Food and beverage product reformulation as a corporate political strategy

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 172, Issue , 2017, Pages 37-45

  Scott, C ^a   Hawkins, B ^a   Knai, C ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Food industry; Framing; Narratives; Nutrition policy; Obesity; Political strategy; Product reformulation

Indexed keywords

BEVERAGE; CORPORATE STRATEGY; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD QUALITY; NUTRITION; OBESITY;

ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PROCESSING; GOVERNMENT; POLICY; POLITICS; PRODUCT REFORMULATION; TAXONOMY; UNITED STATES; CLASSIFICATION; ETHICS; FOOD; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NUTRITION POLICY; ORGANIZATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

UNITED STATES;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

BEVERAGES; CLASSIFICATION; FOOD; FOOD INDUSTRY; HUMANS; NUTRITION POLICY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; POLITICS; PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS;

EID: 85032088038     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, Appendix E-7: public comments. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee – Advisory Report to the Secretary of Human Health and Services and the Secretary of Agriculture, 2015.
2. 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, Part D. Chapter 6: cross-cutting topics of public health importance. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee – Advisory Report to the Secretary of Human Health and Services and the Secretary of Agriculture, 2015.
3. Alliance for a Healthier Generation, n.d. Take Action: Industry. [WWW Document]. URL https://www.healthiergeneration.org/take_action/industry/ (accessed 02.03.16.).
4. Atkinson, R., Narratives of policy: the construction of urban problems and urban policy in the official discourse of British government 1968–1998. Crit. Soc. Policy 20 (2000), 211–232, 10.1177/026101830002000202.
5. Bailin, D., Goldman, G., Phartiyal, P., Sugar-coating Science. 2014, 20.
6. Bes-Rastrollo, M., Schulze, M.B., Ruiz-Canela, M., Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A., Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med., 10, 2013, e1001578, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578.
7. Bødker, M., Pisinger, C., Toft, U., Jørgensen, T., The rise and fall of the world's first fat tax. Health Policy (New. York) 119 (2015), 737–742, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.003.
8. Brownell, K.D., Warner, K.E., The perils of ignoring history: big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?. Milbank Q 87 (2009), 259–294, 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x.
9. Cannon, G., Why the Bush administration and the global sugar industry are determined to demolish the 2004 WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Public Heal. Nutr. 7 (2004), 369–380.
10. Center for Science in the Public Interest, Big Soda vs. Public Health – How the Industry Opens its Checkbook to Defeat Health Measures. 2015.
11. Combris, P., Goglia, R., Henini, M., Soler, L.G., Spiteri, M., Improvement of the nutritional quality of foods as a public health tool. Public Health 125 (2011), 717–724, 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.07.004.
12. Dietz, W.H., New strategies to improve food marketing to children. Health Aff. (Millwood) 32 (2013), 1652–1658, 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1294.
13. Dorfman, L., Wallack, L., Moving nutrition upstream: the case for reframing obesity. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 39 (2007), S45–S50 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.018.
14. Dorfman, L., Wallack, L., Woodruff, K., More than a message: framing public health advocacy to change corporate practices. Heal. Educ. Behav. 32 (2005), 320–336.
15. Dorfman, L., Cheyne, A., Friedman, L.C., Wadud, A., Gottlieb, M., Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: how do they compare?. PLoS Med., 9, 2012, e1001241, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001241.
16. Elliott, C., Marketing foods to children: are we asking the right questions?. Child. Obes. 8 (2012), 191–194.
17. Entman, R.M., Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43 (1993), 51–58, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
18. Fleischhacker, S., Food fight: the battle over redefining competitive foods. J. Sch. Health 77 (2007), 147–152, 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00184.x.
19. Freedhoff, Y., The food industry is neither friend, nor foe, nor partner. Obes. Rev. 15 (2014), 6–8, 10.1111/obr.12128.
20. Freedhoff, Y., Hébert, P.C., Partnerships between health organizations and the food industry risk derailing public health nutrition. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 183 (2011), 291–292, 10.1503/cmaj.110085.
21. Freudenberg, N., The manufacture of lifestyle: the role of corporations in unhealthy living. J. Public Heal. Policy 33 (2012), 244–256, 10.1057/jphp.2011.60.
22. Freudenberg, N., Lethal but Legal: Corporations, Consumption, and Protecting Public Health. 2014.
23. Goldman, G., Carlson, C., Bailin, D., Fong, L., Phartiyal, P., Added Sugar, Subtracted Science: How Industry Obscures Science and Undermines Public Health Policy on Sugar. 2014.
24. Gomez, L., Jacoby, E., Ibarra, L., Lucumi, D., Hernandez, A., Parra, D., Florindo, A., Hallal, P., Sponsorship of physical activity programs by the sweetened beverages industry: public health or public relations?. Rev. Saude Publica 45 (2011), 423–427.
25. Haufler, V., A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-regulation in a Global Economy. 2001, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington D.C.
26. Hawkes, C., Buse, K., Public health sector and food industry interaction: it's time to clarify the term “partnership” and be honest about underlying interests. Eur. J. Public Health 21 (2011), 400–401, 10.1093/eurpub/ckr077.
27. Hawkins, B., Holden, C., Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Crit. Policy Stud. 7 (2013), 53–71, 10.1080/19460171.2013.766023.
28. health.gov, 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Request for Public Comment. 2014 [WWW Document]. URL http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015DGACRequestForPublicComments.asp (accessed 29.02.16.).
29. health.gov, Read Archived Comments. 2015 [WWW Document]. URL http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2015/comments/readArchivedComments.aspx (accessed 29.02.16.).
30. Hillman, A.J., Hitt, M.A., Corporate political strategy formulation: a model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24 (1999), 825–842.
31. Hobbs, S.H., Ricketts, T.C., Dodds, J.M., Milio, N., Analysis of interest group influence on federal school meals regulations 1992 to 1996. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 36 (2004), 90–98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60139-5.
32. Jou, J., Niederdeppe, J., Barry, C.L., Gollust, S.E., Strategic messaging to promote taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: lessons from recent political campaigns. Am. J. Public Health 104 (2014), 847–853, 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301679.
33. Kearns, C.E., Glantz, S.A., Schmidt, L.A., Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research's 1971 National caries program: a Historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med., 12, 2015, e1001798.
34. Ken, I., A Healthy bottom line: obese children, a pacified public, and corporate legitimacy. Soc. Curr. 1:2 (2014), 130–148, 10.1177/2329496514524927.
35. Kersh, R., The politics of obesity: a current assessment and look ahead. Milbank Q 87 (2009), 295–316, 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00556.x.
36. Kmietowicz, Z., Coca-Cola funded group set up to promote “energy balance” is disbanded. BMJ, 351, 2015.
37. Knai, C., Gilmore, A., Lock, K., McKee, M., Public health research funding: independence is important. Lancet 376 (2010), 75–77, 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62063-8.
38. Koplan, J.P., Brownell, K.D., Response of the food and beverage industry to the obesity threat. JAMA 304 (2010), 1487–1488, 10.1001/jama.2010.1436.
39. Kraak, V.I., Harrigan, P.B., Lawrence, M., Harrison, P.J., Jackson, M.A., Swinburn, B., Balancing the benefits and risks of public-private partnerships to address the global double burden of malnutrition. Public Heal. Nutr. 15 (2012), 503–517, 10.1017/s1368980011002060.
40. Kurzer, P., Cooper, A., Biased or not? Organized interests and the case of EU food information labeling. J. Eur. Public Policy 20 (2013), 722–740, 10.1080/13501763.2012.751703.
41. Kwan, S., Individual versus corporate responsibility. Food, Cult. Soc. 12 (2009), 477–495, 10.2752/175174409X456755.
42. Lesser, L.I., Ebbeling, C.B., Goozner, M., Wypij, D., Ludwig, D.S., Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med., 4, 2007, e5, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040005.
43. Let's Move, n.d. Let's Move. [WWW Document]. URL ww.letsmove.gov (accessed 02.03.16.).
44. Lewin, A., Lindstrom, L., Nestle, M., Food industry promises to address childhood obesity: preliminary evaluation. J. Public Health Policy 27 (2006), 327–348, 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200098.
45. Ludwig, D.S., Nestle, M., Can the food industry play a constructive role in the obesity epidemic?. JAMA 300 (2008), 1808–1811, 10.1001/jama.300.15.1808.
46. Mah, C.L., Hamill, C., Rondeau, K., McIntyre, L., A frame-critical policy analysis of Canada's response to the World Food Summit 1998–2008. Arch. Public Heal 72 (2014), 1–7, 10.1186/2049-3258-72-41.
47. Mars Inc, n.d. Improving Our Products. [WWW Document]. URL http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/health-and-nutrition/improving-our-products.aspx (accessed 02.03.16.).
48. McBeth, M.K., Shanahan, E.A., Arnell, R.J., Hathaway, P.L., The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. Policy Stud. J. 35 (2007), 87–108, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00208.x.
49. McCambridge, J., Hawkins, B., Holden, C., Industry use of evidence to influence alcohol policy: a case study of submissions to the 2008 Scottish government consultation. PLoS Med., 10, 2013, e1001431, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001431.
50. McDonald's, n.d. Good Food. [WWW Document]. URL http://www.aboutmcdonalds.com/mcd/sustainability/food.html (accessed 02.03.16.).
51. Mialon, M., Swinburn, B., Sacks, G., A proposed approach to systematically identify and monitor the corporate political activity of the food industry with respect to public health using publicly available information. Obes. Rev. 16 (2015), 519–530, 10.1111/obr.12289.
52. Miller, D., Harkins, C., Corporate strategy, corporate capture: food and alcohol industry lobbying and public health. Crit. Soc. Policy 30 (2010), 564–589, 10.1177/0261018310376805.
53. Monteiro, C.A., Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing. Public Heal. Nutr. 12 (2009), 729–731, 10.1017/s1368980009005291.
54. Monteiro, C.A., Levy, R.B., Claro, R.M., de Castro, I.R., Cannon, G., Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Heal. Nutr. 14 (2011), 5–13, 10.1017/s1368980010003241.
55. Moodie, R., Stuckler, D., Monteiro, C., Sheron, N., Neal, B., Thamarangsi, T., Lincoln, P., Casswell, S., Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet 381 (2013), 670–679.
56. Myers, D.J., The food industry's solution to the obesity epidemic: take a walk. New Solut. 16 (2006), 13–16, 10.2190/7054-AFFJ-4WU3-3KFY.
57. Nelson, R., “Cheeseburger Bill” protects food industry. Lancet, 363, 2004, 954, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15826-1.
58. Nestle, M., Food lobbies, the food pyramid, and U.S. nutrition policy. Int. J. Heal. Serv. 23 (1993), 483–496.
59. Nestle, M., Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. 2002, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
60. Nestle, M., Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: science or marketing?. JAMA Intern. Med., 2015, 1–2.
61. Nestle, M., Wilson, T., Food industry and political influences on American nutrition. Temple, N.J., Wilson, T., Jacobs, D.R.J., (eds.) Nutritional Health: Strategies for Disease Prevention, 2012, Springer Scients & Business Media.
62. Ng, S.W., Dunford, E., Complexities and opportunities in monitoring and evaluating US and global changes by the food industry. Obes. Rev. 14:Suppl. 2 (2013), 29–41, 10.1111/obr.12095.
63. Nixon, L., Mejia, P., Cheyne, A., Wilking, C., Dorfman, L., Daynard, R., “We're part of the solution”: evolution of the food and beverage Industry's framing of obesity concerns between 2000 and 2012. Am. J. Public Health 105 (2015), 2228–2236, 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302819.
64. Oppenheimer, G.M., Benrubi, I.D., McGovern's senate select committee on nutrition and human needs versus the meat industry on the diet-heart question (1976-1977). Am. J. Public Heal 104 (2014), 59–69, 10.2105/ajph.2013.301464.
65. Oreskes, N., Conway, E.M., Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. 2010, Bloomsbury Press, New York.
66. Otite, F.O., Jacobson, M.F., Dahmubed, A., Mozaffarian, D., Trends in trans fatty acids reformulations of US supermarket and brand-name foods from 2007 through 2011. Prev. Chronic Dis., 10, 2013.
67. Partnership for a Healthier America, n.d. About the Partnership. [WWW Document]. URL http://ahealthieramerica.org/about/about-the-partnership/ (accessed 02.03.16.).
68. QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software. 2012.
69. Sacks, G., Swinburn, B., Kraak, V., Downs, S., Walker, C., Barquera, S., Friel, S., Hawkes, C., Kelly, B., Kumanyika, S., L'Abbé, M., Lee, A., Lobstein, T., Ma, J., Macmullan, J., Mohan, S., Monteiro, C., Neal, B., Rayner, M., Sanders, D., Snowdon, W., Vandevijvere, S., INFORMAS. A proposed approach to monitor private-sector policies and practices related to food environments, obesity and non-communicable disease prevention. Obes. Rev. 14 (2013), 38–48, 10.1111/obr.12074.
70. Saloojee, Y., Dagli, E., Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bull. World Health Organ 78 (2000), 902–910.
71. Savell, E., Gilmore, A.B., Fooks, G., How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing Regulations? A systematic review. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e87389.
72. Savell, E., Fooks, G., Gilmore, A.B., How does the alcohol industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review. Addiction 111 (2016), 18–32, 10.1111/add.13048.
73. Sharma, L.L., Teret, S.P., Brownell, K.D., The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Am. J. Public Heal 100 (2010), 240–246, 10.2105/ajph.2009.160960.
74. Shelley, D., Ogedegbe, G., Elbel, B., Same strategy different industry: corporate influence on public policy. Am. J. Public Heal 104 (2014), e9–e11.
75. Siega-Riz, A.M., 2015. Subcommittee 2: Dietary Patterns Foods and Nutrients and Health Outcomes, 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Second Meeting Day 2, 3:30:36–3:31:29.
76. Simon, M., Bush supersizes effort to weaken the world health organization. Int. J. Health Serv. 35 (2005), 405–407.
77. Slining, M.M., Ng, S.W., Popkin, B.M., Food companies' calorie-reduction pledges to improve U.S. diet. Am. J. Prev. Med. 44 (2013), 174–184, 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.064.
78. Stone, D.A., Policy Paradox: the Art of Political Decision Making. 2012, W.W. Norton, New York, NY.
79. The Hershey Company, n.d. Our Simple Commitment to Goodness – Q&A. [WWW Document]. URL https://www.thehersheycompany.com/our-ingredients/q-and-a.aspx (accessed 02.03.16.).
80. The NYC Health Department, n.d. National Salt Reduction Initiative. [WWW Document]. URL http://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/health-topics/national-salt-reduction-initiative.page (accessed 02.03.16.).
81. The PLoS Medicine Editors, PLoS Medicine series on big food: the food industry is ripe for scrutiny. PLoS Med., 9, 2012, e1001246.
82. The Secretary of Health and Human Services, Charter 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2013.
83. The White House – Office of the First Lady, Remarks by the First Lady at a Grocery Manufacturers Association Conference. 2010.
84. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2005.
85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015. eighth ed., 2015.
86. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Opportunities to Align Food Products and Menus with the Dietary Guidelines, in: 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2015.
87. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Draft Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Sodium Reduction Goals: Target Mean and Upper Bound Concentrations for Sodium in Commercially Processed, Packaged, and Prepared Foods. 2016.
88. Vallgarda, S., Holm, L., Jensen, J.D., The Danish tax on saturated fat: why it did not survive. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 69 (2015), 223–226.
89. Weible, C., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., Sabatier, P., Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sci. 45 (2012), 1–21, 10.1007/s11077-011-9143-5.
90. Winkler, J.T., Brutal pragmatism on food. BMJ, 346, 2013, 10.1136/bmj.f3728.
91. Winkler, J.T., Nutritional reformulation: the unobtrusive strategy. Food Sci. Technol. 28 (2014), 37–40.
92. World Health Organization, Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. 2004.
93. World Health Organization, Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020., 2013 (Report).
94. Yanamadala, S., Bragg, M.A., Roberto, C.A., Brownell, K.D., Food industry front groups and conflicts of interest: the case of Americans against Food Taxes. Public Health Nutr. 15 (2012), 1331–1332, 10.1017/S1368980012003187.