Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons' CPR quality: A randomized controlled manikin study

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 480-487

  Baldi, Enrico ^a,b,c   Cornara, Stefano ^a,b,c   Contri, Enrico ^a,b,c   Epis, Francesco ^a,b,c   Fina, Dario ^a,b   Zelaschi, Beatrice ^a,b   Dossena, Cinzia ^a,b,c   Fichtner, Ferdinando ^a,b   Tonani, Michela ^a,b,c   Di Maggio, Marzia ^a,b,d   Zambaiti, Elisa ^a,b,e   Somaschini, Alberto ^a,b,c  

^a IRC Comunit Training Center   (Italy)

^b IRC Comunità Training Center   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPR SCORE; DEFIBRILLATION; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESUSCITATION; TRAINING; VISUAL FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART MASSAGE; MALE; MANIKIN; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TIME FACTOR;

ADULT; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MANIKINS; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85041372685     PISSN: 14818035     EISSN: 14818043     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/cem.2016.410     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Priori SG, Aliot E, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. Task force on sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology [erratum]. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1374-450; Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 257.
2. Kette F, Sbrojavacca R, Rellini G, et al. Epidemiology and survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in north-east Italy: The F.A.C.S. study. Friuli Venezia Giulia Cardiac Arrest Cooperative Study. Resuscitation 1998; 36: 153-9.
3. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, et al. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010; 3: 63-81.
4. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, et al. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1479-87.
5. Cummins RO, Ornato JP, Thies WH, et al. Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "chain of survival" concept. Circulation 1991; 83: 1832-47.
6. Daya MR, Schmicker RH, Zive DM, et al. Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival improving over time: results from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). Resuscitation 2015; 91: 108-15.
7. Iwami T, Kawamura T, Hiraide A, et al. Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2007; 116: 2900-7.
8. Rea TD, Eisenberg MS, Culley LL, et al. Dispatcherassisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001; 104: 2513-6.
9. ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005. American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112: IV-19-34.
10. Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122: S685-705.
11. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132: S414-35.
12. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, et al. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation section collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015; 95: 81-99.
13. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005; 293: 299-304.
14. Mancini ME, Soar J, Bhanji F, et al. Education, implementation, and teams chapter collaborators. Part 12: education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010; 122: S539-81.
15. Bhanji F, Finn JC, Lockey A, et al. Education, implementation, and teams chapter collaborators. Part 8: education, implementation, and teams: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2015; 132(16 Suppl 1): S242-68.
16. Brennan EE, McGraw RC, Brooks SC. Accuracy of instructor assessment of chest compression quality during simulated resuscitation. CJEM 2016; 18: 276-82.
17. Yeung J, Meeks R, Edelson D, et al. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 743-51.
18. Beckers SK, Skorning MH, Fries M, et al. CPREzy improves performance of external chest compressions in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007; 72: 100-7.
19. Monsieurs KG, De Regge M, Vogels C, et al. Improved basic life support performance by ward nurses using the CAREvent Public Access Resuscitator (PAR) in a simulated setting. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 45-50.
20. Spooner BB, Fallaha JF, Kocierz L, et al. An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training. Resuscitation 2007; 73: 417-24.
21. Wik L, Thowsen J, Steen PA. An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training. Resuscitation 2001; 50: 167-72.
22. Pozner CN, Almozlino A, Elmer J, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29: 618-25.
23. Truszewski Z, Szarpak L, Kurowski A, et al. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34: 381-5.
24. Buléon C, Delaunay J, Parienti JJ, et al. Impact of a feedback device on chest compression quality during extended manikin cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34: 1754-60.
25. Kirkbright S, Finn J, Tohira H, et al. Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and nonrandomised trials. Resuscitation 2014; 85: 460-71.
26. Nolan JP. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2014; 20: 227-33.
27. Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, et al. The influence of scenario-based training and real-time audiovisual feedback on out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 62: 47-56.
28. Buléon C, Parienti JJ, Halbout L, et al. Improvement in chest compression quality using a feedback device (CPRmeter): a simulation randomized crossover study. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31: 1457-61.
29. Krasteva V, Jekova I, Didon JP. An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin. Physiol Meas 2011; 32: 687-99.
30. González-Salvado V, Fernández-Méndez F, Barcala-Furelos R, et al. Very brief training for laypeople in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Effect of real-time feedback. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34: 993-8.
31. Pavo N, Goliasch G, Nierscher FJ, et al. Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016; 24: 70.
32. Sutton RM, Donoghue A, Myklebust H, et al. The voice advisory manikin (VAM): an innovative approach to pediatric lay provider basic life support skill education. Resuscitation 2007; 75: 161-8.
33. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, et al. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation 2002; 52: 273-9.
34. Lynch B, Einspruch EL, Nichol G, et al. Effectiveness of a 30-min CPR self-instruction program for lay responders: a controlled randomized study. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 31-43.
35. Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, et al. Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1152-5.
36. Field RA, Soar J, Davies RP, et al. The impact of chest compression rates on quality of chest compressions-A manikin study. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 360-4.
37. Martin P, Theobald P, Kemp A, et al. Real-time feedback can improve infant manikin cardiopulmonary resuscitation by up to 79%-A randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation 2013; 84: 1125-30.
38. Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Wik L, et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006; 71: 283-92.