FROGS: Find, Rapidly, OTUs with Galaxy Solution

Bioinformatics

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 1287-1294

  Escudié, Frédéric ^a   Auer, Lucas ^b   Bernard, Maria ^c   Mariadassou, Mahendra ^d   Cauquil, Laurent ^e   Vidal, Katia ^e   Maman, Sarah ^e   Hernandez Raquet, Guillermina ^f   Combes, Sylvie ^e   Pascal, Géraldine ^e  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^d INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^f INSA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETICS; METAGENOMICS; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

BACTERIA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; METAGENOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85042863928     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andres, J. and Bertin, P.N. (2016) The microbial genomics of arsenic. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 40, 299-322.
2. Blankenberg, D. et al. (2010) Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., Chapter 19, Unit 19 10 11-21.
3. Bokulich, N.A. et al. (2013) Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods, 10, 57-59.
4. Boyer, F. et al. (2016) obitools: a unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 16, 176-182.
5. Cai, Y. and Sun, Y. (2011) ESPRIT-Tree: hierarchical clustering analysis of millions of 16S rRNA pyrosequences in quasilinear computational time. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, e95.
6. Camacho, C. et al. (2009) BLASTp: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 421.
7. Caporaso, J.G. et al. (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods, 7, 335-336.
8. Comeau, A.M. et al. (2017) Microbiome helper: a custom and streamlined workflow for microbiome research. mSystems, 2, e00127-16.
9. de Vargas, C. et al. (2015) Ocean plankton. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science, 348, 1261605.
10. DeSantis, T.Z. et al. (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 5069-5072.
11. Edgar, R.C. (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics, 26, 2460-2461.
12. Edgar, R.C. et al. (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27, 2194-2200.
13. Edgar, R.C. (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods, 10, 996-998.
14. Eren, A.M. et al. (2015) Minimum entropy decomposition: unsupervised oligotyping for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences. Isme J., 9, 968-979.
15. Fu, L. et al. (2012) CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 28, 3150-3152.
16. Giardine, B. et al. (2005) Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res., 15, 1451-1455.
17. Goecks, J. et al. (2010) Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol., 11, R86.
18. Goodrich, J.K. et al. (2014) Conducting a microbiome study. Cell, 158, 250-262.
19. Goris, J. et al. (2007) DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 57, 81-91.
20. Haas, B.J. et al. (2011) Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res., 21, 494-504.
21. Hess, M. et al. (2011) Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science, 331, 463-467.
22. Hildebrand, F. et al. (2014) LotuS: an efficient and user-friendly OTU processing pipeline. Microbiome, 2, 30.
23. Hooper, L.V. et al. (2012) Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science, 336, 1268-1273.
24. Hugenholtz, P. et al. (1998) Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol., 180, 4765-4774.
25. Huse, S.M. et al. (2010) Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ. Microbiol., 12, 1889-1898.
26. Jeraldo, P. et al. (2014) IM-TORNADO: a tool for comparison of 16S reads from paired-end libraries. PLoS One, 9, e114804.
27. Jovel, J. et al. (2016) Characterization of the Gut microbiome using 16s or shotgun metagenomics. Front. Microbiol., 7, 459.
28. Kim, M. et al. (2014) Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 64, 346-351.
29. Konstantinidis, K.T. et al. (2006) The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 361, 1929-1940.
30. Kopylova, E. et al. (2016) Open-source sequence clustering methods improve the state of the art. mSystems, 1, e00003-15.
31. Kozich, J.J. et al. (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79, 5112-5120.
32. Kunin, V. et al. (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol., 12, 118-123.
33. Magoc, T. and Salzberg, S.L. (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 27, 2957-2963.
34. Mahé, F. et al. (2014) Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies. Peer J., 2, e593.
35. Manter, D.K. et al. (2016) myPhyloDB: a local web server for the storage and analysis of metagenomic data. Database (Oxford), 2016, 1-9.
36. Martin, M. (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J., 17, 10-12.
37. McIlroy, S.J. et al. (2015) MiDAS: the field guide to the microbes of activated sludge. Database (Oxford), 2015, bav062.
38. McMurdie, P.J. and Holmes, S. (2013) phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics ofmicrobiome census data. PLoS One, 8, e61217.
39. Mizrahi-Man, O. et al. (2013) Taxonomic classification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes using short sequencing reads: evaluation of effective study designs. PLoS One, 8, e53608.
40. Nelson, M.C. et al. (2014) Analysis, optimization and verification of Illumina-generated 16S rRNA gene amplicon surveys. PLoS One, 9, e94249.
41. Nguyen, N. et al. (2016) A perspective on 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit clustering using sequence similarity. Npj BiofilmsMicrobiomes, 2, 16004.
42. Oh, J. et al. (2016) CLUSTOM-CLOUD: in-memory data grid-based software for clustering 16S rRNA sequence data in the cloud environment. PLoS One, 11, e0151064.
43. Pinto, A.J. and Raskin, L. (2012) PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets. PLoS One, 7, e43093.
44. Quast, C. et al. (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D590-D596.
45. Rognes, T. et al. (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. Peer J., 4, e2584.
46. Schloss, P.D. et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 7537-7541.
47. Sinclair, L. et al. (2015) Microbial community composition and diversity via 16S rRNA gene amplicons: evaluating the illumina platform. PLoS One, 10, e0116955.
48. Wang, Q. et al. (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73, 5261-5267.