Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 2: Product design, operation and thermophysical characterisation

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 93, Issue , 2018, Pages 4-13

  Eaton, Dan ^a   Jakaj, Blerta ^a   Forster, Mark ^a   Nicol, James ^a   Mavropoulou, Eleni ^a   Scott, Kenneth ^a   Liu, Chuan ^a   McAdam, Kevin ^a   Murphy, James ^a   Proctor, Christopher J ^a  

^a BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Combustion; Next generation products; Preclinical assessment; Thermophysical assessment; THP1.0; Tobacco heating product

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; CIGARETTE SMOKE; NITRIC OXIDE; NITROGEN;

AEROSOL; ARTICLE; COMBUSTION; DECOMPOSITION; DISTILLATION; EVAPORATION; HEAT TRANSFER; HEATING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROLYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; TOBACCO; ANALYSIS; DEVICES; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION;

ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEATING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 85033448842     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. American Society for Quality (ASQ), Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2017 http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/process-analysis-tools/overview/fmea.html (accessed February 10, 2017).
2. Baker, R.R., The kinetics of tobacco pyrolysis. Thermochim. Acta 17 (1976), 29–63.
3. Baker, R.R., A review of pyrolysis studies to unravel reaction steps in burning tobacco. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 11 (1987), 555–573.
4. Baker, R.R., Smoke chemistry. Layten Davis, D., Nielsen, M.T., (eds.) Tobacco Production, Chemistry and Technology, 1999, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 398–439.
5. Baker, R.R., Smoke generation inside a burning cigarette: modifying combustion to develop cigarettes that may be less hazardous to health. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32:4 (2006), 373–385.
6. Banyasz, J.L., The thermodynamics of tobacco–water interactions. Beitr. Tab. Int. 18 (1999), 189–203.
7. Barontini, F., Tugnoli, A., Cozzani, V., Tetteh, J., Jarriault, M., Zinovik, I., Volatile products formed in the thermal decomposition of a tobacco substrate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013), 14984–14997.
8. Barontini, F., Rocchi, M., Tugnoli, A., Cozzani, V., Tetteh, J., Jarriault, M., Zinovik, I., Quantitative analysis of evolved gas in the thermal decomposition of a tobacco substrate. Chem. Eng. Trans. 32 (2013), 703–708.
9. BIBRA, TRACE – Unique Chemical Toxicity Database. 2017 https://www.bibra-information.co.uk/trace-unique-chemical-database/ (accessed February 10, 2017).
10. Burns, D.M., Dybing, E., Gray, N., Hecht, S., Anderson, C., Sanner, T., O'Connor, R., Djordjevic, M., Dresler, C., Hainaut, P., Jarvis, M., Opperhuizen, A., Straif, K., Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal. Tob. Control 17 (2008), 132–141.
11. Burton, H.R., Childs, G. Jr., The thermal degradation of tobacco: VI. influence of extraction on the formation of some major gas phase constituents. Beitr. Tab. Int. 8:4 (1975), 174–180.
12. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS), RTECS Search. 2017 http://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/rtecs/search.html (accessed February 10, 2017).
13. Costigan, S., Meredith, C., An approach to ingredient screening and toxicological risk assessment of flavours in e-liquids. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 72 (2015), 361–369.
14. st Int. Symposium on Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, Nancy, France, 9–12 May 2016, 2016 https://www.pmiscience.com/es/node/2241 (accessed October 24, 2016).
15. Czégény, Z., Blazso, M., Várhegyi, G., Jakab, E., Liu, C., Nappi, L., Formation of selected toxicants from tobacco under different pyrolysis conditions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol 79 (2009), 278–288.
16. European Commission (EC), Flavouring Substances. 2017 http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/flavouring/database/dsp_search.cfm (accessed February 10, 2017).
17. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Information on Chemicals. 2017 http://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals (accessed February 10, 2017).
18. Farsalinos, K.E., Le Houezec, J., Regulation in the face of uncertainty: the evidence on electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes). Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 8 (2015), 157–167.
19. Food and Drug Administration, Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke; Established List, April 2012. 2012 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM297981.pdf (accessed October 24, 2016).
20. Food and Drug Administration, Everything Added to Food in the United States (EAFUS). 2017 http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/fcnNavigation.cfm?rpt=eafusListing (accessed February 10, 2017).
21. Forster, M., Liu, C., Duke, M.G., McAdam, K.G., Proctor, C.J., An experimental method to study emissions from heated tobacco between 100 to 200°C. Chem. Cent. J., 9, 2015, 20.
22. Forster, M., Mariner, D., Wright, C., Fiebelkorn, S., Yurteri, C., Liu, C., McAdam, K.G., Proctor, C.J., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 3: comprehensive chemical characterisation - harmful and potentially harmful aerosol emissions. Reg. Tox. Pharm., 2017.
23. Fowles, J., Dybing, E., Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob. Control 12:4 (2003), 424–430.
24. Gardner, D.E., A safer cigarette? a comparative study. a consensus report, eclipse expert panel. Inhal. Toxicol. 12:Suppl. 5 (2000), 1–58.
25. Health Canada, Health Canada Method T-115, Determination of “tar” Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke. 1999 http://edge.rit.edu/edge/P10056/public/Health%20Canada%20Nicotine (accessed October 24, 2016).
26. Hoffmann, D., Hoffmann, I., The changing cigarette, 1950-1995. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 50:4 (1997), 307–364.
27. Hoffmann, D., Hoffmann, I., Letters to the editor, tobacco smoke components. Beitr. Tab. Int. 18 (1998), 49–52.
28. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), Quality Risk Assessment. Q9. 2005 http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/q9-briefing-pack/briefing-pack.html (accessed February 10, 2017).
29. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), INCHEM Chemical Safety Information from Intergovernmental Organization. 2017 http://www.inchem.org/ (accessed February 10, 2017).
30. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Tobacco and Tobacco Products —Atmosphere for Conditioning and Testing. ISO 3402:1999. ISO: Geneva. 1999.
31. Lee, S., Fasina, O., TG-FTIR analysis of switchgrass pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol 86 (2009), 39–43.
32. Lipowicz, P.J., Seeman, J.I., A model to estimate the sources of tobacco specific nitrosamines in cigarette smoke. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2017, 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00046 Accepted Manuscript. Publication Date (Web): 27 Jun 2017.
33. Liu, C., Woodcock, D., Observing the peripheral burning of cigarettes by an infrared technique. Beitr. Tab. Int. 20:4 (2014), 257–264.
34. Liu, Q., Wang, S., Zheng, Y., Luo, Z., Cen, K., Mechanism study of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG-FTIR analysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 82 (2008), 170–177.
35. Liu, B., Li, Y.M., Wu, S.B., Li, W.H., Deng, S.S., Xia, Z.L., Pyrolysis characteristic of tobacco stem studied by py-GC/MS, TG-FTIR and TG-MS. BioResources 8 (2013), 220–230.
36. McAdam, K.G., Gregg, E.O., Bevan, M., Dittrich, D.J., Hemsley, S., Liu, C., Proctor, C.J., Design and chemical evaluation of reduced machine-yield cigarettes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 62:1 (2012), 138–150.
37. Moennikes, O., Vanscheeuwijck, P.M., Friedrichs, B., Anskeit, E., Patskan, G.J., Reduced toxicological activity of cigarette smoke by the addition of ammonia magnesium phosphate to the paper of an electrically heated cigarette: subchronic inhalation toxicology. Inhal. Toxicol. 20 (2008), 647–663.
38. Moldoveanu, S.C., Borgerding, M., Formation of tobacco specific nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke; Part 1, FTC smoking. Beitr. Tab. Int. 23:1 (2014), 19–31.
39. Moldoveanu, S.C., St Charles, F.K., Differences in the chemical composition of the particulate phase of inhaled and exhaled cigarette mainstream smoke. Beitr. Tab. Int. 22:4 (2014), 290–302.
40. US National Library of Medicine (NLM), TOXNET Toxicological Data Network. 2017 http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/index.html (accessed February 10, 2017).
41. US National Library of Medicine (NLM), ChemIDplus. 2017 http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/chemidheavy.jsp (accessed February 10, 2017).
42. Nordlund, M., Kuczaj, A.K., Modeling aerosol formation in an electrically heated tobacco product. Int. J. Chem. Mol. Nucl. Mater. Metal. Eng. 10 (2016), 334–346.
43. Norman, A., Cigarette design and materials. Davis, D.L., Nielsen, M.T., (eds.) Tobacco Production, Chemistry and Technology, 1999, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
44. Organisation for Economic and Cooperation and Development (OECD), eChemPortal – the Global Portal to Information on Chemical Substances. 2017 http://www.echemportal.org/echemportal/index?pageID=0&request_locale=en (accessed February 10, 2017).
45. Oja, V., Hajaligol, M.R., Waymack, B.E., The vaporization of semi-volatile compounds during tobacco pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol 76 (2006), 117–123.
46. Patskan, G., Reininghaus, W., Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 1: overview of technical concepts and summary of findings. J. Appl. Toxicol. 23:5 (2003), 323–328.
47. Perfetti, T.A., Norman, A.B., Gordon, B.M., Coleman, W.M. III, Morgan, W.T., Dull, G.M., Miller, C.W., The transfer of nicotine from nicotine salts to mainstream smoke. Beitr. Tab. Int. 19:3 (2014), 141–158.
48. Piadé J.-J., Wajrock, S., Jaccard, G., Janeke, G., Formation of mainstream cigarette smoke constituents prioritized by the World Health Organization – yield patterns observed in market surveys, clustering and inverse correlations. Food Chem. Toxicol. 55 (2013), 329–347.
49. RJ Reynolds Company, Chemical and Biological Studies on New Cigarette Prototypes that Heat Instead of Burn Tobacco. 1988, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
50. Rodgman, A., Green, C.R., Toxic chemicals in cigarette mainstream smoke - hazard and hoopla. Beitr. Tab. Int. 20:8 (2014), 481–545.
51. Rodgman, A., Perfetti, T.A., The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. second ed., 2013, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
52. Roemer, E., Schramke, H., Weiler, H., Buettner, A., Kausche, S., Weber, S., Berges, A., Stueber, M., Muench, M., Trelles-Sticken, E., Pype, J., Kohlgrueber, K., Voelkel, H., Wittke, S., Mainstream smoke chemistry and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of the reference cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Beitr. Tab. Int. 25 (2012), 316–335.
53. Roemer, E., Schorp, M.K., Piadé J.-J., Seeman, J.I., Leyden, D.E., Haussmann, H.-J., Scientific assessment of the use of sugars as cigarette tobacco ingredients: a review of published and other publicly available studies. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 42:3 (2012), 244–278.
54. Rostami, A.A., Murthy, J., Hajaligol, M., Modeling of a smouldering cigarette. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 66:1 (2003), 281–301.
55. SCCS, SCHER, SCENIHR, Opinion on Use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) Approach for Human Safety Assessment of Chemical Substances with Focus on Cosmetics and Consumer Products. The SCCS/SCHER/SCENIHR adopted this opinion by written procedure on 8 June 2012 after public consultation, 2012 http://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_092.pdf (accessed February 10, 2017).
56. Schaller, J.P., Keller, D., Poget, L., Pratte, P., Kaelin, E., McHugh, D., Cudazzo, G., Smart, D., Tricker, A.R., Gautier, L., Yerly, M., Reis Pires, R., Le Bouhellec, S., Ghosh, D., Hofer, I., Garcia, E., Vanscheeuwijck, P., Maeder, S., Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 2: chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81 (2016), S27–S47.
57. Schorp, M.K., Tricker, A.R., Dempsey, R., Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 1: non-clinical and clinical insights. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2012), S1–S10.
58. Smith, M.R., Clark, B., Lüdicke, F., Schaller, J.-P., Vanscheeuwijck, P., Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M.C., Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 1: description of the system and the scientific assessment program. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81 (2016), S17–S26.
59. SRC, TSCATS Database. 2017 http://www.srcinc.com/what-we-do/databaseforms.aspx?id=384 (accessed February 10, 2017).
60. St Charles, F.K., Moldoveanu, S.C., The activity and enthalpy of vaporization of nicotine from tobacco at moderate temperature. Beitr. Tab. Int. 27 (2016), 11–19.
61. Stabbert, R., Voncken, P., Rustemeier, K., Haussmann, H.J., Roemer, E., Schaffernicht, H., Patskan, G., Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 2: chemical composition of mainstream smoke. J. Appl. Toxicol. 23:5 (2003), 329–339.
62. Torikai, K., Yoshida, S., Takahashi, H., Effects of temperature, atmosphere and pH on the generation of smoke compounds during tobacco pyrolysis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (2004), 1409–1417.
63. University of Kentucky Tobacco Research & Development Center, 3R4F Preliminary Analysis. 2015 https://ctrp.uky.edu/resources/pdf/webdocs/3R4F%20Preliminary%20Analysis.pdf (accessed October 24, 2016).
64. US Department of Health and Human Services, The Health Consequences of Smoking 50 Years of Progress: a Report of the Surgeon General, 2014. Atlanta, USA., 2014 http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/index.html (accessed October 24, 2016).
65. Várhegyi, G., Czégény, Z., Liu, C., McAdam, K., Thermogravimetric analysis of tobacco combustion assuming DAEM devolatilization and empirical char-burnoff kinetics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010), 1591–1599.
66. Wang, S., Wang, K., Liu, Q., Gu, Y., Luo, Z., Cen, K., Fransson, T., Comparison of the pyrolysis behavior of lignins from different tree species. Biotechnol. Adv. 27:5 (2009), 562–567.
67. White, J.L., Conner, B.T., Perfetti, T.A., Bombick, B.R., Avlos, J.T., Fowler, K.W., Smith, C.J., Doolittle, D.J., Effect of pyrolysis temperature on the mutagenicity of tobacco smoke condensate. Food Chem. Toxicol. 39:5 (2001), 499–505.
68. Wójtowicz, M.A., Bassilakis, R., Smith, W.W., Chen, Y., Carangelo, R.M., Modeling the evolution of volatile species during tobacco pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 66 (2003), 235–261.
69. Yan, H., Fujita, O., Verification of the absence of combustion in an electrically heated tobacco system. Conference Guide and Abstracts, 21st International Symposium on Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2016, 98.
70. Yang, H.P., Yan, R., Chen, H.P., Zheng, C.G., Lee, D.H., Liang, D.T., In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Energy Fuel 20 (2006), 388–393.
71. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D.H., Zheng, C., Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86 (2007), 1781–1788.
72. Zenzen, V., Diekmann, J., Gerstenberg, B., Weber, S., Wittke, S., Schorp, M.K., Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 2: smoke chemistry and in vitro toxicological evaluation using smoking regimes reflecting human puffing behaviour. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2012), S11–S14.