How digital concept maps about the collaborators' knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 299-319

  Engelmann, Tanja ^a   Hesse, Friedrich W ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer supported collaboration; Computer supported collaborative problem solving; Group awareness; Knowledge and information awareness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955049873     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-010-9089-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bortz, J. (1999). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.
2. Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: American Psychological Association.
3. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
4. Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 107-112.
5. Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2007). Fostering audience design of computer-mediated knowledge communication by knowledge mirroring. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 168-170). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
6. Engelmann, T., Tergan, S.-O., & Hesse, F. W. (2010). Evoking knowledge and information awareness for enhancing computer-supported collaborative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 1-20.
7. Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 239-263.
8. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-219.
9. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989b). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509-526.
10. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1991). Accuracy and bias in estimates of others' knowledge. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 445-454.
11. Gross, T., Stary, C., & Totter, A. (2005). User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: Structured embedding of findings from social sciences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 323-360.
12. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 411-446.
13. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037-1065.
14. Keller, T., & Tergan, S.-O. (2005). Visualizing knowledge and information: An introduction. In S.-O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization-Searching for synergies (pp. 1-23). Berlin: Springer.
15. Keysar, B., Ginzel, L. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (1995). States of affairs and states of mind: The effects of knowledge of beliefs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 283-293.
16. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
17. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9, 2-24.
18. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
19. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
20. Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119.
21. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know-and sometimes misjudge-what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737-759.
22. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Pierce, C. A., Block, R. A., & Aguinis, H. (2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), 916-924.
24. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism. A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
25. Tergan, S.-O. (2005). Digital concept maps for managing knowledge and information. In S.-O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization. Searching for synergies (pp. 173-191). Berlin: Springer.
26. Tergan, S.-O., Keller, T., & Burkhard, R. (2006). Integrating knowledge and information: Digital concept maps as a bridging technology. Information Visualization, 5(3), 167-174.
27. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behaviour (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer.
28. Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3), 319-339.