Deeper learning in collaborative concept mapping: A mixed methods study of conflict resolution

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 87, Issue , 2018, Pages 424-435

  Chen, Weichao ^a   Allen, Carla ^b   Jonassen, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

CONCEPT MAPPING; CONFLICT NEGOTIATION; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; EFFECTIVE INTERACTIONS; HEALTH CARE EDUCATION; INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT; MIXED METHOD; TEAM MEMBERS;

MAPPING;

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT MAPPING; CONFLICT; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STUDENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY;

EID: 85040644395     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Amason, A.C., Thompson, K.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Harrison, A.W., Conflict: An important dimension in successful management teams. Organizational Dynamics 24:2 (1995), 20–35.
2. Barron, B., When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12:3 (2003), 307–359.
3. Behfar, K.J., Peterson, R.S., Mannix, E.A., Trochim, W.M.K., The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 93:1 (2008), 170–188.
4. Bielaczyc, K., Collins, A., Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. Reigeluth, C.M., (eds.) Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 1999, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 269–292.
5. Bradley, B.H., Postlethwaite, B.E., Klotz, A.C., Hamdani, M.R., Brown, K.G., Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology 97:1 (2012), 151–158.
6. Burgess, A.W., Roberts, C., Black, K.I., Mellis, C., Senior medical student perceived ability and experience in giving peer feedback in formative long case examinations. BMC Medical Education, 13, 2013, 79.
7. Carr, S.E., Brand, G., Wei, L., Wright, H., Nicol, P., Metcalfe, H., et al. “Helping someone with a skill sharpens it in your own mind”: A mixed method study exploring health professions students experiences of peer assisted learning (PAL). BMC Medical Education, 16, 2016, 48.
8. Chan, C., Burtis, J., Bereiter, C., Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction 15:1 (1997), 1–40.
9. Chen, W., Knowledge convergence among pre-service mathematics teachers through online reciprocal peer feedback. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: International Journal 9:1 (2017), 1–18.
10. Chen, W., Allen, C., Concept mapping: Providing assessment of, for, and as learning. Medical Science Educator. 27:2 (2017), 149–153.
11. Chen, W., Allen, C., Jonassen, D., Does collaborative concept mapping enhance group members’ knowledge convergence?. Proceedings of the 17th global Chinese conference on computers in education, 2013, 47–53 (Beijing, China).
12. Chen, W., Moore, J., Vo, N., Formative evaluation with novice designers: Two case studies within an online multimedia development course. International Journal of Instructional Media 39:2 (2012), 95–111.
13. Cho, Y.H., Cho, K., Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science 39:5 (2011), 629–643.
14. Coleman, E.B., Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 7:3/4 (1998), 387–427.
15. Creswell, J.W., Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed., 2012, Pearson, Boston, MA.
16. Cushing, A., Abbott, S., Lothian, D., Hall, A., Westwood, O.M.R., Peer feedback as an aid to learning – what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!. Medical Teacher 33:2 (2011), e105–e112.
17. Daley, B.J., Torre, D.M., Concept maps in medical education: An analytical literature review. Medical Education 44:5 (2010), 440–448.
18. Davis, M., Curtis, M., Tschetter, J., Evaluating cognitive training outcomes: Validity and utility of structural knowledge assessment. Journal of Business and Psychology 18:2 (2003), 191–206.
19. Day, E.A., Arthur, W.J., Gettman, D., Knowledge structures and the acquisition of a complex skill. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:5 (2001), 1022–1033.
20. Dearholt, D., Schvaneveldt, R., Properties of pathfinder networks. Schvaneveldt, R.W., (eds.) Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization, 1990, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1–30.
21. Draper, D.C., The instructional effects of knowledge-based community of practice learning environment on student achievement and knowledge convergence. Performance Improvement Quarterly 25:4 (2013), 67–89.
22. Duschl, R., Osborne, J., Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education 38:1 (2002), 39–72.
23. Engelmann, T., Hesse, F.W., How digital concept maps about the collaborators’ knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5:3 (2010), 299–319.
24. Engelmann, T., Tergan, S.-O., Hesse, F.W., Evoking knowledge and information awareness for enhancing computer-supported collaborative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education 78:2 (2010), 268–290.
25. Ferry, B., Hedberg, J., Harper, B., How do preservice teachers use concept maps to organize their curriculum content knowledge?. Journal of Internet Law 9:1 (1998), 83–104.
26. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C., Mandl, H., Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12:2 (2002), 213–232.
27. Fischer, F., Mandl, H., Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external knowledge representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14:3 (2005), 405–441.
28. Gijlers, H., de Jong, T., Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 22:3 (2013), 340–374.
29. Goldsmith, T.E., Davenport, D., Assessing structural similarity of graphs. Schvaneveldt, R.W., (eds.) Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization, 1990, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 75–87.
30. Goldsmith, T.E., Johnson, P.J., Acton, W.H., Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology 83:1 (1991), 88–96.
31. Greer, L.L., Saygi, O., Aaldering, H., de Dreu, C.K.W., Conflict in medical teams: Opportunity or danger?. Medical Education 46:10 (2012), 935–942.
32. Harper, M.E., Hoeft, R.M., Evans, A.W., Jentsch, F.G., Scoring concepts maps: Can a practical method of scoring concept maps be used to assess trainee's knowledge structures?. Paper presented at the human factors and ergonomics society 48th annual meeting, 2004 Sepember (New Orleans, LA, USA).
33. Jeong, H., Chi, M., Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science 35:4 (2007), 287–315.
34. Jonassen, D., Beissner, K., Yacci, M.A., Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
35. Jonassen, D., Kim, B., Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research & Development 58:4 (2010), 439–457.
36. Jorg, T., On reinventing education in the age of complexity: A Vygotsky-inspired generative complexity approach. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 14(2), 2017 Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/complicity/index.php/complicity/article/view/29334.
37. Kalishman, S., Stoddard, H., O'Sullivan, P., Don't manage the conflict: Transform it through collaboration. Medical Education 46:10 (2012), 930–932.
38. Krippendorff, K., Content analysis: An Introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed., 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
39. Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., Crumbaugh, C., Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. Olson, D., Torrance, N., (eds.) The handbook of education and human development, 1996, Blackwell, Malden, MA, 731–764.
40. Li, L., Liu, X., Steckelberg, A.L., Assessor or Assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 41:3 (2010), 525–536.
41. Lim, B., Klein, K.J., Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27:4 (2006), 403–418.
42. Liu, X., The validity and reliability of concept mapping as an alternative science assessment when item response theory is used for scoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association, 1994 (New Orleans, LA, USA).
43. Lumpe, A.T., Staver, J.R., Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32:1 (1995), 71–98.
44. Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S., Zaccaro, S.J., The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 87:1 (2002), 3–13.
45. McMurtry, A., Rohse, S., Kilgour, K.N., Socio-material perspectives on interprofessional team and collaborative learning. Medical Education 50:2 (2016), 169–180.
46. Moon, B., Hoffman, R., Novak, J., Cañas, A., Applied concept mapping: Capturing, analyzing, and organizing knowledge. 2011, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
47. Novak, J.D., Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. 2nd ed., 2010, Routledge, New York, NY.
48. Pankratius, W.J., Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27:4 (1990), 315–333.
49. Patton, M.Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed., 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
50. Peng, K., Nisbett, R., Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist 54:9 (1999), 741–754.
51. Poindexter, M.T., Clariana, R.B., The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing on structural knowledge and traditional learning outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Media 33:2 (2006), 177–184.
52. Pudelko, B., Young, M., Vincent-Lamarre, P., Charlin, B., Mapping as a learning strategy in health professions education: A critical analysis. Medical Education 46:12 (2012), 1215–1225.
53. Roberts, L., Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology 30:5 (1999), 707–717.
54. Roschelle, J., Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2:3 (1992), 235–276.
55. Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.D., The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. O'Malley, C., (eds.) Computer supported collaborative learning, 1995, Springer, New York, NY, 69–97.
56. Roth, W., Roychoudhury, A., The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education 76:5 (1992), 531–557.
57. Roth, W., Roychoudhury, A., The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30:5 (1993), 503–534.
58. Rye, J.A., Rubba, P.A., Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science & Mathematics 102:1 (2002), 33–44.
59. Salomon, G., Perkins, D., Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education 23 (1998), 1–24.
60. Sizmur, S., Osborne, J., Learning processes and collaborative concept-mapping. International Journal of Science Education 19:10 (1997), 1117–1135.
61. Stout, R.J., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Milanovich, D.M., Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors 41:1 (1999), 61–71.
62. Stoyanova, N., Kommers, P., Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13:1/2 (2002), 111–133.
63. Taricani, E.M., Clariana, R.B., A technique for automatically scoring open-ended concept maps. Educational Technology Research & Development 54:1 (2006), 65–82.
64. Teasley, S., Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration?. Resnick, L.B., Säljö R., Pontecorvo, C., Burge, B., (eds.) Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Situated cognition and technologically supported environments, 1997, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 361–384.
65. Tolsgaard, M.G., Kulasegaram, K.M., Ringsted, C.V., Collaborative learning of clinical skills in health professions education: The why, how, when and for whom. Medical Education 50:1 (2016), 69–78.
66. Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., Kanselaar, G., Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10:4 (2000), 311–330.
67. Weaver, S.J., Dy, S.M., Rosen, M.A., Team-training in healthcare: A narrative synthesis of the literature. BMJ Quality and Safety, 2014, 1–14.
68. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 46:1 (2006), 71–95.
69. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction 17:4 (2007), 416–426.
70. West, D.C., Park, J.K., Pomeroy, J.R., Sandoval, J., Concept mapping assessment in medical education: A comparison of two scoring systems. Medical Education 36:9 (2002), 820–826.
71. Zheng, L., Chen, N.-S., Huang, R., Yang, K., A novel approach to assess collaborative learning processes and group performance through the knowledge convergence. Journal of Computers in Education 1:2–3 (2014), 167–185.