Cryo-EM structure of the exocyst complex

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 139-146

  Mei, Kunrong ^a   Li, Yan ^b,c   Wang, Shaoxiao ^a   Shao, Guangcan ^d   Wang, Jia ^b,c   Ding, Yuehe ^d   Luo, Guangzuo ^a   Yue, Peng ^a   Liu, Jun Jie ^b,e   Wang, Xinquan ^b   Dong, Meng Qiu ^d   Wang, Hong Wei ^b,c   Guo, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Tsinghua University   (China)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

^e LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXOCYST; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; PROTEIN BINDING; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEIN;

AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL LYSATE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EUKARYOTE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FUNGAL MEMBRANE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PLECKSTRIN HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; CELL MEMBRANE; CYTOPLASM; EXOCYTOSIS; GOLGI COMPLEX; IMAGE PROCESSING; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SECRETORY VESICLE; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CELL MEMBRANE; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CYTOPLASM; EXOCYTOSIS; GOLGI APPARATUS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SECRETORY VESICLES; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEINS;

EID: 85042767185     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-017-0016-2     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Pfeffer, S. R. Transport-vesicle targeting: tethers before SNAREs. Nat. Cell. Biol. 1, E17-E22 (1999).
2. Guo, W., Sacher, M., Barrowman, J., Ferro-Novick, S. & Novick, P. Protein complexes in transport vesicle targeting. Trends Cell. Biol. 10, 251-255 (2000).
3. Whyte, J. R. & Munro, S. Vesicle tethering complexes in membrane traffic. J. Cell. Sci. 115, 2627-2637 (2002).
4. Sztul, E. & Lupashin, V. Role of tethering factors in secretory membrane traffic. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 290, C11-C26 (2006).
5. Yu, I. M. & Hughson, F. M. Tethering factors as organizers of intracellular vesicular traffic. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 26, 137-156 (2010).
6. Bröcker, C., Engelbrecht-Vandré, S. & Ungermann, C. Multisubunit tethering complexes and their role in membrane fusion. Curr. Biol. 20, R943-R952 (2010).
7. TerBush, D. R. & Novick, P. Sec6, Sec8, and Sec15 are components of a multisubunit complex which localizes to small bud tips in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell. Biol. 130, 299-312 (1995).
8. TerBush, D. R., Maurice, T., Roth, D. & Novick, P. The Exocyst is a multiprotein complex required for exocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 15, 6483-6494 (1996).
9. He, B. & Guo, W. The exocyst complex in polarized exocytosis. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 21, 537-542 (2009).
10. Wu, B. & Guo, W. The exocyst at a glance. J. Cell. Sci. 128, 2957-2964 (2015).
11. Yue, P. et al. Sec3 promotes the initial binary t-SNARE complex assembly and membrane fusion. Nat. Commun. 8, 14236 (2017).
12. Heider, M. R. & Munson, M. Exorcising the exocyst complex. Traffic 13, 898-907 (2012).
13. Munson, M. & Novick, P. The exocyst defrocked, a framework of rods revealed. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 577-581 (2006).
14. Hsu, S. C., Hazuka, C. D., Foletti, D. L. & Scheller, R. H. Targeting vesicles to specific sites on the plasma membrane: the role of the sec6/8 complex. Trends Cell. Biol. 9, 150-153 (1999).
15. Heider, M. R. et al. Subunit connectivity, assembly determinants and architecture of the yeast exocyst complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 59-66 (2016).
16. Lees, J. A., Yip, C. K., Walz, T. & Hughson, F. M. Molecular organization of the COG vesicle tethering complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1292-1297 (2010).
17. Chou, H. T., Dukovski, D., Chambers, M. G., Reinisch, K. M. & Walz, T. CATCHR, HOPS and CORVET tethering complexes share a similar architecture. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 761-763 (2016).
18. Picco, A. et al. The in vivo architecture of the exocyst provides structural basis for exocytosis. Cell 168, 400-412.e18 (2017).
19. Ding, Y. H. et al. Increasing the depth of mass-spectrometry-based structural analysis of protein complexes through the use of multiple cross-linkers. Anal. Chem. 88, 4461-4469 (2016).
20. Croteau, N. J., Furgason, M. L., Devos, D. & Munson, M. Conservation of helical bundle structure between the exocyst subunits. PLoS. One 4, e4443 (2009).
21. Jackson, L. P., Kümmel, D., Reinisch, K. M. & Owen, D. J. Structures and mechanisms of vesicle coat components and multisubunit tethering complexes. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 24, 475-483 (2012).
22. Sutton, R. B., Fasshauer, D., Jahn, R. & Brunger, A. T. Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 395, 347-353 (1998).
23. Finger, F. P., Hughes, T. E. & Novick, P. Sec3p is a spatial landmark for polarized secretion in budding yeast. Cell 92, 559-571 (1998).
24. Guo, W., Tamanoi, F. & Novick, P. Spatial regulation of the exocyst complex by Rho1 GTPase. Nat. Cell. Biol. 3, 353-360 (2001).
25. Zhang, X. et al. Membrane association and functional regulation of Sec3 by phospholipids and Cdc42. J. Cell. Biol. 180, 145-158 (2008).
26. Yamashita, M. et al. Structural basis for the Rho-and phosphoinositidedependent localization of the exocyst subunit Sec3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 180-186 (2010).
27. Baek, K. et al. Structure-function study of the N-terminal domain of exocyst subunit Sec3. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 10424-10433 (2010).
28. Boyd, C., Hughes, T., Pypaert, M. & Novick, P. Vesicles carry most exocyst subunits to exocytic sites marked by the remaining two subunits, Sec3p and Exo70p. J. Cell. Biol. 167, 889-901 (2004).
29. Luo, G., Zhang, J. & Guo, W. The role of Sec3p in secretory vesicle targeting and exocyst complex assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 25, 3813-3822 (2014).
30. He, B., Xi, F., Zhang, X., Zhang, J. & Guo, W. Exo70 interacts with phospholipids and mediates the targeting of the exocyst to the plasma membrane. EMBO J. 26, 4053-4065 (2007).
31. Liu, J., Zuo, X., Yue, P. & Guo, W. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates the targeting of the exocyst to the plasma membrane for exocytosis in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18, 4483-4492 (2007).
32. Sivaram, M. V., Furgason, M. L., Brewer, D. N. & Munson, M. The structure of the exocyst subunit Sec6p defines a conserved architecture with diverse roles. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 555-556 (2006).
33. Jin, R. et al. Exo84 and Sec5 are competitive regulatory Sec6/8 effectors to the RalA GTPase. EMBO J. 24, 2064-2074 (2005).
34. Fukai, S., Matern, H. T., Jagath, J. R., Scheller, R. H. & Brunger, A. T. Structural basis of the interaction between RalA and Sec5, a subunit of the sec6/8 complex. EMBO J. 22, 3267-3278 (2003).
35. Wu, S., Mehta, S. Q., Pichaud, F., Bellen, H. J. & Quiocho, F. A. Sec15 interacts with Rab11 via a novel domain and affects Rab11 localization in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 879-885 (2005).
36. Dong, G., Hutagalung, A. H., Fu, C., Novick, P. & Reinisch, K. M. The structures of exocyst subunit Exo70p and the Exo84p C-terminal domains reveal a common motif. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 1094-1100 (2005).
37. Hamburger, Z. A., Hamburger, A. E., West, A. P. Jr. & Weis, W. I. Crystal structure of the S. cerevisiae exocyst component Exo70p. J. Mol. Biol. 356, 9-21 (2006).
38. Moore, B. A., Robinson, H. H. & Xu, Z. The crystal structure of mouse Exo70 reveals unique features of the mammalian exocyst. J. Mol. Biol. 371, 410-421 (2007).
39. Zhang, C. et al. Endosidin2 targets conserved exocyst complex subunit EXO70 to inhibit exocytosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E41-E50 (2016).
40. Chen, J. et al. Crystal structure of Sec10, a subunit of the exocyst complex. Sci. Rep. 7, 40909 (2017).
41. Whyte, J. R. & Munro, S. The Sec34/35 Golgi transport complex is related to the exocyst, defining a family of complexes involved in multiple steps of membrane traffic. Dev. Cell. 1, 527-537 (2001).
42. Murray, D. H. et al. An endosomal tether undergoes an entropic collapse to bring vesicles together. Nature 537, 107-111 (2016).
43. Novick, P. & Guo, W. Ras family therapy: Rab, Rho and Ral talk to the exocyst. Trends Cell. Biol. 12, 247-249 (2002).
44. Lipschutz, J. H. & Mostov, K. E. Exocytosis: the many masters of the exocyst. Curr. Biol. 12, R212-R214 (2002).
45. Moskalenko, S. et al. The exocyst is a Ral effector complex. Nat. Cell. Biol. 4, 66-72 (2002).
46. Moskalenko, S. et al. Ral GTPases regulate exocyst assembly through dual subunit interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 51743-51748 (2003).
47. Sugihara, K. et al. The exocyst complex binds the small GTPase RalA to mediate filopodia formation. Nat. Cell. Biol. 4, 73-78 (2002).
48. Luo, G., Zhang, J., Luca, F. C. & Guo, W. Mitotic phosphorylation of Exo84 disrupts exocyst assembly and arrests cell growth. J. Cell. Biol. 202, 97-111 (2013).
49. Lu, H. et al. Oncogenic BRAF-mediated melanoma cell invasion. Cell. Rep. 15, 2012-2024 (2016).
50. Ren, J. & Guo, W. ERK1/2 regulate exocytosis through direct phosphorylation of the exocyst component Exo70. Dev. Cell. 22, 967-978 (2012).
51. Yang, B. et al. Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nat. Methods 9, 904-906 (2012).
52. Liu, X. & Wang, H. W. Single particle electron microscopy reconstruction of the exosome complex using the random conical tilt method. J. Vis. Exp. 49, 2574 (2011).
53. Li, X., Zheng, S., Agard, D. A. & Cheng, Y. Aysnchronous data acquisition and on-the-fly analysis of dose fractionated cryo-EM images by UCSFImage. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 74-78 (2015).
54. Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584-590 (2013).
55. Scheres, S. H. Beam-induced motion correction for sub-megadalton cryo-EM particles. eLife 3, e03665 (2014).
56. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007).
57. Shaikh, T. R. et al. SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1941-1974 (2008).
58. Mindell, J. A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334-347 (2003).
59. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012).
60. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331-332 (2017).
61. Grant, T. & Grigorieff, N. Automatic estimation and correction of anisotropic magnification distortion in electron microscopes. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 204-208 (2015).
62. Yu, G. et al. An algorithm for estimation and correction of anisotropic magnification distortion of cryo-EM images without need of pre-calibration. J. Struct. Biol. 195, 207-215 (2016).
63. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
64. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63-65 (2014).
65. Scheres, S. H. & Chen, S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 9, 853-854 (2012).
66. Wriggers, W., Milligan, R. A. & McCammon, J. A. Situs: a package for docking crystal structures into low-resolution maps from electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 125, 185-195 (1999).
67. Biasini, M. et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W252-W258 (2014).
68. Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845-858 (2015).
69. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
70. Ding, Y. H. et al. Modeling protein excited-state structures from over-length chemical cross-links. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 1187-1196 (2017).
71. Herzog, F. et al. Structural probing of a protein phosphatase 2 A network by chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Science 337, 1348-1352 (2012).
72. Erzberger, J. P. et al. Molecular architecture of the 40SeIF1eIF3 translation initiation complex. Cell 158, 1123-1135 (2014).
73. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
74. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12-21 (2010).