An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 687-699

  Krasteva, Vessela ^a   Jekova, Irena ^a   Didon, Jean Philippe ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Bulgaria)

^b Schiller Medical SAS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; FEEDBACK; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

BASIC LIFE SUPPORTS; CHEST COMPRESSIONS; CONTROL DEVICE; FEEDBACK DEVICE; HIGH QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; PRE-TRAINING; SELF-TRAINING; TRAINING PROCESS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

RESUSCITATION;

EID: 79957701701     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/6/006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abella B S, Alvarado J P, Myklebust H, Edelson D P, Barry A, O'Hearn N, Vanden Hoek T L and Becker L B 2005a Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest JAMA 293 305-10 (Pubitemid 40116085)
2. Abella B S, et al. 2005b Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest Circulation 111 428-34 (Pubitemid 40204426)
3. Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 1966 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: statement of the Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of the Division of Medical Sciences, National Research Council JAMA 198 372-9
4. American Heart Association 2005 Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Adult basic life support Circulation 112 19-34
5. Bossaert L and Van Hoeyweghen R 1989 Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group Resuscitation 17 (Suppl.) S55-69
6. Broomfield R 1996 A quasi-experimental research to investigate the retention of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills and knowledge by qualified nurses following a course in professional development J. Adv. Nurs. 23 1016-23 (Pubitemid 126438779)
7. Christenson J, et al. 2009 Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation Circulation 120 1241-7
8. Gallagher E J, Lombardi G and Gennis P 1995 Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest JAMA 274 1922-5 (Pubitemid 26003061)
9. Handley A J and Handley S A J 2003 Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator Resuscitation 57 57-62 (Pubitemid 36369231)
10. Herlitz J, Svensson L, Holmberg S, ngquist K A and Young M 2005 Efficacy of bystander CPR: intervention by lay people and by health care professionals Resuscitation 66 291-5 (Pubitemid 41219377)
11. Hostler D, Wang H, Parrish K, Platt T E and Guimond G 2005 The effect of a voice advisory manikin (VAM) system on CPR quality among prehospital providers Prehosp. Emerg. Care 9 53-60 (Pubitemid 41656728)
12. Jekova I, Krasteva V, Neycheva T, Mudrov N, Kostov Zh and Didon J P 2009 Cardio compression control device: development, calibration and testing Bioautomation 13 83-96
13. Kaye W and Mancini M E 1986 Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by physicians, registered nurses, and the general public Crit. Care Med. 14 620-2 (Pubitemid 16065933)
14. Ko P C, Chen W J, Lin C H, Ma M H and Lin F Y 2005 Evaluating the quality of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by reviewing automated external defibrillator records and survival for out-of-hospital witnessed arrests Resuscitation 64 163-9 (Pubitemid 40175084)
15. Noordergraaf G J, Drinkwaard B W, van Berkom P F, van Hemert H P, Venema A, Scheffer G J and Noordergraaf A 2006 The quality of chest compressions by trained personnel: the effect of feedback, via the CPREzy, in a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model Resuscitation 69 241-52 (Pubitemid 44294453)
16. degaard S, Kramer-Johansen J, Bromley A, Myklebust H, Nysaether J, Wik L and Steen P A 2007 Chest compressions by ambulance personnel on chests with variable stiffness: abilities and attitudes Resuscitation 74 127-34 (Pubitemid 46891672)
17. Park D, Cho G C, Ryu J Y, You J Y and Oh D J 2008 The effect of a real time audiovisual feedback system on the quality of chest compressions by trained personnel during resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model J. Korean Soc. Emerg. Med. 19 37-44
18. Sayre M R, Berg R A, Cave D M, Page R L, Potts J and White R D 2008 Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: a science advisory for the public from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee Circulation 117 2162-7 (Pubitemid 351572175)
19. Van Hoeyweghen R J, Bossaert L L, Mullie A, Calle P, Martens P, Buylaert W A and Delooz H 1993 Quality and efficiency of bystander CPR Resuscitation 26 47-52 (Pubitemid 23256343)
20. Wesley A K 2006 Improving the hemodynamics of CPR. AHA guidelines support timely and effective CPR Emerg. Med. Serv. 35 82-5
21. Wik L, Mykleust H, Auestad B and Steen P A 2005 Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback Resuscitation 66 27-30 (Pubitemid 40922756)
22. Wik L, Steen P A and Bircher N G 1994 Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation 28 195-203
23. Wik L, Thowsen J and Steen P A 2001 An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training Resuscitation 50 167-72 (Pubitemid 32823454)