Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 707-724

  Biernat, M ^a   Fuegen, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GENDER RELATIONS; WOMENS STATUS;

EID: 0035206066     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00237     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gender, status, and behavior in task situations
2. All that you can be: Stereotyping of self and others in a military context
3. Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups
4. Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments
5. Stereotypes and standards of judgment
6. Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns
7. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal
8. When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals
9. Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis
10. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis
11. Fuzzy sets and double standards: Modeling the process of ability inference
12. Can gender inequalities be eliminated?
13. Status characteristics, standards, and attributions
14. Gender and double standards for competence
15. Double standards for competence: Theory and research
16. Standards, performancese, and the formation of self-other expectations
17. Sex bias in hiring: Effects of job demands and applicant competence
18. Are some women prejudiced against women?
19. Discrimination against competent women
20. Sex-determined attributions
21. The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations
22. Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons
23. Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory
24. Decoding subjective evaluations: How stereotypes provide shifting standards
25. Accounting for the effects of accountability
26. Sex and contextual differences in the appropriateness of assertive behavior
27. Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers
28. Male chauvinism and source competence: A research note
29. Neutralizing sexism in mixed sex groups: Do women have to be better than men?
30. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management
31. Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross-cultural look
32. Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon?
33. Empirically derived conceptions of femaleness and maleness: A current view
34. Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization
35. The Queen Bee syndrome
36. Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
37. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model