When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring

American Sociological Review

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1111-1138

  Rivera, Lauren A ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

employment; gender; higher education; inequalities; qualitative methods; work and occupations

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; GENDER DISPARITY; GENDER ISSUE; HIGHER EDUCATION; LABOR MARKET; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 85033800731     PISSN: 00031224     EISSN: 19398271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0003122417739294     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Acker Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4(2):139–58.
2. Aguirre Adalberto, Jr. 2000. Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. American Association of University Professors. 2015. “Busting the Myths: The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession 2014–15.” Academe March/April:4–19.
4. Anderson Deborah J., Binder Melissa, Krause Kate. 2002. “The Motherhood Wage Penalty: Which Mothers Pay It and Why?” American Economic Review 92(2):354–58.
5. Astin Helen S., Milem Jeffrey F., 1997. “The Status of Academic Couples in U.S. Institutions.” Pp. 128–55 in Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, edited by Ferber M. A., Loeb J. W., Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6. Bailyn Lotte. 2003. “Academic Careers and Gender Equity: Lessons Learned from MIT.” Gender, Work and Organization 10(2):137–53.
7. Barbezat Debra A., Hughes James H., 2006. “Salary Structure Effects and the Gender Pay Gap in Academia.” Research in Higher Education 46(6):621–40.
8. Berger Joseph, Fişek M. Hamit, Norman Robert Z., Zelditch Morris, Jr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
9. Biernat Monica, Fuegen Kathleen. 2001. “Shifting Standards and the Evaluation of Competence: Complexity in Gender-Based Judgment and Decision Making.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4):707–724.
10. Biernat Monica, Kobrynowicz Diane. 1997. “Gender- and Race-Based Standards of Competence: Lower Minimum Standards but Higher Ability Standards for Devalued Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(2):544–57.
11. Blair-Loy Mary. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Budig Michelle J., England Paula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review 66(2):204–225.
13. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2016. American Time Use Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.
14. Castilla Emilio J., 2008. “Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers.” American Journal of Sociology 113(6):1479–1526.
15. Castilla Emilio J., Benard Stephen. 2010. “The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55:543–76.
16. Cech Erin, Blair-Loy Mary, Rogers Laura. Forthcoming. “Recognizing Chilliness: How Schemas of Inequality Shape Views of Culture and Climate in Work Environments.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology.
17. Ceci Stephen J., Williams Wendy M., 2011. “Understanding Current Causes of Women’s Underrepresentation in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(8):3157–62.
18. Charmaz Kathy. 2001. “Grounded Theory.” Pp. 335–52 in Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by Emerson R., Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
19. Correll Shelley J., Benard Stephen, Paik In. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” American Journal of Sociology 112(5):1297–1339.
20. Cuddy Amy J. C., Fiske Susan T., Glick Peter. 2008. “Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the Bias Map.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40:61–149.
21. DePaulo Bella M., Morris Wendy L., 2006. “The Unrecognized Stereotyping and Discrimination against Singles.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(5):251–54.
22. Dovidio John F., Gaertner Samuel. 2000. “Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions: 1989 and 1999.” Psychological Science 11(4):315–19.
23. Eagly Alice H., Carli Linda L., 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
24. Eagly Alice H., Karau Steven J., 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3):573–98.
25. Ecklund Elaine Howard, Lincoln Anne E., 2016. Failing Families, Failing Science: Work-Family Conflict in Academic Science. New York: NYU Press.
26. Eckstein Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” Pp. 79–137 in Handbook of Political Science, edited by Greenstein I., Polsby N. W., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. Ellemers Naomi, van den Heuvel Henriette, de Gilder Dick, Maass Anne, Bonvini Alessandra. 2004. “The Underrepresentation of Women in Science: Differential Commitment or the Queen Bee Syndrome?” British Journal of Social Psychology 43(3):315–38.
28. Ely Robin J., Stone Pamela, Ammerman Colleen. 2014. “Rethink What You ‘Know’ about High-Achieving Women.” Harvard Business Review 92(12):101–109.
29. Finkelstein Martin J., 1984. “The Status of Academic Women: An Assessment of Five Competing Explanations.” Review of Higher Education 7(3):223–46.
30. Fiske Susan T., Cuddy Amy J. C., Glick Peter, Xu Jun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6):878–92.
31. Foschi Martha, Lai Larissa, Sigerson Kirsten. 1994. “Gender and Double Standards in the Assessment of Job Applicants.” Social Psychology Quarterly 54(4):326–39.
32. Fox Mary Frank. 2005. “Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists.” Social Studies of Science 35(1):131–50.
33. Glaser Barney G., Strauss Anselm L., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
34. Halpert Jane A., Wilson Midge L., Hickman Julia L., 1993. “Pregnancy as a Source of Bias in Performance Appraisals.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 14(7):649–63.
35. Heilman Madeline E., 2001. “Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women’s Ascent up the Organizational Ladder.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4):657–74.
36. Ibarra Herminia, Ely Robin J., Kolb Deborah M., 2013. “Women Rising: The Unseen Barriers.” Harvard Business Review 91(9):60–66.
37. Jacobs Jerry A., 2004. “The Faculty Time Divide.” Sociological Forum 9(1):3–27.
38. Jacobs Jerry A, Winslow Sarah E., 2004. “Overworked Faculty: Jobs, Stresses, and Family Divides.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596:104–129.
39. Kahneman Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
40. Kalev Alexandra, Dobbin Frank, Kelly Erin. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Diversity Management and the Remediation of Inequality.” American Sociological Review 71(4):589–617.
41. Kanter Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
42. Khurana Rakesh. 2002. Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Killewald Alexandra. 2013. “A Reconsideration of the Fatherhood Premium: Marriage, Residence, Biology, and the Wages of Fathers.” American Sociological Review 78(1):96–116.
44. Killewald Alexandra, Gough Margaret. 2013. “Does Specialization Explain Marriage and Parenthood Penalties and Premiums?” American Sociological Review 78(3):477–502.
45. Lamont Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Lofland John, Lofland Lyn H., 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
47. Madera Juan M., Hebl Michelle R., Martin Randi C., 2009. “Gender and Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Agentic and Communal Differences.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94(6):1591–99.
48. Mason Mary Ann, Goulden Marc. 2004. “Marriage and Baby Blues: Redefining Gender Equity in the Academy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596:86–103.
49. Mason Mary Ann, Goulden Marc, Frasch Karie. 2009. “Why Graduate Students Reject the Fast Track.” Academe 95(1):11–16.
50. Mason Mary Ann, Stacy Angelica, Goulden Marc, Hoffman Carol, Frasch Karie. 2005. University of California Faculty Family Friendly Edge: An Initiative for Tenure-Track Faculty at the University of California. Berkeley: University of California. Retrieved October 2, 2017 (https://ucfamilyedge.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/ucfamilyedge.pdf).
51. Miles Matthew B., Huberman A. Michael. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Moss-Racusin Corinne A., Dovidio John F., Brescoll Victoria L., Graham Mark J., Handelsman Jo. 2012. “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(41):16474–79.
53. National Public Radio. 2017. “Speed Dating for Economists.” Audio blog post, Planet Money.
54. National Science Board. 2012. “Science and Engineering Indicators.” Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved April 4, 2016 (http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c0/c0i.htm).
55. Neckerman Kathryn M., Kirschenman Joleen. 1991. “Hiring Strategies, Racial Bias, and Inner City Workers.” Social Problems 38(4):433–47.
56. Niederle Muriel, Roth Alvin. 2009. “The Effects of a Central Clearinghouse on Job Placement, Wages, and Hiring Practices.” Pp. 273–306 in Studies in Labor Market Intermediation, edited by Autor D. H., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Pager Devah, Quillian Lincoln. 2005. “Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do.” American Sociological Review 70(3):355–80.
58. Perna Laura W., 2006. “Sex Differences in Faculty Tenure and Promotion: The Contribution of Family Ties.” Research in Higher Education 46(3):277–30.
59. Petersen Trond, Penner Andrew M., Høgsnes Geir. 2014. “From Motherhood Penalties to Husband Premia: The New Challenge for Gender Equality and Family Policy, Lessons from Norway.” American Journal of Sociology 119(5):1434–72.
60. Pew Charitable Trusts. 2015. Raising Kids and Running a Household: How Working Parents Share the Load. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
61. Posselt Julie R., 2016. Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Potucheck Jean L., 1997. Who Supports the Family? Gender and Breadwinning in Dual-Earner Marriages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63. Reskin Barbara E., McBrier Debra Branch. 2000. “Why Not Ascription? Organizations’ Employment of Male and Female Managers.” American Sociological Review 65(2):210–33.
64. Ridgeway Cecilia L., 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
65. Ridgeway Cecilia L., Correll Shelley J., 2004. “Motherhood as a Status Characteristic.” Journal of Social Issues 60(4):683–700.
66. Rivera Lauren A., 2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.” American Sociological Review 77(6):999–1022.
67. Rivera Lauren A., 2015. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68. Rodgers William M., Stratton Leslie S., 2010. “Male Marital Wage Differentials: Training, Personal Characteristics, and Fixed Effects.” Economic Inquiry 48(3):722–42.
69. Rudd Elizabeth, Morrison Emory, Sadrozinski Renate, Nerad Maresi, Cerny Joseph. 2008. “Equality and Illusion: Gender and Tenure in Art History Careers.” Journal of Marriage and Family 70(1):228–38.
70. Rudman Laurie A., 1998. “Self-Promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counterstereotypical Impression Management.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(3):629–45.
71. Samble Jennifer N., 2008. “Female Faculty: Challenges and Choices in the United States and Beyond.” New Directions in Higher Education 143:55–62.
72. Schiebinger Londa L., Henderson Andrea Davies, Gilmartin Shannon K., 2008. Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Stanford, CA: Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University.
73. Schmader Toni, Whitehead Jessica, Wysocki Vicki H., 2007. “A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants.” Sex Roles 57(7–8):509–514.
74. Schwartz Christine R., Mare Robert D., 2005. “Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage from 1940 to 2003.” Demography 42(4):621–46.
75. Small Mario L., 2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’ On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field Based Research.” Ethnography 10(1):5–38.
76. Spence A. Michael. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Steinpreis Rhea E., Anders Katie A., Ritzke Dawn. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41(7–8):509–528.
78. Stephens Nicole M., Levine Cynthia S., 2011. “Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality.” Psychological Science 22(10):1231–36.
79. Stevens Mitchell L., 2007. Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Stone Pamela. 2007. Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
81. Thébaud Sarah, Taylor Catherine. 2015. “‘The Women Always Fail Thing’: The Specter of Motherhood in the Careers of Young Scientists and Engineers.” Working paper, University of California-Santa Barbara and Indiana University.
82. Trix Frances, Psenka Carolyn. 2003. “Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty.” Discourse & Society 14(2):191–220.
83. Turco Catherine J., 2010. “Cultural Foundations of Tokenism: Evidence from the Leveraged Buyout Industry.” American Sociological Review 75(6):894–913.
84. Uhlmann Eric Luis, Cohen Geoffrey L., 2005. “Constructed Criteria Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination.” Psychological Science 16(6):475–80
85. Van Anders Sari M., 2004. “Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive Barriers to Becoming Professors.” Sex Roles 51(9–10):511–21.
86. Wennerås Christine, Wold Agnes. 1997. “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review.” Nature 387:341–43.
87. Williams Joan C., 2001. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Williams Joan C., 2005. “The Glass Ceiling and the Maternal Wall in Academia.” New Directions for Higher Education 130:91–10.
89. Williams Joan C., Smith Jessi L., 2015. “The Myth that Academic Science Isn’t Biased Against Women.” Chronicle of Higher Education, July 8.
90. Williams Wendy M., Ceci Stephen J., 2015. “National Hiring Experiments Reveal 2-to-1 Preference for Women on STEM Tenure Track.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(17):5360–65.
91. Wilson Robin. 2002. “Academic Couples Said to Be Happier Working at Same University.” Chronicle of Higher Education, August 2.
92. Wolf-Wendel Lisa B., Twombly Susan, Rice Suzanne. 2003. The Two-Body Problem: Dual-Career-Couple Hiring Practices in Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
93. Yin Robert K., 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.