In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report.

Psychological Methods

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 581-596

  Bollen, Kenneth A ^a   Diamantopoulos, Adamantios ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

causal indicators; composites; formative indicators; measurement models; structural equation models

Indexed keywords

CAUSALITY; FACTOR ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CAUSALITY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84942025094     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/met0000056     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Bagozzi, R. P. (1994). Structural equation models in marketing research: Basic principles. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles of marketing research (pp. 317-385). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods, 12, 229-237. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.229
3. Bagozzi, R. P. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 261-292.
4. Bainter, S. A., & Bollen, K. A. (2014). Interpretational confounding or confounded interpretations of causal indicators Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 12, 125-140. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/15366367.2014.968503
5. Barki, H. (2008). Thar's gold in them thar constructs. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 39, 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 1390673.1390677
6. Bauldry, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2015). Tetrad: A set of tetrad commands for confirmatory tetrad analysis. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of Alabama, Binghamton, AL.
7. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children: The Binet-Simon Scale. Publications of the Training School at Vineland New Jersey Department of Research, 11 (E. S. Kite, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
8. Bisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J.-M., & Chenhall, R. (2007). Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 789-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.010
9. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1963). Correlated independent variables: The problem of multicollinearity. Social Forces, 42, 233-237. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1093/sf/42.2.233
10. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1964). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
11. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1968). The measurement problem: A gap between the languages of theory and research. In H. M. Blalock & A. B. Blalock (Eds.), Methodology in social research (pp. 5-27). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1971). Causal models involving unmeasured variables in stimulus-response situations. In H. M. Blalock, Jr. (Ed.), Causal models in the social sciences (pp. 335-347). Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.
13. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
14. Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605-634. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239
15. Bollen, K. A. (2007). Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods, 12, 219-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 1082-989X.12.2.219
16. Bollen, K. A. (2011). Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 359-372.
17. Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16, 265-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024448
18. Bollen, K. A., & Davis, W. R. (2009). Causal indicator models: Identification, estimation, and testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 498-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008253
19. Bollen, K. A., & Grandjean, B. D. (1981). The dimension(s) of democracy: Further issues in the measurement and effects of political democracy. American Sociological Review, 46, 651-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 2094946
20. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Latent variables in structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 56-67). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
22. Bollen, K. A., Lennox, R. D., & Dahly, D. L. (2009). Practical application of the vanishing tetrad test for causal indicator measurement models: An example from health-related quality of life. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1524-1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3560
23. Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K.-F. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5, 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.5 .1.3
24. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
25. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
26. Burt, R. S. (1976). Interpretational confounding of unobserved variables in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 5, 3-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004912417600500101
27. Cadogan, J. W., & Lee, N. (2013). Improper use of endogenous formative variables. Journal of Business Research, 66, 233-241. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.006
28. Cadogan, J. W., Lee, N., & Chamberlain, L. (2013). Formative variables are unreal variables: Why the formative MIMIC model is invalid. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3, 38-49.
29. Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33, 689-707.
30. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Diamantopoulos, A. (2006). The error term in formative measurement models: Interpretation and modeling implications. Journal of Modelling in Management, 1, 7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465660610667775
32. Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 335-358.
33. Diamantopoulos, A. (2013). MIMIC models and formative measurement: Some thoughts on Lee, Cadogan & Chamberlain. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3, 30-37.
34. Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203-1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
35. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
36. Diamantopoulos, A., & Temme, D. (2013). MIMIC models, formative indicators and the joys of research. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3, 160-170.
37. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38 .2.269.18845
38. Edwards, J. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 370-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1094428110378369
39. Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.155
40. Eggert, A., & Fassott, G. (2003). Zur Verwendung formativer und reflektiver Indikatoren in Strukturgleichungsmodellen: Ergebnisse einer Metaanalyse und Anwendungsempfehlungen [On the use of formative and reflective indicators in structural equation models: Results of a metaanalysis and recommendations for application]. Kaiserslauterner Schriftenreihe Marketing, 20, Kaiserslautern.
41. Fassott, G. (2006). Operationalisierung latenter Variablen in Strukturgleichungsmodellen: Eine Standortbestimmung [Operationalizing latent variables in structural equation models: A state-of-the-art review]. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche. Forschung, 58, 67-88.
42. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). A comparative analysis of two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to market data. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (pp. 289-324). New York, NY: Praeger.
43. Franke, G. R., Preacher, K. J., & Rigdon, E. E. (2008). Proportional structural effects of formative indicators. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1229-1237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.011
44. Grace, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2008). Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: The role of composite variables. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 15, 191-213. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10651-007-0047-7
45. Hardin, A., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). A commentary on the use of formative measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 753-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164411414270
46. Hardin, A. M., Chang, J. C.-J., & Fuller, M. A. (2008). Formative vs. reflective measurement: Comment on Marakas, Johnson, and Clay (2007). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 519-534. Retrieved from http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/met-fac-articles/6
47. Hardin, A. M., Chang, J. C.-J., Fuller, M. A., & Torkzadeh, G. (2011). Formative measurement and academic research: In search of measurement theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 281-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164410370208
48. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University Press of Chicago.
49. Heise, D. R. (1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 1, 147-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004912417200100201
50. Hipp, J., Bauer, D. J., & Bollen, K. A. (2005). Conducting tetrad tests of model fit and contrasts of tetrad-nested models: A new SAS macro. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 76-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ s15328007sem1201-4
51. Howell, R. D. (2013). Conceptual clarity in measurement-Constructs, composites, and causes: A commentary on Lee, Cagogan and Chamberlain. AMS Review, 3, 18-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13162-013-0036-y
52. Howell, R. D. (2014). What is the latent variable in causal indicator models Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 12, 141-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2014.980105
53. Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2007a). Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, 12, 205-218. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.205
54. Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2007b). Is formative measurement really measurement Reply to Bollen (2007) and Bagozzi (2007). Psychological Methods, 12, 238-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 1082-989X.12.2.238
55. Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2013). Formative measurement: A critical perspective. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 44, 44-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2544415.2544418
56. Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
57. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376806
58. Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10, 631-639.
59. Kim, G., Shin, B., & Grover, V. (2010). Investigating two contradictory views of formative measurement in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34, 345-365.
60. Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (1987). Some further remarks on measurement-structure interaction and the unidimensionality of constructs. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 438-444. http://dx .doi.org/10.2307/3151393
61. Lee, N., & Cadogan, J. W. (2013). Problems with formative and higher order reflective variables. Journal of Business Research, 66, 242-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.004
62. Lee, N., Cadogan, J. W., & Chamberlain, L. (2013). The MIMIC model and formative variables: Problems and solutions. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3, 3-17.
63. Lee, N., Cadogan, J. W., & Chamberlain, L. (2014). Material and efficient cause interpretations of the formative model: Resolving misunderstandings and clarifying conceptual language. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 4, 32-43.
64. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
65. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 1082-989X.1.2.130
66. MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 323-326. http://dx .doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003011
67. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710
68. Markus, K. A. (2014). Unfished business in clarifying causal measurement: Commentary on Bainter and Bollen. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 12, 146-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 15366367.2014.980106
69. Markus, K. A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory: Measurement, causation, and meaning. New York, NY: Routledge.
70. McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1981.tb00621.x
71. Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 361-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428104268027
72. Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781439800393
73. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. London, UK: Sage.
74. Petter, S., Rai, A., & Straub, D. (2012). The critical importance of construct measurement specification: A response to Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36, 147-155.
75. Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31, 623-656.
76. Podsakoff, N. P., Shen, W., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2006). The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique, and implications for future research. In D. J. Ketchen & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 3, pp. 197-252). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1479-8387(06)03008-6
77. Rigdon, E. W. (2013). Lee, Cadogan, and Chamberlain: An excellent point but what about that iceberg AMS Review, 3, 24-29. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s13162-013-0034-0
78. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00097-6
79. Rossiter, J. R. (2008). Content validity of measures of abstract constructs in management and organizational research. British Journal of Management, 19, 380-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00587.x
80. Roy, S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Marsillac, E. (2012). The effect of misspecification of reflective and formative constructs in operations and manufacturing management research. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10, 34-52.
81. Spearman, C. (1904). "General Intelligence," objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-292. http://dx .doi.org/10.2307/1412107
82. Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412986038
83. Steyer, R., Mayer, A., Geiser, C., & Cole, D. A. (2015). A theory of states and traits-Revised. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 71-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719
84. Treiblmaier, H., Bentler, P. M., & Mair, P. (2011). Formative constructs implemented via common factors. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.532693
85. Wang, J., Engelhard, G., Jr., & Lu, Z. (2014). Clarifying the conceptualization of indicators within different models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 12, 155-159. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/15366367.2014.981124
86. Widaman, K. F. (2014). Much ado about nothing-or at best, very little. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 12, 165-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2014.980109
87. Wilcox, J. B., Howell, R. D., & Breivik, E. (2008). Questions about formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1219-1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.010