Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): Driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 679-697

  Liu, Yung Ching ^a   Wen, Ming Hui ^a  

^a NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; NAVIGATION; TRANSPORTATION; VEHICLES;

COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATION SYSTEMS (CVOS); HEAD-DOWN DISPLAYS (HDD); HEAD-UP DISPLAY (HUD); INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ITS); TRANSPORT SYSTEM LOGISTICS (TSL);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 4544332283     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen, R.W., Jeffrey, R.H., 1995. Low cost driving simulation for research training and screening application. Paper 950171, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendales, pp. 43-52.
2. Briziarelli G., Allan R.W. The effect of a head-up speedometer on speeding behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 69:1989;1171-1176.
3. Collins, D.J., Biever, J.W., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., 1999. Development of human factors guidelines for advanced traveler information systems (atis) and commercial vehicle operations (cvo): an examination of driver performance under reduced visibility conditions when using an in-vehicle signing and information system(isis). Publication No. FHWA-RD- 99-130, US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
4. Dingus T.A., Antin J.F., Hulse M.C., Wierwille W.W. Attention demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transportation Research. 23A(4):1989;301-315.
5. Enderby, C.M., Wood, S.T., 1992. Head-up display in automobile/aircraft applications. SAE Technical Paper Series No. 920740, Society of Automobile, New York.
6. Fischer, E., Haines, R.F., Price, T.A., 1980. Cognitive issues in head-up displays. NASA Technical Paper 1711, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
7. French, R.L., 1990. In-vehicle navigation - status and safety impacts. Technical Papers from ITE's 1990, 1989, and 1988 Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, pp. 226-235.
8. Gawron V.J. Human Performance Measures Handbook. 2000;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Green, P., 1999. The 15-second rule for driver information systems. Proceedings of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America Conference (CD-ROM), Intelligent Transportation Society of America, Washington, DC.
10. Green, P., 2001. Variations in task performance between younger and older drivers: UMTRI research on Telematics. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Conference on Aging and Driving, February 19-20, 2001, Southfield, MI.
11. Green, P., Levison, W., Paelke, G., Serafin, C., 1995. Preliminary human factors design guidelines for driver information systems. FHWA-RD-94-087, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
12. Haines, R.F., Fischer, E., Price, T.A., 1980. Head-up transition behavior of pilots with and without head-up displays in simulated low-visibility approaches. NASA-Ames Research Center, NASA TP-1720, Moffet Field, CA.
13. Hooey, B.L., Gore, B.F., 1998. Advanced traveler information systems and commercial vehicle operations components of the intelligent transportation systems: head-up displays and driver attention for navigation information. FHWA-RD-96-153, US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
14. Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D., 2002. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Technical Report AHFD-02-13/GM-02-2, Aviation Human Factors Division, Institute of Aviation.
15. Iarish, I., Wickens, C.D., 1991. Attention and HUDs: flying in the dark? Society for Information Display international Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XXII, pp. 461-464.
16. Iino, T., Otsuka, T., Suzuki, Y., 1988. Development of heads-up display for motor vehicle. Paper 880217, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, pp. 15-23.
17. Kaptein, N.A., 1994. Benefits of in-car head-up displays. TNO Report TNO-TM 1994 B-20, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, The Netherlands.
18. Kato, H., Ito, H., Shima, J., Imaizumi, M., Shibata, H., 1992. Development of hologram head-up display. SAE Technical Report Paper No. 920600. Society of Automobile Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
19. Kiefer, R.J., 1991. Effect of a head-up versus head-down digital speedometer on visual sampling behavior and speed control performance during daytime automobile driving. Paper 910111, Society of Automotive Engineers, New York.
20. K., Wierwille, W.W., 1991. Effects of instrument panel clutter and control on visual demand and task performance. Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XXII, pp. 99-102.
21. Larry, C., Elworth, C.L., 1972. The effects of pilot age, lighting, and head-down time on visual accommodation. Report Number D162-10378-1 TN (REV LTR), The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA.
22. Liu Y.-C. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveler information systems. Ergonomics. 44(4):2001;425-442.
23. Liu Y.-C., Wen M.-H. Visual display designs of the logistics delivery lorry in-vehicle information system in Taiwan. Journal of Ergonomics Study 6:2004;11-20. (in Chinese).
24. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. Nielsen J., Mack R.L. Usability Inspection Methods. 1994;Wiley, New York.
25. Okabayashi, S., Sakata, M., Fukano, J., Daidoji, S., Hashimoto, C., Ishikawa, T., 1989. Development of practical heads-up display for production vehicle application. Paper 890559, Society of Automotive Engineers, New York, pp. 69-78.
26. Rutley K.S. Control of drivers' speed by means other than enforcement. Ergonomics. 18:1975;89-100.
27. Sojourner R.J., Antin J.F. The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance. Human Factors. 32(3):1990;329-339.
28. Stein, A.C., 1990. The use of low-cost interactive driving simulation to detect impaired drivers. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Proceedings of the AAAM, AAAM, Scottsdale, pp. 523-536.
29. Tinker, P., Azuma, R., Hein, C., Daily, M., 1996. Driving simulation for crash avoidance warning evaluation. Proceedings of the 29th ISATA Dedicated Conference on Simulation, Diagnosis and Virtual Reality in the Automotive Industry, June 3-6, 1996, Florence, Italy, pp. 367-374.
30. Ward N., Parkes A. Head-up displays and their automotive application. an overview of human factors issues affecting safety Accident Analysis and Prevention. 6:1994;703-717.
31. Weihrauch, M., Melocny, G., Goesch, T., 1989. The first head-up display introduced by General Motors. SAE Technical Paper No. 890228, Society of Automobile, New York.
32. Weintraub, D.J., Ensing, M., 1992. Human factors issues in head-up display design: the book of HUD. State-of the-art Report, Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center (CSERIAC), Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH.
33. Wickens C.D., Martin-Emerson R., Larish I. Attentional tunneling and the head-up display. Jensen R.S. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. 1993;865-870 Ohio State University, Columbus.
34. Wierwille W.W. An initial model of visual sampling of in-car displays and controls. Gale A.G., Freeman M.H., Halsegrave C.M., Smith P., Taylor S.P. Vision in Vehicle IV. 1993;271-280 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
35. Wierwille, W.W., 1995. Development of an initial model relating driver in-vehicle visual demands to accident rate. Proceedings of the Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, pp. 1-7.
36. Zwhalen H.T., Adams C.C. Jr., DeBald D.P. Safety aspects of CRT panel controls in automobiles. Gale A.G., Freeman M.H., Haslegrave C.M., Smith P., Taylor S.P. Vision in Vehicles II. 1988;335-344 Elsevier, Amsterdam.