Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 33, Issue , 2018, Pages 99-117

  Kievit, Rogier A ^a,b   Brandmaier, Andreas M ^a,c   Ziegler, Gabriel ^d,e   van Harmelen, Anne Laura ^f   de Mooij, Susanne M M ^g   Moutoussis, Michael ^a,h   Goodyer, Ian M ^f   Bullmore, Ed ^f,i,j,k   Jones, Peter B ^f,i   Fonagy, Peter ^h   Lindenberger, Ulman ^a,c,l   Dolan, Raymond J ^a,h  

^a MAX PLANCK UCL CENTRE FOR COMPUTATIONAL PSYCHIATRY AND AGEING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^d OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND PETERBOROUGH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^j GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^l EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Adolescence; Development; Individual differences; Latent change scores; Longitudinal modelling; Structural equation modelling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CAUSALITY; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FUZZY SYSTEM; HUMAN; LATENT CHANGE SCORE; LIFESPAN; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 85040132806     PISSN: 18789293     EISSN: 18789307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.007     Document Type: Review

References (160)

1. Ahmed, S.P., Bittencourt-Hewitt, A., Sebastian, C.L., Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2015), 11–25, 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.006.
2. Aho, K., Derryberry, D., Peterson, T., Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC. Ecology 95:3 (2014), 631–636, 10.1890/13-1452.1.
3. ® Amos ™ 19 User's Guide. 2010 Retrieved from http://amosdevelopment.com.
4. Ashburner, J., Ridgway, G.R., Symmetric diffeomorphic modeling of longitudinal structural MRI. Front. Neurosci., 6, 2012, 197, 10.3389/fnins.2012.00197.
5. Ashburner, J., A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38:1 (2007), 95–113, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007.
6. Baltes, P., Reese, H.W., Nesselroade, J.R., Life-Span Developmental Psychology: Introduction to Research Methods. 1977, Brooks-Cole, Monterey Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/3760900/life-span-developmental-psychology-introduction-to.
7. Baraldi, A.N., Enders, C.K., An introduction to modern missing data analyses. J. School Psychol. 48 (2010), 5–37, 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.
8. Barrett, P., Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 42:5 (2007), 815–824, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018.
9. Bauer, D.J., Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 28:2 (2003), 135–167, 10.3102/10769986028002135.
10. Bauer, D.J., Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42:4 (2007), 757–786, 10.1080/00273170701710338.
11. Bender, A.R., Prindle, J.J., Brandmaier, A.M., Raz, N., White matter and memory in healthy adults: coupled changes over two years. Neuroimage 131 (2015), 193–204, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.085.
12. Bengtsson, S.L., Nagy, Z., Skare, S., Forsman, L., Forssberg, H., Ullén, F., Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development. Nat. Neurosci. 8:9 (2005), 1148–1150, 10.1038/nn1516.
13. Bentler, P.M., On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 42:5 (2007), 825–829, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024.
14. Bernal-Rusiel, J.L., Greve, D.N., Reuter, M., Fischl, B., Sabuncu, M.R., Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Statistical analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data with Linear Mixed Effects models. Neuroimage 66 (2013), 249–260, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.065.
15. Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., Fox, J., et al. OpenMx: an open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 76:2 (2011), 306–317, 10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6.
16. Bollen, K.A., Curran, P.J., Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models a synthesis of two traditions. Sociol. Methods Res. 32:3 (2004), 336–383, 10.1177/0049124103260222.
17. Bollen, K.A., Diamantopoulos, A., In defense of causal-formative indicators: a minority report. Psychol. Methods 22:3 (2015), 581–596, 10.1037/met0000056.
18. Bollen, K.A., Structural Equations with Latent Variables. 1989, Wiley, New York.
19. Bramen, J.E., Hranilovich, J.A., Dahl, R.E., Chen, J., Rosso, C., Forbes, E.E., Dinov, I., et al. Sex matters during adolescence: testosterone-related cortical thickness maturation differs between boys and girls. PLoS One, 7(3), 2012, e33850, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033850.
20. Brandmaier, A.M., von Oertzen, T., McArdle, J.J., Lindenberger, U., Structural equation model trees. Psychol. Methods 18:1 (2013), 71–86, 10.1037/a0030001.
21. Brandmaier, A.M., Prindle, J.J., McArdle, J.J., Lindenberger, U., Theory-guided exploration with structural equation model forests. Psychol. Methods 21:4 (2016), 566–582, 10.1037/met0000090.
22. Brandmaier, A.M., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., Hertzog, C., Lindenberger, U., LIFESPAN: A tool for the computer-aided design of longitudinal studies. Front. Pychol., 2015, 6.
23. Callaghan, M.F., Freund, P., Draganski, B., Anderson, E., Cappelletti, M., Chowdhury, R., Weiskopf, N., et al. Widespread age-related differences in the human brain microstructure revealed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol. Aging 35:8 (2014), 1862–1872, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.008.
24. Chang, W., Cheng, J., Allaire, J.J., shiny: Web Application Framework for R. 2016.
25. Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 9:2 (2002), 233–255, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
26. Chow, S.-M., Grimm, K.J., Filteau, G., Dolan, C.V., McArdle, J.J., Regime-switching bivariate dual change score model. Multivar. Behav. Res. 48:4 (2013), 463–502, 10.1080/00273171.2013.787870.
27. Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988, NJ Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hilsdale.
28. Coman, E.N., Picho, K., McArdle, J.J., Villagra, V., Dierker, L., Iordache, E., The paired t-test as a simple latent change score model. Front. Psychol., 4, 2013, 738, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00738.
29. Crone, E.A., Dahl, R.E., Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13:9 (2012), 636–650, 10.1038/nrn3313.
30. Cuadra, M.B., Cammoun, L., Butz, T., Cuisenaire, O., Thiran, J.-P., Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24:12 (2005), 1548–1565, 10.1109/TMI.2005.857652.
31. Curran, P.J., Obeidat, K., Losardo, D., Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. J. Cogn. Dev. 11:2 (2010), 121–136, 10.1080/15248371003699969.
32. Curran, P.J., Howard, A.L., Bainter, S.A., Lane, S.T., McGinley, J.S., The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: a latent curve model with structured residuals. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 82:5 (2014), 879–894, 10.1037/a0035297.
33. Curran, P.J., Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?. Multiva. Behav. Res. 38:4 (2003), 529–569, 10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5.
34. Driver, C.C., Oud, J.H.L., Voelkle, M.C., Continuous time structural equation modelling with R package ctsem. J. Statist. Softw., 77(5), 2016.
35. Eager, C., Roy, J., Mixed Effects Models are Sometimes Terrible. 2017 Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04858.
36. Enders, C.K., A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 8:1 (2001), 128–141, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_7.
37. Fan, X., Thompson, B., Wang, L., Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 6:1 (1999), 56–83, 10.1080/10705519909540119.
38. Ferrer, E., McArdle, J.J., An experimental analysis of dynamic hypotheses about cognitive abilities and achievement from childhood to early adulthood. Dev. Psychol. 40:6 (2004), 935–952.
39. Ferrer, E., Balluerka, N., Widaman, K.F., Factorial invariance and the specification of second-order latent growth models. Methodology 4:1 (2008), 22–36, 10.1027/1614-2241.4.1.22.
40. Ferrer, E., Shaywitz, B.A., Holahan, J.M., Marchione, K., Shaywitz, S.E., Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychol. Sci. 21:1 (2010), 93–101, 10.1177/0956797609354084.
41. Fox, J., TEACHER'S CORNER: structural equation modeling with the sem package in R. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 13:3 (2006), 465–486, 10.1207/s15328007sem1303_7.
42. Gerbing, D.W., Anderson, J.C., Improper solutions in the analysis of covariance structures: their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecifications. Psychometrika 52:1 (1987), 99–111, 10.1007/BF02293958.
43. Gesell, A., Maturation and infant behavior pattern. Psychol. Rev. 36:4 (1929), 307–319, 10.1037/h0075379.
44. Ghisletta, P., Lindenberger, U., Age-based structural dynamics between perceptual speed and knowledge in the Berlin aging study: direct evidence for ability dedifferentiation in old age. Psychol. Aging 18:4 (2003), 696–713, 10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.696.
45. Ghisletta, P., McArdle, J.J., Teacher's corner: latent curve models and latent change score models estimated in R. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 19:4 (2012), 651–682, 10.1080/10705511.2012.713275.
46. Giedd, J.N., Raznahan, A., Mills, K.L., Lenroot, R.K., Cohen, S.B., Lombardo, M., Hare, T., et al. Review: magnetic resonance imaging of male/female differences in human adolescent brain anatomy. Biol. Sex Diff., 3(1), 2012, 19, 10.1186/2042-6410-3-19.
47. Gorbach, T., Pudas, S., Lundquist, A., Orädd, G., Josefsson, M., Salami, A., Nyberg, L., et al. Longitudinal association between hippocampus atrophy and episodic-memory decline. Neurobiol. Aging 51 (2016), 167–176, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.12.002.
48. Grimm, K.J., Multivariate longitudinal methods for studying developmental relationships between depression and academic achievement. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 31:4 (2007), 328–339, 10.1177/0165025407077754.
49. Hamaker, E.L., Kuiper, R.M., Grasman, R.P.P.P., A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol. Methods 20:1 (2015), 102–116, 10.1037/a0038889.
50. Hansen, W.B., Collins, L.M., Seven ways to increase power without increasing N. NIDA Res. Monogr. 142 (1994), 184–195 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9243537.
51. Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., Boulianne, S., Testing! testing! one, two, three—testing the theory in structural equation models!. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 42:5 (2007), 841–850, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001.
52. Helms, G., Draganski, B., Frackowiak, R., Ashburner, J., Weiskopf, N., Improved segmentation of deep brain grey matter structures using magnetization transfer (MT) parameter maps. Neuroimage 47:1 (2009), 194–198, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.053.
53. Hertzog, C., Lindenberger, U., Ghisletta, P., von Oertzen, T., On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change. Psychol. Methods 11:3 (2006), 244–252 Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/met/11/3/244.
54. Hertzog, C., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., Lindenberger, U., Evaluating the power of latent growth curve models to detect individual differences in change. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 15:4 (2008), 541–563, 10.1080/10705510802338983.
55. Hoyle, R.H., (eds.) Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 2014, Guilford press.
56. Jöreskog, K.G., How Large Can a Standardized Coefficient be?. 1999 Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf.
57. Jackson, D.L., The effect of the number of observations per parameter in misspecified confirmatory factor analytic models. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 14:1 (2007), 48–76, 10.1080/10705510709336736.
58. Jacobucci, R., Grimm, K.J., McArdle, J.J., Regularized structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 23:4 (2016), 555–566, 10.1080/10705511.2016.1154793.
59. Jajodia, Archana, Dynamic Structural Equation Models of Change. 2012, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
60. Johnson, M.H., Interactive specialization: a domain-general framework for human functional brain development?. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 1:1 (2011), 7–21, 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003.
61. Jorgensen, T.D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., Rosseel, Y., Quick, C., Al, E., et al. Package semTools. 2015.
62. Kiddle, B., Inkster, B., Prabhu, G., Moutoussis, M., Whitaker, K., Consortium, N., Jones, P., et al. The NSPN 2400 Cohort: A developmental sample supporting the Wellcome Trust Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network. 2017, 10.17863/CAM.11026.
63. Kievit, R.A., Romeijn, J.-W., Waldorp, L.J., Wicherts, J.M., Scholte, H.S., Borsboom, D., Mind the gap: a psychometric approach to the reduction problem. Psychol. Inquiry 22:2 (2011), 67–87, 10.1080/1047840X.2011.550181.
64. Kievit, R.A., Frankenhuis, W.E., Waldorp, L.J., Borsboom, D., Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide. Front. Psychol., 4, 2013, 513, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513.
65. Kievit, R.A., Lindenberger, U., Goodyer, I.M., Jones, P.B., Fonagy, P., Bullmore, E.T., Dolan, R.J., et al. Mutualistic coupling between vocabulary and reasoning supports cognitive development during late adolescence and early adulthood. Psychol. Sci. 28:10 (2017), 1419–1431.
66. Kline, R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2011 Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=mGf3Ex59AX0C&pgis=1.
67. Lövdén, M., Li, S.-C., Shing, Y.L., Lindenberger, U., Within-person trial-to-trial variability precedes and predicts cognitive decline in old and very old age: longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study. Neuropsychologia 45:12 (2007), 2827–2838, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.005.
68. Lövdén, M., Bodammer, N.C., Kühn, S., Kaufmann, J., Schütze, H., Tempelmann, C., Lindenberger, U., et al. Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age. Neuropsychologia 48:13 (2010), 3878–3883, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.026.
69. Lövdén, M., Köhncke, Y., Laukka, E.J., Kalpouzos, G., Salami, A., Li, T.-Q., Bäckman, L., et al. Changes in perceptual speed and white matter microstructure in the corticospinal tract are associated in very old age. Neuroimage 102P2 (2014), 520–530, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.020.
70. Larsen, R., Missing data imputation versus full information maximum likelihood with second-level dependencies. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 18:4 (2011), 649–662, 10.1080/10705511.2011.607721.
71. Lindenberger, U., Poetter, U., The complex nature of unique and shared effects in hierarchical linear regression: implications for developmental psychology. Psychol. Methods 3:2 (1998), 218–230.
72. Lindenberger, U., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., Hertzog, C., Cross-sectional age variance extraction: what's change got to do with it?. Psychol. Aging 26:1 (2011), 34–47 Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/pag/26/1/34.
73. Little, T.D., Lindenberger, U., Nesselroade, J.R., On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: when good indicators are bad and bad indicators are good. Psychol. Methods 4:2 (1999), 192–211, 10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.192.
74. Little, T.D., Longitudinal structural equation modeling. 2013.
75. Maass, A., Düzel, S., Goerke, M., Becke, A., Sobieray, U., Neumann, K., Düzel, E., et al. Vascular hippocampal plasticity after aerobic exercise in older adults. Mol. Psychiatry 20:5 (2015), 585–593, 10.1038/mp.2014.114.
76. MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., Necowitz, L.B., Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychol. Bull. 111:3 (1992), 490–504, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490.
77. Madhyastha, T., Peverill, M., Koh, N., McCabe, C., Flournoy, J., Mills, K., McLaughlin, K.A., Current methods and limitations for longitudinal fMRI analysis across development. Dev. Cognit. Neurosci., 2017 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929317300713.
78. Malone, P.S., Lansford, J.E., Castellino, D.R., Berlin, L.J., Dodge, K.A., Bates, J.E., Pettit, G.S., Divorce and child behavior problems: applying latent change score models to life event data. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 11:3 (2004), 401–423, 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_6.
79. McArdle, J.J., Grimm, K.J., Five steps in latent curve and latent change score modeling with longitudinal data. Longitudinal Research with Latent Variables, 2010, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 245–273, 10.1007/978-3-642-11760-2_8.
80. McArdle, J.J., Hamagami, F., Advanced studies of individual differences linear dynamic models for longitudinal data analysis. Marcoulides, G.A., Schumacker, R.E., (eds.) New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling, 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London, 203–246, 10.1037/10409-005.
81. McArdle, J.J., Hamagami, F., Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. New Methods for the Analysis of Change. Decade of Behavior, 2001, 139–175.
82. McArdle, J.J., Nesselroade, J.R., Using Multivariate Data to Structure Developmental Change. 1994, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
83. McArdle, J.J., Hamagami, F., Jones, K., Jolesz, F., Kikinis, R., Spiro, A., Albert, M.S., Structural modeling of dynamic changes in memory and brain structure using longitudinal data from the normative aging study. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 59:6 (2004), 294–304, 10.1093/GERONB/59.6.P294.
84. McArdle, J.J., Structural factor analysis experiments with incomplete data. Multivar. Behav. Res. 29:4 (1994), 409–454, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2904_5.
85. McArdle, J.J., Latent Variable Modeling of Differences and Changes with Longitudinal Data. 2008 Retrieved from http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612?journalCode=psych.
86. McArdle, J.J., Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60:October 2008 (2009), 577–605, 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612.
87. McNeish, D., Matta, T., Differentiating between mixed effects and latent curve approaches to growth modeling. Behav. Res. Methods, 2017, 1–17, 10.13140/RG.2.2.21184.74243 [Epub ahead of print].
88. McNeish, D., An, J., Hancock, G.R., The thorny relation between measurement quality and fit index cutoffs in latent variable models. J. Pers. Assess., 2017, 1–10, 10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286.
89. Mehta, P.D., West, S.G., Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychol. Methods 5:1 (2000), 23–43, 10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.23.
90. Meredith, W., Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58:4 (1993), 525–543, 10.1007/BF02294825.
91. Merkle, E.C., Rosseel, Y., 2015. blavaan: Bayesian structural equation models via parameter expansion. arXiv, (Rosseel 2012). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05604.
92. Merkle, E.C., You, D., Preacher, K.J., Testing nonnested structural equation models. Psychol. Methods 21:2 (2016), 151–163, 10.1037/met0000038.
93. Mills, K.L., Goddings, A.-L., Clasen, L.S., Giedd, J.N., Blakemore, S.-J., The developmental mismatch in structural brain maturation during adolescence. Dev. Neurosci. 36:3–4 (2014), 147–160, 10.1159/000362328.
94. Millsap, R.E., Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. 2011, Routledge.
95. Moshagen, M., Erdfelder, E., A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 23:1 (2016), 54–60, 10.1080/10705511.2014.950896.
96. Muetzel, R.L., Blanken, L.M.E., van der Ende, J., El Marroun, H., Shaw, P., Sudre, G., White, T., et al. Tracking brain development and dimensional psychiatric symptoms in children: a longitudinal population-based neuroimaging study. Am. J. Psychiatry, 2017, 1–9, 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070813.
97. Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychol. Methods 17:3 (2012), 313–335, 10.1037/a0026802.
98. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O., How to use a monte carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 9:4 (2002), 599–620, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8.
99. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O., Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User's Guide. 2005, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles.
100. Neale, M.C., Individual Fit, Heterogeneity, and Missing Data in Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling. 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
101. Newsom, J.T., Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling: A Comprehensive Introduction. 2015, Routledge, London.
102. Newton-Smith, W., Lukes, S., The underdetermination of theory by data. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. Suppl., 52, 1978, 10.2307/4106790 71-91-107.
103. Oertzen, T., Hertzog, C., Lindenberger, U., Ghisletta, P., The effect of multiple indicators on the power to detect inter-individual differences in change. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 63:3 (2010), 627–646, 10.1348/000711010X486633.
104. Olsson, U.H., Foss, T., Troye, S.V., Howell, R.D., The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 7:4 (2000), 557–595, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_3.
105. Pearl, J., Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. 2000, MIT press, Cambridge.
106. Pearl, J., The Causal Foundations of Structural Equation Modeling. 2012 Retrieved from http://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r370.pdf.
107. Petscher, Y., Quinn, J.M., Wagner, R.K., Modeling the co-development of correlated processes with longitudinal and cross-construct effects. Dev. Psychol. 52:11 (2016), 1690–1704.
108. Poldrack, R.A., Gorgolewski, K.J., Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging. Nat. Neurosci. 17:11 (2014), 1510–1517, 10.1038/nn.3818.
109. Quinn, J.M., Wagner, R.K., Petscher, Y., Lopez, D., Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: a latent change score modeling study. Child Dev. 86:1 (2015), 159–175, 10.1111/cdev.12292.
110. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2016 Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org.
111. Rajapakse, J.C., Giedd, J.N., Rapoport, J.L., Statistical approach to segmentation of single-channel cerebral MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16:2 (1997), 176–186, 10.1109/42.563663.
112. Rast, P., Hofer, S.M., Longitudinal design considerations to optimize power to detect variances and covariances among rates of change: simulation results based on actual longitudinal studies. Psychol. Methods 19:1 (2014), 133–154, 10.1037/a0034524.
113. Raykov, T., Penev, S., On structural equation model equivalence. Multivar. Behav. Res. 34:2 (1999), 199–244, 10.1207/S15327906Mb340204.
114. Raz, N., Lindenberger, U., Rodrigue, K.M., Kennedy, K.M., Head, D., Williamson, A., Acker, J.D., et al. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb. Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991) 15:11 (2005), 1676–1689, 10.1093/cercor/bhi044.
115. Raz, N., Schmiedek, F., Rodrigue, K.M., Kennedy, K.M., Lindenberger, U., Lövdén, M., Differential brain shrinkage over 6months shows limited association with cognitive practice. Brain Cogn. 82:2 (2013), 171–180, 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.002.
116. Ritchie, S.J., Bastin, M.E., Tucker-Drob, E.M., Maniega, S.M., Engelhardt, L.E., Cox, S.R., Deary, I.J., et al. Coupled changes in brain white matter microstructure and fluid intelligence in later life. J. Neurosci. 35:22 (2015), 8672–8682, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 0862-15.2015.
117. Ritchie, S.J., Cox, S.R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M.V., Reus, L.M., Alloza, C., Liewald, D.C., Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5,216 UK Biobank participants. bioRxiv, 2017, 123729.
118. Rodgers, J.L., Lee, J., The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: a quiet methodological revolution. Am. Psychol. 65:1 (2010), 1–12, 10.1037/a0018326.
119. Rosseel, Y., Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 10:2 (2012), 1–36.
120. Rovine, M.J., Molenaar, P.C.M., A structural equations modeling approach to the general linear mixed model. New Methods for the Analysis of Change, 2001, American Psychological Association, Washington, 67–98, 10.1037/10409-003.
121. Salthouse, T.A., Why are there different age relations in cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of cognitive functioning?. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 23:4 (2014), 252–256, 10.1177/0963721414535212.
122. Satorra, A., Saris, W.E., Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika 50:1 (1985), 83–90, 10.1007/BF02294150.
123. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H., Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol. Res. 8:2 (2003), 23–74.
124. Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., Hundred days of cognitive training enhance broad cognitive abilities in adulthood: findings from the COGITO study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2:July (2010), 1–10, 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00027.
125. Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., Younger adults show long-term effects of cognitive training on broad cognitive abilities over 2 years. Dev. Psychol. 50:9 (2014), 2304–2310, 10.1037/a0037388.
126. Segalowitz, S.J., Rose-Krasnor, L., The construct of brain maturation in theories of child development. Brain Cogn. 20:1 (1992), 1–7, 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90058-T.
127. Sliwinski, M., Hoffman, L., Hofer, S.M., Evaluating convergence of within-Person change and between-person age differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies. Res. Hum. Dev. 7:1 (2010), 45–60, 10.1080/15427600903578169.
128. Snitz, B.E., Small, B.J., Wang, T., Chang, C.-C.H., Hughes, T.F., Ganguli, M., Kliegel, M., et al. Do subjective memory complaints lead or follow objective cognitive change? A five-year population study of temporal influence. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 21:9 (2015), 732–742, 10.1017/S1355617715000922.
129. Steiger, J.H., Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 42:5 (2007), 893–898, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.
130. Steinberg, L., A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev. Rev. 28:1 (2008), 78–106, 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.
131. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., Eid, M., Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. Eur. J. Personal. 13:5 (1999), 389–408, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389:AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A.
132. Stoel, R.D., Garre, F.G., Dolan, C., van den Wittenboer, G., On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. Psychol. Methods 11:4 (2006), 439–455, 10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.439.
133. Tohka, J., Zijdenbos, A., Evans, A., Fast and robust parameter estimation for statistical partial volume models in brain MRI. Neuroimage 23:1 (2004), 84–97, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.007.
134. Tomarken, A.J., Waller, N.G., Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 1 (2005), 31–65, 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.
135. Usami, S., Hayes, T., McArdle, J.J., Inferring longitudinal relationships between variables: model selection between the latent change score and autoregressive cross-lagged factor models mail: usamis@human.tsukuba.ac.jp mail: timothybhayes@gmail.com mail: jmcardle@usc.edu University of S. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J., 2016, 331–342.
136. Van Erp, S., Mulder, J., Oberski, D., Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychol. Methods, 2017, 1–67, 10.17605/OSF.IO/5J3M9.
137. Vandenberg, R.J., Lance, C.E., A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 3:1 (2000), 4–70, 10.1177/109442810031002.
138. van den Bos, W., Eppinger, B., Developing developmental cognitive neuroscience: from agenda setting to hypothesis testing. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 17 (2016), 138–144, 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.011.
139. van der Sluis, S., Verhage, M., Posthuma, D., Dolan, C.V., Phenotypic complexity, measurement bias, and poor phenotypic resolution contribute to the missing heritability problem in genetic association studies. PLoS One, 5(11), 2010, e13929, 10.1371/journal.pone.0013929.
140. van Harmelen, A.-L., Gibson, J.L., St Clair, M.C., Owens, M., Brodbeck, J., Dunn, V., Goodyer, I.M., et al. Friendships and family support reduce subsequent depressive symptoms in at-risk adolescents. PLoS One, 11(5), 2016, e0153715, 10.1371/journal.pone.0153715.
141. von Hippel, P.T., New confidence intervals and bias comparisons show that maximum likelihood can beat multiple imputation in small samples. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 23:3 (2016), 422–437, 10.1080/10705511.2015.1047931.
142. Voelkle, M.C., Oud, J.H.L., Relating latent change score and continuous time models relating latent change score and continuous time models. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 22:3 (2015), 366–381, 10.1080/10705511.2014.935918.
143. Voelkle, M.C., Latent growth curve modeling as an integrative approach to the analysis of change. Psychol. Sci. 49:4 (2007), 375–414.
144. von Oertzen, T., Brandmaier, A.M., Optimal study design with identical power: an application of power equivalence to latent growth curve models. Psychol. Aging 28:2 (2013), 414–428, 10.1037/a0031844.
145. von Oertzen, T., Brandmaier, A.M., Tsang, S., Structural equation modeling with Ωnyx. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 22:1 (2015), 148–161, 10.1080/10705511.2014.935842.
146. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Farrell, S., AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 11:1 (2004), 192–196, 10.3758/BF03206482.
147. Weiskopf, N., Suckling, J., Williams, G., Correia, M.M., Inkster, B., Tait, R., Lutti, A., et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front. Neurosci., 7, 2013, 95, 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095.
148. Wendelken, C., Ferrer, E., Ghetti, S., Bailey, S.K., Cutting, L., Bunge, S.A., Frontoparietal structural connectivity in childhood predicts development of functional connectivity and reasoning ability: a large-scale longitudinal investigation. J. Neurosci. 37:35 (2017), 8549–8558, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3726-16.2017.
149. Westfall, J., Yarkoni, T., Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS One, 11(3), 2016, e0152719, 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719.
150. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F., Summers, G.F., Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol. Methodol., 8, 1977, 84, 10.2307/270754.
151. Whitaker, K.J., Vértes, P.E., Romero-Garcia, R., Váša, F., Moutoussis, M., Prabhu, G., Villis, L., et al. Adolescence is associated with genomically patterned consolidation of the hubs of the human brain connectome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113:32 (2016), 9105–9110, 10.1073/pnas.1601745113.
152. Wicherts, J.M., Dolan, C.V., Hessen, D.J., Oosterveld, P., van Baal, G.C.M., Boomsma, D.I., Span, M.M., Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect. Intelligence 32:5 (2004), 509–537, 10.1016/j.intell.2004.07.002.
153. Wicherts, J.M., Dolan, C.V., Hessen, D.J., Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: a question of measurement invariance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89:5 (2005), 696–716, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.696.
154. Widaman, K.F., Ferrer, E., Conger, R.D., Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: measuring the same construct across time. Child Dev. Persp. 4:1 (2010), 10–18, 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x.
155. Willis, S.L., Schaie, K.W., Sternberg, R.J., Wagner, R.K., (eds.) Practical Intelligence: Nature and Origins of Competence in the Everyday World, 1986, Cambridge University Press, New York Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=-Cw7AAAAIAAJ&pgis=1.
156. Wothke, W., Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. Bollen, K.A., (eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models, 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 256–293.
157. Wothke, W., Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. Little, T.D., Schnabel, K.U., Baumert, J., (eds.) Modeling Longitudinal and Multilevel Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples, 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ, 219–240.
158. Wright, S., The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 6:6 (1920), 3200–3232 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16576506.
159. Zhang, Z., Hamagami, F., Grimm, K.J., McArdle, J.J., Using R package RAMpath for tracing SEM path diagrams and conducting complex longitudinal data analysis. Struct. Equ. Model.: Multidiscip. J. 22:1 (2015), 132–147, 10.1080/10705511.2014.935257.
160. Ziegler, G., Ridgway, G.R., Blakemore, S.-J., Ashburner, J., Penny, W., Multivariate dynamical modelling of structural change during development. Neuroimage 147 (2017), 746–762, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.017.