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 11, 111-126.
27. Office of Research on Women's Health. (2010). Moving into the future with new dimensions and strategies for women's health research: A vision for 2020 for women's health research (NIH Publication No. 10-7606). Retrieved from http://orwh.od.nih.gov/research/strategicplan/ORWH_StrategicPlan2020_Vol1.pdf.
28. Schallom, L., Thimmesch, A. R., & Pierce, J. D. (2011). Systems biology in critical-care nursing. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 30, 1-7.
29. Snyder-Halpern, R. (1986). Doctoral programs in nursing: An examination of curriculum similarities and differences. Journal of Nursing Education, 25, 358-365.
30. Starkweather, A. R., Alhaerri, A. A., Montpetit, A., Brumelle, J., Filler, K., Montpetit, M.,. Jackson-Cook, C. K. (2014). An integrative review of factors associated with telomere length and implictions for biobehavioral research. Nursing Research, 63, 36-50.
31. Stevenson, J. S., & Woods, N. F. (1986). Nursing science and contemporary science: Emerging paradigms. In G. E. Sorenson (Ed.), Setting the agenda for the year 2000: Knowledge development in nursing (pp. 6-20). Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Nursing.
32. Tilg, H., & Moschen, A. R. (2014). Microbiota and diabetes: An evolving relationship. Gut, 63, 1513-1521.
33. Ziemer, M. M., Brown, J., Fitzpatrick, M. L., Manfredi, C., O'Leary, J., & Valiga, T. M. (1992). Doctoral programs in nursing: Philosophy, curricula, and program requirements. Journal of Professional Nursing, 8, 56-62.