메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1-5

Laser-induced electronic desorption of Si atoms from (formula presented)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85038318572     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.125320     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (2)

References (27)
  • 2
    • 85038326800 scopus 로고
    • Proceedings of the First International Conference on Photo-excited Processes and Applications, edited by Y. Murata, M. Hanabusa, H. Matsunami, and K. Takahashi (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • Proceedings of the First International Conference on Photo-excited Processes and Applications, edited by Y. Murata, M. Hanabusa, H. Matsunami, and K. Takahashi (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1994).
    • (1994)
  • 12
    • 11644283926 scopus 로고
    • K. TakayanagiY. TanishiroM. TakahasgiS. TakahashiSurf. Sci. 164, 367 (1985).
    • (1985) Surf. Sci. , vol.164 , pp. 367
    • Takayanagi, K.1
  • 14
  • 23
    • 0001102902 scopus 로고
    • edited by W. Kaiser, of Topics in Applied Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin
    • D. von der Linde, in Ultrashort Laser Pulses, edited by W. Kaiser, Vol. 60 of Topics in Applied Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988), p. 113.
    • (1988) Ultrashort Laser Pulses , vol.60 , pp. 113
    • Von der Linde, D.1
  • 24
    • 85038323105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • private communication
    • H. Sumi (private communication).
    • Sumi, H.1
  • 25
    • 85038270280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Careful numerical examination has shown that the magnitudes of (formula presented)‘s in Eq. (7) depend on (formula presented) However, the dependence of (formula presented) is weak enough comparing with that of (formula presented) for the change in (formula presented) from 2 to 3.5, (formula presented) changes by a factor of 25, whereas (formula presented) changes only by a factor of 1.5. Therefore, weak dependence of (formula presented) can be ignored
    • Careful numerical examination has shown that the magnitudes of (formula presented)‘s in Eq. (7) depend on (formula presented) However, the dependence of (formula presented) is weak enough comparing with that of (formula presented) for the change in (formula presented) from 2 to 3.5, (formula presented) changes by a factor of 25, whereas (formula presented) changes only by a factor of 1.5. Therefore, weak dependence of (formula presented) can be ignored.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.