Drivers' comfort boundaries in pedestrian crossings: A study in driver braking characteristics as a function of pedestrian walking speed

Safety Science

Volumn 75, Issue , 2015, Pages 100-106

  Lubbe, Nils ^a,b   Davidsson, Johan ^b  

^a Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA   (Belgium)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Brake reaction; Driver behavior; False positive; Forward collision warning; Pedestrian

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; CROSSWALKS; FOOTBRIDGES; PEDESTRIAN SAFETY; SPEED;

BRAKE DECELERATIONS; BRAKING CHARACTERISTICS; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; FALSE POSITIVE; FORWARD COLLISION WARNINGS; PEDESTRIAN; TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATIONS; URBAN ENVIRONMENTS;

BRAKES;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECELERATION; DRIVER LICENCE; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PEDESTRIAN; REACTION TIME; SIMULATOR; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; URBAN AREA; WALKING SPEED;

EID: 84923017871     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abe G., Richardson J. Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Appl. Ergon. 2006, 37(5):577-586.
2. Adachi, T., Yonekawa, T., Fuwamoto, Y., Ito, S., Iwazaki, K., 2014. Motion cueing for prevention of simulator sickness caused by unnecessary vestibulo-ocular reflex. In: FISITA World Automotive Congress, Maastricht, The Netherlands, paper number F2014-AHF-003.
3. AEB Group. 2011. AEB Test Procedures (Accessed 12.11.14). http://www.trafikverket.se.
4. Bliss J.P., Acton S.A. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Appl. Ergon. 2003, 34(6):499-509.
5. Bromberg S., Oron-Gilad T., Ronen A., Borowsky A., Parmet Y. The perception of pedestrians from the perspective of elderly experienced and experienced drivers. Accident Anal. Prevention 2012, 44:48-55.
6. Iwaki, R., Wakasugi, T., Teraoka Morales, Y.E., Tanaka, S., Uchida, N., 2013. Analysis of driver response to road crossing pedestrian (Japanese with English abstract). In: JSAE Annual Congress, Paper Number 20135756.
7. Lindman, M., Ödblom, A., Bergvall, E., Eidehall, A., Svanberg, B., Lukaszewicz, T., 2010. Benefit estimation model for pedestrian auto brake functionality. In: 4th International Conference on Expert Symposium on Accident Research (ESAR), Hannover, Germany, Paper Number 11.
8. Ljung Aust, M., Dombrovskis, S., 2013. Understanding and improving driver compliance with safety system feedback. In: Proceedings of The 23rd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Paper Number 13-0455.
9. Lubbe N., Rosén E. Pedestrian crossing situations: quantification of comfort boundaries to guide intervention timing. Accident Anal. Prevention 2014, 71:261-266.
10. Montgomery J., Kusano K.D., Gabler H.C. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-car naturalistic driving study. Traffic Injury Prevention 2014, 15(Suppl. 1):15-20.
11. Pace, J.F. et al., 2012. Basic fact sheet "Pedestrians", Deliverable D3.9 of the EC FP7 project DaCoTA.
12. Pla, M., Schaller, T., de Hair, S., Lemmen, P., Lubbe, N., 2014. Assessment methodologies for forward looking integrated pedestrian safety systems - the AsPeCSS project. In: FISITA World Automotive Congress, Maastricht, The Netherlands, paper number F2014-AST-071.
13. Niewöhner, W., Roth, F., Gwehenberger, J., Gruber, C., Kuehn, M., Sferco, R., Pastor, C.H., Nagel, U., Stanzel, M., 2011. Proposal for a test procedure of assistance systems regarding preventive pedestrian protection. In: Proceedings of 22nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference, Washington DC, USA, Paper Number 11-0393.
14. Raudszus, D., Ranovona, M., Geronimi, S., Kunert., Schubert, E., Schaller, T., 2013. Report on Driver and Pedestrian Reaction Model. AsPeCSS project deliverable D2.4. (Accessed 12.11.14). http://www.aspecss-project.eu/userdata/file/Public%20deliveables/ASPECSS-D2.4-FINAL-Driver%20Model-2013-06-27.pdf.
15. Robinson, B., Hulshof, W., Cookson, R., Cuerden, R., Hutchins, R., Delmonte, E., 2011. Cost benefit evaluation of advanced primary safety systems - final report. TRL Published Project Report 586.
16. Rosén E., Källhammer J.E., Eriksson D., Nentwich M., Fredriksson R., Smith K. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. Accident Anal. Prevention 2010, 42:1949-1957.
17. Rosén, E., 2013. Autonomous emergency braking for vulnerable road users. In: Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Paper Number 13-71.
18. Seininger, P., Bartels, O., Kunert, M., Schaller, T., 2014. Test procedure including test target and misuse tests, based on test results. AsPeCSS project deliverable D2.5. (Accessed 04.07.14). http://www.aspecss-project.eu.
19. Wege C., Will S., Victor T. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings - a naturalistic driving study. Accident Anal. Prevention 2013, 58:259-270.
20. Wisch, M., Seininger, P., Pastor, C., Edwards, M., Visvikis, C., Reeves, C., 2013. Scenarios and weighting factors for pre-crash assessment of integrated pedestrian safety systems. AsPeCSS project deliverable D1.1 (Accessed 12.11.14). http://www.aspecss-project.eu.