Digital pictures, videos, and beyond: Knowledge acquisition with realistic images

The Psychology of Digital Learning: Constructing, Exchanging, and Acquiring Knowledge with Digital Media

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 41-59

  Schwan, Stephan ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Authenticity; Event cognition; Realistic pictures; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033351203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49077-9_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review Psychology, 63, 1-29.
2. Dutz, S., & Schwan, S. (2014). New media use in art exhibitions: Enriching or annoying? Paper presented at the 27th Annual Visitor Studies Association Conference, Albuquerque, USA.
3. Dwyer, F. M. (1968). Effect of varying amount of realistic detail in visual illustrations designed to complement programmed instruction. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 27, 351-354.
4. Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2015). Picture or text first? Explaining sequence effects when learning with pictures and text. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 153-180.
5. Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K., & Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1126-1141.
6. Fischer, S., & Schwan, S. (2010). Comprehending animations. Effects of spatial cueing versus temporal scaling. Learning and Instruction, 20, 465-475.
7. Garsoffky, B., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2007). Changing viewpoints during dynamic events. Perception, 36, 366-374.
8. Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S., & Hesse, F. W. (2002). Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1035-1050.
9. Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S., & Huff, M. (2009). Canonical views of dynamic scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 17-27.
10. Gerjets, P. (2017). Learning and Problem Solving with Hypermedia in the 21st Century: From Hypertext to Multiple Web Sources and Multimodal Adaptivity.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Glaser, M., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2009). Narrative-based learning: possible benefits and problems. The European Journal of Communication Research, 34, 429-447.
13. Glaser, M., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2012). What do we learn from docutainment? Processing hybrid television documentaries. Learning and Instruction, 22, 37-46.
14. Glaser, M., & Schwan, S. (2015). Explaining pictures: How verbal cues influence processing of pictorial learning material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1006-1018.
15. Hampp, C., & Schwan, S. (2014). Perception and evaluation of authentic objects: Findings from a visitor study. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29, 349-367.
16. Hampp, C., & Schwan, S. (2015). The role of authentic objects in museums of the history of science and technology: Findings from a visitor study. International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 5, 161-181.
17. Hard, B. M., Lozano, S. C., & Tversky, B. (2006). Hierarchical encoding of behavior: Translating perception into action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 588-608.
18. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325-360.
19. Hobbs, R. (2006). Non-optimal uses of video in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 31, 35-50.
20. Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance. The American Journal of Psychology, 75, 624-628.
21. Hudson, W. (1967). The study of the problem of pictorial perception among unacculturated groups. International Journal of Psychology, 2, 89-107.
22. Huff, M., Bauhoff, V., & Schwan, S. (2012). Effects of split attention revisited: A new display technology for troubleshooting tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1254-1261.
23. Huff, M., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2009). Tracking multiple objects across abrupt viewpoint changes. Visual Cognition, 17, 297-306.
24. Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2008). Verbalizing events: Overshadowing or facilitation? Memory & Cognition, 36, 392-402.
25. Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2012a). Do not cross the line: Heuristic spatial updating in dynamic scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1065-1072.
26. Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2012b). The verbal facilitation effect in learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 22, 376-385.
27. Ildirar, S., & Schwan, S. (2015). First-time viewers' comprehension of films: Bridging shot transitions. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 133-151.
28. Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach (2013). Digitale Medien im Unterricht (Digital media in the classroom). Retrieved from http://www.ifd-allensbach.de/uploads/tx_studies/Digitale_ Medien_2013.pdf
29. Lee, V. R. (2010). Adaptations and continuities in the use and design of visual representations in US Middle School science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1099-1126.
30. Lowe, R., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Animation principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 513-546). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31. Mager, U. I., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based environments. Learning and Instruction, 29, 141-152.
32. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Merkt, M., & Schwan, S. (2014). Training the use of interactive videos: Effects on mastering different tasks. Instructional Science, 42, 421-441.
34. Merkt, M., & Sochatzy, F. (2015). Becoming aware of cinematic techniques in propaganda: Instructional support by cueing and training. Learning and Instruction, 39, 55-71.
35. Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning & Instruction, 21, 687-704.
36. Meyerhoff, H. S., Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Schwan, S. (2011). Continuous visual cues trigger automatic spatial target updating in dynamic scenes. Cognition, 121, 73-82.
37. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Papenmeier, F., & Schwan, S. (2016). If you watch it move, you'll recognize it in 3D: Transfer of depth cues between encoding and retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 164, 90-95.
39. Peirce, C. S. (1940). The philosophy or Peirce: Selected writings. New York: Harcourt.
40. Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7, 216-237.
41. Salomon, G., & Cohen, A. A. (1977). Television formats, mastery of mental skills, and the acquisition of knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 612-619.
42. Sareen, P., Ehinger, K. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2015). Through the looking-glass: Objects in the mirror are less real. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 980-986.
43. Scheiter, K. (2014). The learner control principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 487-512). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
44. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., Imhof, B., & Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19, 481-494.
45. Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Eitel, A. (this volume). Learning from Multimedia: Cognitive Processes and Instructional Support.
46. Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary: Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101-120.
47. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
48. Schwan, S., Bauer, D., Kampschulte, J., & Hampp, C. (in press). Presentation equals representation? Photographs of objects received less attention and are less well remembered than real objects. Journal of Media Psychology.
49. Schwan, S., & Garsoffky, B. (2004). The cognitive representation of filmic event summaries. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 37-55.
50. Schwan, S., Garsoffky, B., & Hesse, F. W. (1998). The relationship between formal filmic means and the segmentation behavior of film viewers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 237-249.
51. Schwan, S., Garsoffky, B., & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences? Memory & Cognition, 28, 214-223.
52. Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49, 70-85.
53. Schwan, S., & Ildirar, S. (2010). Watching film for the first time: How adult viewers interpret perceptual discontinuities in film. Psychological Science, 21, 970-976.
54. Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (in press). Learning from animations: From 2D to 3D? In R. Plötzner & R. Lowe (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualizations: Innovations in research and application. New York: Springer.
55. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning & Instruction, 14, 293-305.
56. Smith, T. J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6, 1-27.
57. Soemer, A., & Schwan, S. (2016). Task-appropriate visualizations: Can the very same visualization format either promote or hinder learning depending on the task requirements? Journal of Educational Psychology.
58. Stafford, B. M. (1994). Artful science. Enlightment entertainment and the eclipse of visual education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Tibus, M., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2013). Do films make you learn? Inference processes in expository film comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 329-340.
60. Töpper, J., Glaser, M., & Schwan, S. (2014). Extending social cue based principles of multimedia learning beyond their immediate effects. Learning and Instruction, 29, 10-20.
61. Tversky, B., Bauer Morrison, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
62. van Gogh, T. (2014). The signaling (or cueing) principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 263-278). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
64. Yasar, O., & Seremet, M. (2007). A comparative analysis regarding pictures included in secondary school geography textbooks taught in Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16, 157-187.
65. Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1-14.
66. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.
67. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: S mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273-293.