If you watch it move, you'll recognize it in 3D: Transfer of depth cues between encoding and retrieval

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 164, Issue , 2016, Pages 90-95

  Papenmeier, Frank ^a   Schwan, Stephan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Depth from motion; Depth perception; Memory; Object recognition; Stereoscopic displays

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84953249931     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bennett D.J., Vuong Q.C. A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:1082-1093.
2. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94:115-147.
3. Biederman I., Bar M. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research 1999, 39:2885-2899.
4. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:1162-1182.
5. Bradshaw M.F., Rogers B.J. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Research 1996, 36:3457-3468. 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00072-7.
6. Braunstein M.L. The perception of depth through motion. Psychological Bulletin 1962, 59:422-433.
7. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1992, 89(1):60-64.
8. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S.Y., Tarr M.J. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5:247-260. 10.1093/cercor/5.3.247.
9. Burke D. Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:705-719. 10.1080/13506280444000463.
10. Burke D., Taubert J., Higman T. Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalising across different views of faces. Vision Research 2007, 47:2164-2169. 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018.
11. Dick M., Ullman S., Sagi D. Short- and long-range processes in structure-from-motion. Vision Research 1991, 31:2025-2028. 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90197-D.
12. Dövencioğlu D., Ban H., Schofield A.J., Welchman A.E. Perceptual integration for qualitatively different 3-D cues in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25:1527-1541. 10.1162/jocn_a_00417.
13. Edelman S., Bülthoff H.H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research 1992, 32:2385-2400.
14. Farah M.J., Rochlin R., Klein K.L. Orientation invariance and geometric primitives in shape recognition. Cognitive Science 1994, 18:325-344. 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90004-3.
15. Hart S.G., Staveland L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload 1988, 139-183. North-Holland, Amsterdam. P.A. Hancock, N. Meshkati (Eds.).
16. Hayward W.G., Tarr M.J. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1511-1521.
17. Hummel J.E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review 1992, 99:480-517. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480.
18. Humphrey G.K., Khan S.C. Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1992, 46:170-190.
19. Ichikawa M., Saida S. How is motion disparity integrated with binocular disparity in depth perception?. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:271-282.
20. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 1995, 35:389-412. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00176-M.
21. Lee Y.L., Saunders J.A. Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(9):1-12. 10.1167/11.9.6.
22. Liu C.H., Ward J. The use of 3D information in face recognition. Vision Research 2006, 46:768-773. 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.008.
23. Lobmaier J.S., Mast F.W., Hecht H. For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:36-40. 10.3758/PBR.17.1.36.
24. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1978, 200:269-294. 10.1098/rspb.1978.0020.
25. Marr D., Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1979, 204:301-328.
26. Nawrot M., Blake R. Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. Science 1989, 244:716-718. 10.1126/science.2717948.
27. Nawrot M., Blake R. The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 49:230-244. 10.3758/BF03214308.
28. Nawrot M., Blake R. On the perceptual identity of dynamic stereopsis and kinetic depth. Vision Research 1993, 33:1561-1571. 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90149-Q.
29. Perotti V.J., Todd J.T., Lappin J.S., Phillips F. The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:377-388.
30. Poom L., Börjesson E. Perceptual depth synthesis in the visual system as revealed by selective adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:504-517. 10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.504.
31. Rock I., DiVita J. A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:280-293. 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90013-2.
32. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:1494-1505.
33. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1989, 21:233-282. 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90009-1.
34. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame?. Psychological Science 1990, 1:253-256. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00209.x.
35. Tarr M.J., Williams P., Hayward W.G., Gauthier I. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:275-277. 10.1038/1089.
36. Tittle J.S., Perotti V.J. The perception of shape and curvedness from binocular stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1997, 59:1167-1179. 10.3758/BF03214205.
37. Todd J.T., Perotti V.J. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:1577-1589.
38. Todd J.T., Akerstrom R.A., Reichel F.D., Hayes W. Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors. Perception & Psychophysics 1988, 43:179-188. 10.3758/BF03214196.
39. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion 1979, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Ullman S., Basri R. Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1991, 13:992-1006.
41. Vandenberg S.G., Kuse A.R. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1978, 47:599-604. 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.
42. Wallach H., O'Connell D.N. The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1953, 45:205-217. 10.1037/h0056880.
43. Wallis G., Bülthoff H.H. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001, 98(8):4800-4804. 10.1073/pnas.071028598.
44. Wheeler M.E., Treisman A.M. Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:48-64. 10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.48.