The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis

Nature Protocols

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 845-858

  Kelley, Lawrence A ^a   Mezulis, Stefans ^a   Yates, Christopher M ^a,b   Wass, Mark N ^a,c   Sternberg, Michael J E ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; LIGAND BINDING; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOFTWARE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; INTERNET; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84930074657     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mukherjee, S., Szilagyi, A., Roy, A. & Zhang, Y. Genome-wide protein structure prediction. in Multiscale Approaches to Protein Modeling (ed. Kolinski, A.) Ch. 11, 255-279 (Springer, 2010).
2. Koonin, E.V., Wolf, Y.I. & Karev, G.P. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420, 218-223 (2002).
3. Kelley, L.A. & Sternberg, M.J.E. Protein structure prediction on the web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 4, 363-371 (2009).
4. Mao, C. et al. Functional assignment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome by genome-scale fold-recognition. Tuberculosis 1, 93 (2013).
5. Lewis, T.E. et al. Genome3D: a UK collaborative project to annotate genomic sequences with predicted 3D structures based on SCOP and CATH domains. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, D499-D507 (2013).
6. Fucile, G. et al. ePlant and the 3D data display initiative: integrative systems biology on the world wide web. PLoS ONE 6, e15237 (2010).
7. Moult, J., Fidelis, K., Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T. & Tramontano, A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round X. Proteins 82 S2: 1-6 (2014).
8. Roy, A., Kucukural, A. & Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 725-738 (2010).
9. Arnold, K., Bordoli, L., Kopp, J. & Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22, 195-201 (2006).
10. Söding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21, 951-960 (2005).
11. Lobley, A., Sadowski, M.I. & Jones, D.T. pGenTHREADER and pDomTHREADER: new methods for improved protein fold recognition and superfamily discrimination. Bioinformatics. 25, 1761-1767 (2009).
12. Raman, S. Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins 77 (suppl. 9), 89-99 (2009).
13. Källberg, M. et al. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1511-1522 (2012).
14. Altschul, S.F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402 (1997).
15. Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A. & Söding, J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat. Methods 9, 173-175 (2012).
16. Jones, D.T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 292, 195-202 (1999).
17. Canutescu, A.A. & Dunbrack, R.L. Cyclic coordinate descent: a robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci. 12, 963-972 (2003).
18. Jefferys, B.R., Kelley, L.A. & Sternberg, M.J. Protein folding requires crowd control in a simulated cell. J. Mol. Biol. 397, 1329-1338 (2010).
19. Rotkiewicz, P. & Skolnick, J. Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1460-1465 (2008).
20. Wei, X. & Sahinidis, N.V. Residue-rotamer-reduction algorithm for the protein side-chain conformation problem. Bioinformatics 22, 188-194 (2006).
21. Arjun, R., Lindahl, E. & Wallner, B. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 224 (2012).
22. Davis, I.W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic acids Res 35 (suppl. 2), W375-W383 (2007).
23. Schmidtke, P., Le Guilloux, V., Maupetit, J. & Tufféry, P. Fpocket: online tools for protein ensemble pocket detection and tracking. Nucleic acids Res 38 (suppl. 2), W582-W589 (2010).
24. Porter, C.T., Bartlett, G.J. & Thornton, J.M. The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic acids Res 32 (suppl. 1), D129-D133 (2004).
25. Yates, C.M., Filippis, I., Kelley, L.A. & Sternberg, M.J. SuSPect: enhanced prediction of single amino acid variant (SAV) phenotype using network features. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 2692-2701 (2014).
26. Capra, J.A. & Singh, M. Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics 23, 1875-1882 (2007).
27. Higurashi, M., Ishida, T. & Kinoshita, K. PiSite: a database of protein interaction sites using multiple binding states in the PDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (Database issue): D360-D364 (2009).
28. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 41 (D1): D348-D352 (2013).
29. Adzhubei, I.A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248-249 (2010).
30. Sim, N. et al. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic acids Res. 40 W1: W452-W457 (2012).
31. González-Pérez, A. & López-Bigas, N. Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 440-449 (2011).
32. Ward, J.J., Sodhi, J.S., McGuffin, L.J., Buxton, B.F. & Jones, D.T. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 635-645 (2004).
33. Siew, N., Elofsson, A., Rychlewski, L. & Fischer, D. MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics. 16, 776-785 (2000).
34. Wass, M.N., Kelley, L.A. & Sternberg, M.J. 3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W469-W473 (2010).
35. Jones, D.T. Improving the accuracy of transmembrane protein topology prediction using evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 3, 538-544 (2007).