The effects of interface design for Head-up display on driver behavior

Life Science Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 2058-2065

  Huang, Cheng Hung ^a   Chao, Chun Wen ^a   Tsai, Tienwei ^b   Hung, Ming Hui ^a  

^a TATUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHIHLEE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Driver behavior; Head up Display (HUD); In Vehicle Information System (IVIS); Interface design; Speed control

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880790880     PISSN: 10978135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blanco, M., Biever, W. J., Gallagher, J. P., & Dingus, T. A. (2006). The impact of secondarytask cognitive processing demand on driving performance. Accident Analysis &Prevention, 38(5), 895-906.
2. Caird, J.K., Chisholm, S.L., & Lockhart, J. (2008). Do in-vehicle advanced signs enhance older and younger drivers' intersection performance? Driving simulation and eye movement results. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 132-144.
3. Chao, C.-W., Huang, C. H., Tsai, T. (2013). The Age Effects of Traffic Signs on Visual Performance. Life Science Journal, 10(1):297-302.
4. Hibberd, D. L., Jamson, S. L. and Carsten, O. M. J.(2010). "Managing in-vehicle distractions: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm" Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 4-11.
5. Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M. A., Triggs, T. J., & Brown, J. (2006). Driver distraction:The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age ondriving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(1), 185-191
6. Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., &Alexander, A. L.(2003). The effects of head-up display clutter and in-vehicle display separation on concurrent driving performance. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 47th annual meeting. Surface Transportation, pp. 1880-1884.
7. Infiniti Research.(2013). Global Nondestructive Testing Equipment Market 2012-2016.
8. Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driverbehaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving.
9. Konrad, B., & Bruce, T. (2001). User Interface Design for Electronic Appliances. London, New York: Taylor & Francis.
10. Flynn, D., Schaik, P. V., Wersch, A. V., (2004). "A comparison of multi-item Likert and visual analogue scales for the assessment of transactionally defined coping function". European Journal of Psychological Assessment 20(1): 49-58.
11. Liu, Y.C., & Wen, M. H, (2004). Comparison of Head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 679-691.
12. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010). Statistics and Facts About Distracted Driving.
13. Weinberg, G., Harsham, B., and Medenica, Z. InvestigatingHUDs for the Presentation of Choice Lists in Car NavigationSystems. In Proc. of Driving Assessment. (2011).195-202.
14. Wittmann, M., Miklos K., Peter G., Alexander, S., Martina, F., Ernst, P., &Hiroyuki, K. (2005). Effects of display position of avisual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 187-199.
15. Yau, Y. J., Chao, C.J., & Hwang, S. L.(2008). Optimization of Chinese interface design in motion environment. Science Direct, 29, 308-315.