Viewpoint Dependency in the Recognition of Dynamic Scenes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1035-1050

  Garsoffky, Bärbel ^a   Schwan, Stephan ^a,b   Hesse, Friedrich W ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECALL; SPORT; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SOCCER; SPACE PERCEPTION; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 85047672015     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1035     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Allen, G. C., Siegel, A. W., & Rosinski, R. R. (1978). The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 617-630.
2. Amorim, M., Trumbore, B., & Choygen, P. (2000). Cognitive repositioning inside a "desktop" VE: The constraints introduced by first-vs. third-person imagery and mental representation richness. Presence, 9, 165-186.
3. Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. London: Routledge.
4. Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (1986). Film art: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf.
5. Buhl, H. M. (1996). Erwerbssituation, mentale Repräsentation und sprachliche Lokalisationen - Blickpunktinformation als Bestandteil der Raumrepräsentation [Situation of acquisition, mental representation, and localization by language - Viewpoint information as part of space representation]. Sprache & Kognition, 15, 203-216.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60-64.
7. Cameron, G. T., & Frieske, D. A. (1994). The time needed to answer: Measurement of memory response latency. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 149-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Carroll, J. M., & Bever, T. G. (1976, March 12). Segmentation in cinema perception. Science, 19, 1053-1055.
9. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
10. Christou, C. G., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996-1007.
11. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 251-211.
12. de Vega, M. (1994). Characters and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments. Psychological Research, 56, 116-126.
13. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
14. Eley, M. G. (1982). Identifying rotated letter-like symbols. Memory & Cognition, 10, 25-32.
15. Franklin, N., Tversky, B., & Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models. Memory & Cognition, 20, 507-518.
16. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
17. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 324-363.
18. Haberlandt, K., Berian, C., & Sandson, J. (1980). The episode schema in story processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 635-650.
19. Hamm, J. P., & McMullen, P. A. (1998). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 413-426.
20. Hobbs, R., Frost, R., Davis, A., & Stauffer, J. (1988). How first-time viewers comprehend editing conventions. Journal of Communication, 38, 50-60.
21. Hock, H. S., & Schmelzkopf, K. F. (1980). The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 8, 543-554.
22. Jäger, A. O., & Althoff, K. (1983). Der WILDE-Intelligenz-Test (WIT). Ein Strukturdiagnostikum [The Wilde Intelligence Test. A diagnostic of structure]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe Verlag.
23. Jenkins, J. J., Wald, J., & Pittenger, J. B. (1986). Apprehending pictorial events. In V. McCabe & B. Balzano (Eds.), Event cognition: An ecological perspective (pp. 117-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Johnston, M. B., & Hayes, A. (2000). An experimental comparison of viewpoint-specific and viewpoint-independent models of object representation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53(A), 792-824.
25. Kipper, P. (1986). Television camera movement as a source of perceptual information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 295-307.
26. Kraft, R. N. (1987). Rules and strategies of visual narratives. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 3-14.
27. Kraft, R. N., Cantor, P., & Gottdiener, C. (1991). The coherence of visual narratives. Communication Research, 18, 601-616.
28. Kraft, R. N., & Jenkins, J. J. (1977). Memory for lateral orientation of slides in picture stories. Memory & Cognition, 5, 397-403.
29. Lasher, M. D. (1981). The cognitive representation of an event involving human motion. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 391-406.
30. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 395-416.
31. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533-545.
32. Messaris, P. (1994). Visual literacy. Image, mind, & reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436-450.
34. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
35. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
36. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304-308.
37. Rowland, G. L, Franken, R. E., Bouchard, L. M., & Sookochoff, M. B. (1978). Recognition of familiar scenes from new perspectives. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 1287-1292.
38. Salzman, M. C., Dede, C., & Loftin, R. B. (1999). VR's frames of reference: A visualization technique for mastering abstract information spaces. In Proceedings of CHI '99 (pp. 489-495). Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press.
39. Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.
40. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
41. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971, February 19). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
42. Shepard, S., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 3-11.
43. Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494-1507.
44. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
45. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
46. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
47. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinski, M., & Blanz, V. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in view-point? Psychological Science, 8, 282-289.
48. Ullman, S., & Basri, R. (1991). Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13, 992-1005.
49. Zettl, H. (1990). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.